JUDGMENT OF 12. 7. 1962 — CASE 18/60 WORMS v HIGH AUTHORITY

In Case 18/60

THE COURT composed of: A. M. Donner, President, O. Riese and R. Rossi (Presidents of Chambers), L. Delvaux (Rapporteur) and A. Trabucchi, Judges, Advocate-General: M. Lagrange Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Conclusions of the parties

II — Summary of the facts

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

A — Brief outline of the submissions

B — As to admissibility

1. On the admissibility of the first submission: the boycott of Worms by the OCCF.

(a) Liability of the High Authority arising from the fact that the OCCF is one of its organs

(b) Liability of the High Authority arising from its obligations as a public authority

2. On the admissibility of the second submission: the boycott of Worms by the Dutch scrap-dealers

3. On the admissibility of the third submission: the failure of the High Authority to act in the affair of the ferrous scrap frauds

C — On the substance of the case

1. Whether the first submission — the boycott of Worms by the OCCF — is well founded

2. Whether the second submission — the boycott of Worms by the Dutch scrap-dealers — is well founded

3. Whether the third submission — the failure of the High Authority to act in the affair of the ferrous scrap frauds — is well founded

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

A — As to admissibility

B — On the substance of the case

C — Costs