JUDGMENT OF 19.3.64 — CASE 67/63 SOREMA v HIGH AUTHORITY

In Case 67/63

THE COURT composed of: A. M. Donner, President, Ch. L. Hammes (Rapporteur) and A. Trabucchi, Presidents of Chambers, L. Delvaux, R. Rossi, R. Lecourt and W. Strauß, Judges. Advocate-General: K. Roemer Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

A — Admissibility

B — Substance

First ground of complaint: Infringement of Article 80

Second ground of complaint: Illegal revocation

Third complaint: Addition ex post facto of an additional condition for the validity of the authorization

Fourth complaint: Failure to state reasons establishing the existence of a restriction of competition

Fifth complaint: Mo restrictions on competition arise out of SOREMA's membership of the OKU

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

I — Admissibility

II — The substance

A — The first complaint

B — The second complaint

III — Costs