Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 24 September 1986

1 Translated fom the French.

2 Sec in particular the judgment of 29 November 1983, Case 181/82 Round Laboniloria v Netherlands [1983] ECR 3849.

3 See in particular the Court's judgment of 10 January 1985, Case 229/83 Association des Centres Distributeurs Edouard Ledere and Another v Au Blé Vert Sari and Others [1985] ECR 1, at paragraph 23 of the decision.

4 Judgment of 24 January 1978, Case 82/77 Openbaar Mintitene/Van Tigele[1978] ECR 25.

5 See the Opinion of Mr Advocate General Reischl in Case 75/81 Blesgen v Belgium [1982] ECR 1211, at p. 1238; see also G. Marenco, Pour une interprétation traditionnelle de la notion de mesure d'effet équivalent à une restriction quantitative, Cahiers de Droit Européen, 1984, pp. 291 et seq. and in particular p. 337.

6 Judgment of 3 July 1979, Joined Cases 185 lo 204/78 Van Dam and Others [1979] ECR 2345, at p. 2361.

7 Judgment of 25 January 1983, Case 126/82 Smit v Commissie Grensoverschrijdend Beroepsgocderenvervoer [1983] ECR 73, atp. 92.

8 Judgment of 7 February 1984, Case 237/82 Jongeneel Kaas and Others v Netherlands [1984] ECR 483, at p. 505.

9 Judgment of 13 March 1979, Case 86/78 Peureux v Services fiscaux de la Haute-Saône et du territoire de Belfort [1979] ECR 897, at paragraphs 32 and 33 and in the operative part.

10 See judgment of 27 October 1982, Joined Cases 35 and 36/82 Morion andfhanjanv State of the Netherlands [1982] ECR 3723 (paragraph 16 of the decision).

11 See also the Commission's answer to Written Question No 2338/82 by Mr Bonde, OJ 1983 C 177, pp. 13-14, which refers to the judgment of 29 October 1980, Case 22/80 Boussacv Gerstenmeier [1980] ECR 3427.