Report for the Hearing delivered in Joined Cases 193 and 194/87

I — Facts and procedure

II — Conclusions of the parties

1. Mr Maurissen and The European Public Service Union claim that the Coun should:

2. In his application Mr Maurissen also claimed that the Court should annul the decision of the President of the Court of Auditors of 2 June 1987. However, in his reply he stated that he was withdrawing his action in so far as it related to that decision and asked the Court to acknowledge the withdrawal.

3. The Court of Auditors contends that the Court should:

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties concerning the admissibility of the actions

1. The Court of Auditors submits that Mr Maurissen's conclusions are inadmissible since the decisions challenged are not capable of adversely affecting him.

2. Mr Maurissen claims that the Court should reject those pleas of inadmissibility.

3. The Court of Auditors also submits that the Union's application is inadmissible for a number of reasons:

4. In reply, the European Public Service Union puts forward a number of arguments:

IV — Replies to questions asked by the Court

1. The Court (Third Chamber) asked the European Public Service Union the following question:

2. The Court put the following question to the European Public Service Union:

3. The Court put the following question to the Court of Auditors:

1 Language of the Case. French