lagen.
EU-domstolen

Summary of the Advocate General's Opinion

CELEX
61988CC0111
Typ
EU-domstolen

Källa

1 Original language: Dutch

2 OJ 1988 L 218 p 19

3 OJ 1988 L 325 p 58

4 See the judgment of 1 July 1965 in Joined Cases 106 and 107/63 Töpfer v Commission [1965] ECR 405, and of 18 November 1975 in Case 100/74 CAM v Commission [1975) ECR 1393

5 Sec the judgment of 17 January 1985 in Case 11/82 Piraiki Patruki v Commiaion [1985] ECR 227 paragraph 14

6 Sec the judgment of 14 July 1983 in Case 231/82 Spijker Kwasten v Commission [1983] ECR 2559 paragraph 10 and of 6 October 1982 in Case 307/81 Alumine v Council and Commission [1982] ECR 3463

7 Thus it appears from the order of 6 May 1988 of the President of the Court concerning an application for interim measures in Case 111/88 R that the exportation of citrus fruit accounts for only 0.0245% of the total value of Greek exports (see paragraphs 17 and 18 of the order)

8 See the judgment of 10 July 1986 in Case 234/84 Belgium v Commission [1986] ECR 2263 paragraph 27

9 See the judgment of 11 November 1987 in Case 259/85 France v Commission [1987] ECR 4393 paragraph 12