Opinion of Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered on 9 November 1989

1 Original language: Italian.

2 OJ 1981, L 4, p. 1.

3 OJ 1981, L 4, p. 43.

4 OJL291, 19.11.1979, p. 17.

5 OJ 1980, C 259, p. 1.

6 See judgments of 25 January 1979 in Case 98/78 Racke v Hatiptzollamt Mainz [1979] ECR 69, paragraph 15, and of 25 January 1979 ¡n Case 99/78 Decker v Hauplzollamt Landau [1979] ECR 101, paragraph 3.

7 Sec ludgmcnts of 14 July 1983 m Casc 224/82 Mako-Konierven/abnk [1983] ECR 2539, paragraph 12, of 30 September 1982 in Case 114/81 Tunnel Refinería [1982] F.CR 3189, paragraph 4, of 30 September 1982 in Case 110/81 Roquait Frères [1982] ECR 3159, paragraph 5, of 30 September 1982 in Case 108/81 Amylum [1982] ECR 3107, paragraph 4, of 19 May 1982 in Case 84/81 Staple Dairy Producís Lid v Inlervcnlion Board /or Agricultural Produce [1982] ECR 1763, paragraph 12, of 12 November 1981 in Joined Cases 212 to 217/80 Salumi [1981] ECR 2735, paragraph 10, and the judgments in Decker mentioned above, paragraph 8, and Rackc, paragraph 20.

8 Sec in particular judgments of 28 October 1982 in Case 52/81 Faust v Comminimi [19821 ECR 3745, paragraph 27, of 15 July 1982 in Case 245/81 Edeka [1982] ECR 2745, paragraph 27, the abovementioned Staple Dairy Producís ludgment, paragraph 15, of 13 June 1978 in Case 146/77 British Bee/Company Ltd v Intervention Board /or Agricultural Produce [1978] ECR 1347. paragraph 13. of I February 1978 in Case 78/77 LUhrs v Hauptzollami Flambiirg-fonas [1978] ECR 169, paragraph 6, and of 8 June 1977 in Case 97/76 Merkur Aimenbandel Gmbh and Co KG (1977) ECR 1063, paragraph 9.

9 See Opinion in Cases 44 to 51/77 (judgment of 26 January 1978) Union Malt v Commission [1978] ECR 57, al p. 91.

10 OJ 1979, L 175. p 1

11 Judgments of 14 November 1985 in Case 299/84 Neumann v BALM [1985] ECR 3663, paragraph 12, and of 3 Oclober 1985 in Case 311/84 CBFM [1985) ECR 3261. paragraph 10.