Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 26 September 1991

1 Original language: French.

2 Council Regulation (EEC) No 590/85 of 26 February 1985 amending Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 (OJ 1985 L 68, p. 1).

3 Judgment in Case 5/88 Wachauf v Bundesamt Jur Ernährung und Forstwirtschaft [1989] ECR 2609.

4 Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 of 16 May 1984 laying detailed rula for the application of the additional levy retened to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 (OJ 1984 L 112, p. 11).

5 See in particular the judgment in Case 84/87 Erpelding v Secrétaire d'État à la Viticulture [1988] ECR 2647 at p. 2673.

6 See in particular the jucteemem in Caie 266/84 DnJkavit Fnma v Fornt [1986] ECK 170, paragraph 27.

7 Judgment in Cue C-350/88 Meat md Othm v Commotion [1990] ECR I-395, paragraphs 33 and 34.

8 In the version in force following Council Regulation (EEC) No 590/85 of 26 February 1985 amending Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 (OJ 1985 L 68, p. 1).

9 At amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1043/85 of 24 April 1985 amending for the ninth time Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 (OJ 1985 L 112, p. 18).

10 Commitaon Regulation (EEC) No 1 Me/88 of ) hue 1988 laying down neural rules for tbe appbeation of the additional hrry referred co in Anide Sc of Regulación (EEC) No 804/68 (OJ 1988 L 139, p. 12).