Opinion of Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered on 10 December 1991

1 Original language: French.

2 Case T-46/89 [1990] ECR II-577.

3 ... the applicant never held the post of Head of Specialized Department XXI-01, but that of the person responsible for data processing in DG XXI, as he admits in his reply; judgment of the Court of First Instance, cited above, paragraph 27; see also the text of the decision of U November 1987, in Annex I to the response: three units are established, directly attached to the Director-General: — Specialized Department XXI-01 computerization and data processing will take over some of the tasks of former division XXI/A/3... Mr Walker... is... appointed Head of the new Specialized Department XXI-01.

4 Page 4 of the appeal.

5 On disciplinary proceedings.

6 See on this point the Opinion of Mr Advocate General Tesauro in the Schwedler case, paragraph 2 (Case C-132/90 P [1991] ECR 5745).

7 Judgment of 7 March 1990, paragraphs 10 to 16 (Joined Cases C-116/88 and C-149/88 [1990] ECR I-599, at p. 625).

8 Paragraph 43 of the judgment of the Court of Fist Instance.

9 Paragraph 61 of the judgment of the Court of First Instance.

10 Paragraph 26 of the judgment of the Court of First Instance.