Judgment of the Court of Hra Instance (Fifth Chamber) 28 January 1992

In Case T-45/90,

THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber), composed of: K. Lenaerts, President, D. Barrington and H. Kirschner, Judges, Registrar: H. Jung,

having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 9 October 1991,

gives the following

Judgment

The facts

Procedure

The forms of order sought by the parties

Admissibility

1. The claim for annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant of 31 May 1990

2. The claim that the applicant should be reinstated

Substance

1. The daim for annulment of the decision dismissing the applicant of of 12 July 1990

The first plea in law: infringement of a fundamental right for the protection of pregnant women

The second plea in law: failure to give the prescribed notice

The third plea in law: infringement of Article 11 of the Bureau's Recruitment Rules and of the Group's Rules of Procedure, in particular Article 9

The fourth plea: lack of a statement of reasons

2. The claim in the alternative for, first, a declaration that the dismissals are unfair; secondly, for compensation for the material and nonmaterial damage allegedly suffered; and, thirdly, for the appointment, if necessary, of an expert to evaluate that damage

Costs

1 Language of the case: French.