Opinion of Advocate General Darmon delivered on 16 June 1994

1 Original language: French.

2 Uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) (Classification of goods) (92/C 34/03), OJ 1992 C 34, p. 2 (emphasis added).

3 See, in that connection, the judgments in Case 166/84 Thomasdünger v Oberfinanzdirektion Frankfurt am Main [1985] ECR 3001, paragraph 13, Case 200/84 Daiber v Hauptzollamt Reutlingen [1985] ECR 3363, paragraph 13, Case C-177/91 Bioforce [1993] ECR I-45, paragraph 8, and in Case C-11/93 Siemens Nixdorf [1994] ECR I-1945, paragraph 11.

4 Judgment in Thomasdünger, cited above, paragraph 14.

5 Judgment in Case 149/73 Witt v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Ericas [1973] ECR 1587, paragraph 3.

6 Emphasis added.

7 Judgment in Case 28/70 Wilt v Haiiptzollamt Lüneburg [1970] ECR 1021, paragraph 6.

8 Emphasis added.

9 Judgment in Case 28/70 Will, paragraph 5.