lagen.nu
no. 55517/10

Prodanof v. Romania

Struck out of the list

Domstol
European Court of Human Rights
Avgörandedatum
2014-10-07
ECLI
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1007DEC005551710
Artiklar
6, 6-1, 37, 37-1
Källa
hudoc.echr.coe.int

Berörda konventionsartiklar

THIRD SECTION

Application no. 55517/10 Nicolae PRODANOF against Romania

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7 October 2014 as a Committee composed of:

Alvina Gyulumyan, President, Johannes Silvis, Valeriu Griţco, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 5 August 2010,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Mr Nicolae Prodanof, is a Romanian and Brazilian national, who was born in 1942 and lives in São Paulo. He was represented before the Court by Ms T. Dan, a lawyer practising in Bucharest.

The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms C. Brumar, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the civil proceedings in which he had been involved.

This complaint was communicated to the Government, who expressed their intention to settle the case and submitted a declaration to that effect. The applicant’s representative was invited to submit his position concerning the friendly settlement of the case before 26 May 2014, but failed to do so. Moreover, he failed to respond to the registered letter dated 1 July 2014 drawing his attention to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

THE LAW

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Marialena Tsirli Alvina Gyulumyan Deputy Registrar President