Burján and Others v. Hungary
Struck out of the list
Berörda konventionsartiklar
FIRST SECTION
Application no. 10094/24 Imre BURJÁN against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 3 October 2024 as a Committee composed of:
Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President , Lətif Hüseynov, Erik Wennerström , judges,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 24 October 2024.
Attila Teplán Krzysztof Wojtyczek Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of criminal proceedings)
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros) [1]
10094/24
13/03/2024
Imre BURJÁN
1971
Fahidi Gergely
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
16/08/2024
20/06/2024
5,500
10173/24
12/03/2024
Andrásné BUDAI
1979
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
05/07/2024
2,300
10183/24
12/03/2024
Vivien BUDAI
1997
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
05/07/2024
2,300
10690/24
13/03/2024
András BURJÁN
1977
Fahidi Gergely
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
16/08/2024
20/06/2024
2,300
10886/24
25/03/2024
Tibor Richárd BELOVAY
1990
Frank Evelyn
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
28/08/2024
05/07/2024
3,300
10898/24
25/03/2024
István BELOVAY
1966
Frank Evelyn
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
28/08/2024
10/07/2024
3,900
11262/24
09/04/2024
Attila TÓTH
1974
Nagy Gábor
Budapest
28/08/2024
17/07/2024
2,000
11625/24
25/03/2024
Csaba SZÉPVÖLGYI
1980
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
27/06/2024
3,900
11753/24
13/04/2024
Mihály SIMON
1994
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
23/07/2024
2,600
12105/24
15/04/2024
Zsolt VARGA
1982
Kiss Gábor H.
Budapest
28/08/2024
14/08/2024
4,600
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.