Győrfi and Others v. Hungary
Struck out of the list
Berörda konventionsartiklar
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 26210/24 Gábor GYŐRFI against Hungary and 9 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 24 April 2025 as a Committee composed of:
Gediminas Sagatys , President , Stéphane Pisani, Juha Lavapuro , judges ,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 15 May 2025.
Attila Teplán Gediminas Sagatys Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of criminal proceedings)
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros) [1]
26210/24
26/08/2024
Gábor GYŐRFI
1984
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
19/03/2025
21/03/2025
3,300
27051/24
09/09/2024
István MAKA
1974
Hatlaczki Gyula
Nagykáta
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/03/2025
27/11/2024
5,200
27052/24
09/09/2024
Erzsébet PLÉS
1973
Hatlaczki Gyula
Nagykáta
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/03/2025
27/11/2024
5,200
27053/24
09/09/2024
István MAKA
1992
Hatlaczki Gyula
Nagykáta
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/03/2025
27/11/2024
5,200
28149/24
05/09/2024
Roland DRÓTOS
1988
N. Tóth Máté
Budapest
19/03/2025
06/12/2024
2,000
28987/24
20/09/2024
Dávid DECSI
1992
Finta Eszter Klára
Budapest
17/03/2025
29/11/2024
2,600
30644/24
08/10/2024
Dániel DEMETER
1991
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/03/2025
08/01/2025
3,900
33296/24
30/10/2024
Zoltán SZILÁGYI
1994
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/03/2025
27/02/2025
4,100
35760/24
21/11/2024
Attila NÉDÓ
1991
Frank Evelyn
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/03/2025
03/03/2025
2,300
36949/24
04/12/2024
Csaba SURMAN
1974
Nagy Gábor
Budapest
17/03/2025
18/02/2025
3,600
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.