Hajduné Korbeli and Others v. Hungary
Struck out of the list
Berörda konventionsartiklar
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 31793/24 Ágnes Anna HAJDUNÉ KORBELI against Hungary and 9 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 3 July 2025 as a Committee composed of:
Gediminas Sagatys , President , Stéphane Pisani, Juha Lavapuro , judges ,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 28 August 2025.
Attila Teplán Gediminas Sagatys Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of criminal proceedings)
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros) [1]
31793/24
17/10/2024
Ágnes Anna HAJDUNÉ KORBELI
1969
Nagy Gábor
Budapest
07/05/2025
20/01/2025
4,800
32920/24
30/10/2024
Gabriella LAKATOS
1965
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
16/05/2025
10/02/2025
3,300
33100/24
21/10/2024
Tibor Norbert GONDY
1999
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
16/05/2025
11/02/2025
3,300
33385/24
07/11/2024
Yamal LAHOO
1987
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
02/04/2025
16/05/2025
2,600
585/25
17/12/2024
László TAKÁCS
1985
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
27/05/2025
01/04/2025
2,400
613/25
21/12/2024
Ildikó MUDRA
1963
Holló József
Budapest
12/05/2025
21/03/2025
2,000
779/25
21/12/2024
József KISPÁL
1980
Holló József
Budapest
12/05/2025
21/03/2025
1,200
1970/25
02/12/2024
Károly MEDGYESI
1953
Fahidi Gergely
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
12/05/2025
15/04/2025
8,200
2309/25
21/12/2024
Henrietta HEINRICH
1984
Holló József
Budapest
12/05/2025
21/03/2025
1,200
2350/25
21/12/2024
Márta DÖMSÖDI
1978
Holló József
Budapest
12/05/2025
21/03/2025
1,200
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.