Strumiński v. Poland

FIRST SECTION

Application no. 14625/22 Paweł STRUMIŃSKI against Poland

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18 June 2026 as a Committee composed of:

Raffaele Sabato , President , Artūrs Kučs, Anna Adamska-Gallant , judges ,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 1 March 2022,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table. He was represented by Ms S. Gregorczyk-Abram, a lawyer practising in Warsaw.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the composition of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court in the applicant’s case and the reasonableness of the length of the disciplinary proceedings brought against him, and under Article 8 of the Convention, concerning the alleged damage to the applicant’s reputation were communicated to the Polish Government (“the Government”).

The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 9 July 2026.

Viktoriya Maradudina Raffaele Sabato Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention

(tribunal established by law, excessive length of disciplinary proceedings and protection of reputation)

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Date of receipt of

Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration

Amount awarded for pecuniary and

non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

14625/22

01/03/2022

Paweł STRUMIŃSKI

1974

Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram

Warsaw

17/04/2026

10/03/2026

12,000

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.