identifier: AMC & GM to Annex I (Definitions) — Issue 1, Amendment 12

beslut: ED Decision 2021/002/R

publisher: Europeiska unionens byrå för luftfartssäkerhet

sprak: en

serie: amc-gm

text: AMC and GM to Part-DEF of Annex I to ED Decision 2021/002/R

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

type: stycke

text: ‘Acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Annex I (Definitions) — Issue 1, Amendment 12’

type: rubrik

text: The Annex to ED Decision N° 2012/015/Directorate R of 24 October 2012 is hereby amended as follows: The text of the amendment is arranged to show deleted text, new or amended text as shown below: (a) deleted text is struck through; (b) new or amended text is highlighted in blue; (c) an ellipsis (…) indicates that the remaining text is unchanged.

text: AMC and GM to Part-DEF of

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: GM2 Annex I Definitions

text: ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS (…) APP approach CLB climb COM communication (EBT competency) CRZ cruise DES descent EBT evidence-based training EVAL evaluation phase FPA flight path management — automation (EBT competency) FPM flight path management — manual control (EBT competency) GND ground ISI in-seat instruction KNO application of knowledge (EBT competency) LDG landing LOC-I loss of control in-flight LTW leadership and teamwork (EBT competency) MT manoeuvres training phase OB observable behaviour PRO application of procedures (EBT competency) PSD problem-solving & decision-making (EBT competency) SAW situation awareness (EBT competency) SBT scenario-based training TO take-off UPRT upset prevention and recovery training WLM workload management (EBT competency) (…)

text: Annex I to ED Decision 2021/002/R Page 2 of 4

text: AMC and GM to Part-DEF of

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: GM19 Annex I Definitions

text: EVIDENCE-BASED TRAINING ‘Behaviour’ refers to the way a person responds, either overtly or covertly, to a specific set of conditions, and which is capable of being measured. ‘Instructor concordance’ is also called ‘inter-rater reliability’. ‘Conditions’ refers to anything that may qualify a specific environment in which performance will be demonstrated. ‘Cycle’ refers to the combination of two modules where Cycle 1 comprises Modules 1 and 2, Cycle 2 comprises Modules 3 and 4, and Cycle 3 comprises Modules 5 and 6 of the 3-year EBT programme. ‘Equivalency of approaches’ refers to approach clustering in other industry documentation. ‘Equivalency of malfunctions’ refers to malfunction clustering in other industry documentation. ‘Evaluation phase (EVAL)’ refers to the phase where a first assessment of competencies is performed in order to identify individual training needs. On completion of the evaluation phase, any areas that do not meet the minimum competency standard will become the focus of the subsequent training. The evaluation phase comprises a complete mission as a crew but not necessarily a complete flight. ‘Facilitation technique’ refers to an active training method, which uses effective questioning, listening and a non-judgemental approach, and is particularly effective in developing skills and attitudes, assisting trainees in developing insight and their own solutions, resulting in better understanding, retention and commitment. ‘Line-orientated flight scenario(s)’ are comprised of scenario elements derived from the table of assessment and training topics. ‘Line-orientated safety audit (LOSA)’ is one of the tools used to help evaluate the performance of the operations. It consists of line flights that are observed by appropriately qualified operator personnel to provide feedback to validate the EBT programme. LOSA may be one of the tools used to look at those elements of the operation that are unable to be monitored by FDM or Advanced FDM programmes. ‘Manoeuvres training phase’ refers to the phase where skill retention is trained (body memory actions). Flight path control may be accomplished by a variety of means including manual aircraft control and the use of auto flight systems. ‘Monitoring’ refers to a cognitive process to compare an actual to an expected state. It requires knowledge, skills and attitudes to create a mental model and to take appropriate action when deviations are recognised. ‘Observable behaviour (OB)’ refers to a single role-related behaviour that can be observed. The instructor may or may not be able to measure it. ‘Performance criteria’ refers to statements used to assess whether the required levels of performance have been achieved for a competency. A performance criterion consists of an OB, a condition (or conditions) and a competency standard.

text: Annex I to ED Decision 2021/002/R Page 3 of 4

text: AMC and GM to Part-DEF of

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: ‘Practical assessment (or EBT practical assessment)’ refers to a method for assessing performance that serves to verify the integrated performance of competencies. It takes place in either a simulated or an operational environment. An EBT assessment is equivalent to a proficiency check and is performed under the instructor privilege in the context of proficiency check in accordance with Appendix 10 to Part-FCL. More information can be found in ICAO Doc 9868 ‘PANS-TRG’. ‘Scenario-based training phase (SBT)’ refers to the largest phase in the EBT programme. It is designed to maximise crew’s exposure to a variety of situations that develop and sustain a high level of competency and resilience. The scenario for this phase should include critical external and environmental threats, to build effective crew interaction to identify and manage errors. A portion of the phase will also be directed towards the management of critical system malfunctions. Scenario elements address the training topic and detail the threat and/or error that the crew are exposed to. ‘Train-to-proficiency’ refers to approved training designed to achieve end-state performance objectives, providing sufficient assurance that the trained individual is capable of consistently carrying out specific tasks safely and effectively. Note: In the context of this definition, ‘train-to-proficiency’ can be replaced by ‘training-to-proficiency’.

text: Annex I to ED Decision 2021/002/R Page 4 of 4

type: vagledning

utgivare: easa


text: o The Annex to Decision N 2011/016/R of 15 December 2011 of the Executive Director of the Agency is amended as follows:

identifier: AMC and GM to Annex I (Part-FCL) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 — Issue 1, Amendment 12

beslut: ED Decision 2022/014/R

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R ‘AMC & GM to Annex I (Part-FCL) to

text: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011

text: — Issue 1, Amendment 12’

text: The text of the amendment is arranged to show deleted, new or amended text as shown below: (a) deleted text is struck through; (b) new or amended text is highlighted in blue; (c) an ellipsis ‘[…]’ indicates that the rest of the text is unchanged. Note to the reader In amended, and in particular in existing (that is, unchanged) text, ‘Agency’ is used interchangeably with ‘EASA’. The interchangeable use of these two terms is more apparent in the consolidated versions. Therefore, please note that both terms refer to the ‘European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)’.

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 1 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: GM6 FCL.010 Definitions

text: (a) For the purpose of crediting of a pilot’s prior experience, ‘multi-pilot operation’ can be understood to include State aircraft operations (such as military or search & rescue) where two pilots are required by the applicable national regulations, the relevant operations manual or an equivalent document. (b) Operations under Annex VII (Part-NCO) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: are not under the ‘multi-pilot operation’ category, except for operations at an ATO for the purpose of providing training in multi-pilot operations, in accordance with the training manual of the ATO.

text: AMC1 FCL.050 Recording of flight time

text: GENERAL

text: […] (b) Logging of time: (1) PIC flight time: (i) the holder of a licence may log as PIC time all of the flight time during which he or she is the PIC; (ii) the applicant for, or the holder of, a pilot licence may log as PIC time all solo flight time, flight time as SPIC and flight time under supervision provided that such SPIC time and flight time under supervision are countersigned by the instructor; (iii) the holder of an instructor certificate may log as PIC all flight time during which he or she acts as an instructor in an aircraft; (iv) the holder of an examiner’s certificate may log as PIC all flight time during which he or she occupies a pilot’s seat and acts as an examiner in an aircraft; (v) a co-pilot acting as PICUS on an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or as required by operational requirements provided that such PICUS time is countersigned by the PIC; (vi) if the holder of a pilot licence carries out a number of flights upon the same day returning on each occasion to the same place of departure and the interval between successive flights does not exceed 30 minutes, such series of flights may be recorded as a single entry.; (vii) where

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: requires the pilot to act as PIC under the supervision of another pilot (supervisor), both the pilot and the supervisor may log the flight time as PIC.

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 2 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: (2) co-pilot flight time: the holder of a pilot licence occupying a pilot seat as co-pilot may log all flight time as co-pilot flight time on an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft, or the regulations or the operations manual of the operator under which the flight is conducted; […]

text: INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

text: […] (i) Notes on recording of flight time: […] (10) column 12: the ‘remarks’ column may be used to record details of the flight at the holder’s discretion. The following entries, however, should always be made: (i) instrument flight time undertaken as part of the training for a licence or rating; (ii) details of all skill tests and proficiency checks; (iii) name and signature of PIC if the pilot is recording flight time as SPIC or PICUS; (iv) name and signature of instructor if flight is part of an SEP or TMG class rating revalidation.; (v) for multi-pilot operations in single-pilot helicopters, the form of operation, name and signature of the examiner conducting the skill test or proficiency check or operator proficiency check, and the name of the operator in the case of the operator proficiency check. […]

text: GM1 FCL.050 Recording of flight time

text: EXAMPLES FOR THE USE OF COLUMN 12 ‘REMARKS’ OF THE PILOT LOGBOOK

text: Pilots may use column 12 ‘remarks’ of the pilot logbook (AMC1 FCL.050) to record the specific nature of a particular flight in the following cases, since a record of relevant experience might be useful with respect to operational requirements: (a) flight time as a pilot in a specialised operation, using the list provided in GM1 NCO.SPEC.100 and GM1 SPO.GEN.100 (see AMC1 ORO.FC.146(e);(f)&(g) of the AMC and GM to Annex III (Part- ORO) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: — ED Decision 2014/017/R); (b) HEC 1 and 2 cycles, HESLO 1, 2, 3, and 4 cycles, and HHO hoisting cycles by day and night, as pilot flying (see AMC1 SPO.SPEC.HEC.100 and AMC1 SPO.SPEC.HESLO.100 of the AMC and GM to Annex VIII (Part-SPO) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: — ED Decision 2014/018/R, and point SPA.HHO.130 of Annex V (Part-SPA) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: ); (c) HHO hours (see point SPA.HHO.130 of Part-SPA); (d) offshore landings by day / by night, as pilot flying (see point SPA.HOFO.170 of Part-SPA);

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 3 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: (e) NVIS flights or hours (see GM1 SPA.NVIS.130 of the AMC and GM to Annex V (Part-SPA) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: — ED Decision 2012/019/R); (f) IFR approaches in the single-pilot role (see point ORO.FC.202 of Annex III (Part-ORO) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: ); (g) any activity deemed necessary to be recorded for evidence purposes. Pilots may also use column 12 ‘remarks’ to record IFR approaches exercising PBN privileges and RNP APCH approaches in single-pilot operations (see Appendix 8 to Annex I (Part-FCL)).

text: GM1 FCL.520.A ATPL(A) — Skill test

text: ATPL SKILL TEST IN AN EBT MODULE

text: The skill test in accordance with Appendix 9 may be combined with an EBT module. It may follow the same process already described in mixed EBT for the LPC (e.g. EVAL + manoeuvres validation phase for the pilot performing the ATPL skill test). The same rationale can be applied to the regular skill test. Guidance can be found in the EASA EBT manual. The competent authority may provide additional and further guidance.

text: AMC1 FCL.510.H(f) ATPL(H) — Prerequisites, experience and crediting

text: MCC TRAINING WITH CREDITS FOR ATPL(H) — PILOTS THAT ARE EXPERIENCED IN MULTI-PILOT OPERATIONS

text: (a) General MCC training in accordance with point FCL.510.H(f) is intended to be completed by applicants who are undergoing integrated ATPL(H) training. (b) Training course The training course should include theoretical training instruction and exercises, as well as practical MCC training using one of the following helicopter simulators: (1) FNPT II or III qualified for MCC; (2) an FTD 2/3; (3) an FFS. (c) Objectives The training course should meet the objectives of AMC1 FCL.735.A; FCL.735.H; FCL.735.As. The head of training of the ATO should adapt the duration of training to the individual needs of the applicant, in order to achieve these objectives. (d) Certificate of completion On completion of the course, once the applicant has met the objectives defined in (c), the applicant should receive a certificate of completion of the training from the ATO. The form

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 4 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: should be based on that defined in AMC1 FCL.735.A; FCL.735.H; FCL.735.As. The title of the form should read ‘Training in accordance with FCL.510(f) — helicopters’.

text: AMC1 FCL.630.H IR(H) — Extension of the privileges of an IR(H) to further helicopter types

text: APPROPRIATE FFS OR FTD The appropriate FSTD should be a FFS C/D or a FTD 2/3.

text: AMC1 FCL.725(a) Requirements for the issue of class and type ratings

text: SYLLABUS OF THEORETICAL KNOWLEDGE FOR CLASS OR TYPE RATINGS I. SE AND ME AEROPLANES […] (f) Special requirements for extension of a type rating for instrument approaches down to decision heights of less than 200 ft (60 m): (1) airborne and ground equipment: (i) technical requirements; (ii) operational requirements; (iii) operational reliability; (iv) fail operational; (v) fail passive; (vi) equipment reliability; (vii) operating procedures; (viii) preparatory measures; (ix) operational downgrading; (x) communications. (2) procedures and limitations: (i) operational procedures; (ii) crew coordination. (gf) Special requirements for ‘glass cockpit’ aeroplanes with EFIS Aadditional learning objectives: (1) general rules of aeroplanes computer hardware and software design; (2) logic of all crew information and alerting systems and their limitations;

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 5 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: (3) interaction of the different aeroplane computer systems, their limitations, the possibilities of computer fault recognition and the actions to be performed on computer failures; (4) normal procedures including all crew coordination duties; (5) aeroplane operation with different computer degradations (basic flying). (hg) Flight management systems. II. SE AND ME HELICOPTERS […] (f) Special requirements for extension of a type rating for instrument approaches down to a decision height of less than 200 ft (60 m): (1) airborne and ground equipment: (i) technical requirements; (ii) operational requirements; (iii) operational reliability; (iv) fail operational; (v) fail passive; (vi) equipment reliability; (vii) operating procedures; (viii) preparatory measures; (ix) operational downgrading; (x) communication. (2) Procedures and limitations: (i) operational procedures; (ii) crew co-ordination. (gf) Special requirements for helicopters with EFIS. (hg) Optional equipment. […]

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 6 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: AMC2 FCL.725(a) Requirements for the issue of class and type ratings

text: TRAINING COURSE FLIGHT INSTRUCTION FOR TYPE RATINGS: HELICOPTERS

text: (a) The amount of flight instruction depends on: (i) complexity of the helicopter type, handling characteristics, level of technology; (ii) category of helicopter (SEP or SE turbine helicopter, ME turbine and MP helicopter); (iii) previous experience of the applicant; (iv) the availability of FSTDs. (b) FSTDs In accordance with Appendix 9 to Part-FCL Section A paragraph 1 third subparagraph, Tthe level of qualification and the complexity of the type will determine the amount of practical training that may be accomplished in FSTDs, including completion of the skill test. Before undertaking the skill test, a student should demonstrate competency in the skill test items during the practical training. (c) Initial issue The flight instruction (excluding skill test) should comprise training time as specified in column 2 in the table below unless otherwise foreseen in the operational suitability data established in accordance with Annex I (Part 21) to

text: Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012

text: (OSD). If, in accordance with Appendix 9 to Part-FCL Section A paragraph 1 third subparagraph, training is conducted in a combination of FSTDs (other than FFS) and the helicopter, the in-aircraft training time will depend on the specificities of the FSTD used. In such a case, in-aircraft training time should comprise, as a minimum, the training time given in column 3 of the table below unless otherwise foreseen in the OSD.:

text: (1) (2) (3) Helicopter types In helicopter In helicopter and FSTD associated training Credits Minimum Minimum training time in the helicopter, when also using FSTDs other than training FFS time SEP(H) 5 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 2 hrs helicopter and at least 6 hrs total Using FTD 2/3: At least 4 hrs helicopter and at least 6 hrs total SET(H) under 3 175 kg 5 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 2 hrs helicopter and at least 6 hrs total MTOM Using FTD 2/3: At least 4 hrs helicopter and at least 6 hrs total SET(H) at or over 3 175 kg 8 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 2 hrs helicopter and at least 10 hrs total MTOM Using FTD 2/3: At least 4 hrs helicopter and at least 10 hrs total SPH MET (H) CS and FAR 8 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 2 hrs helicopter and at least 10 hrs total 27 and 29 Using FTD 2/3: At least 4 hrs helicopter and at least 10 hrs total 5 hrs Using FTD2/3: At least 2 hrs in the helicopter MPH, when the applicant has already completed:

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 7 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: - MCC course; - 50 hours of flight time in multipilot operations in SPH MPH 10 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 2 hrs helicopter, and at least 12 hrs total Using FTD 2/3: At least 4 hrs helicopter, and at least 12 hrs total

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 8 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: (d) Additional types The flight instruction (excluding the skill test) should comprise training time as specified in column 2 in the table below unless otherwise foreseen in the OSD. If, in accordance with Appendix 9 to Part-FCL Section A paragraph 1 third subparagraph, training is conducted in a combination of FSTDs (other than FFS) and the helicopter, the in-aircraft training time will depend on the specificities of the FSTD used. In such a case, in-aircraft training time should comprise, as a minimum, the time given in column 3 of the table below unless otherwise foreseen in the OSD.:

text: (1) (2) (3) Helicopter types In helicopter In helicopter and FSTD associated training Credits Minimum Minimum training time in the helicopter, when also using FSTDs other than training FFS time SEP(H) to SEP(H) within 2 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 1 hr helicopter and at least 3 hrs total AMC1 FCL.740.H(a)(3) Using FTD 2/3: At least 1 hr helicopter and at least 4 hrs total SEP(H) to SEP(H) not 5 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 1 hr helicopter and at least 6 hrs total included in Using FTD 2/3: At least 2 hrs helicopter and at least 7 hrs total AMC1 FCL.740.H(a)(3) SET(H) to SET(H) 2 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 1 hr helicopter and at least 3 hrs total Using FTD 2/3: At least 1 hr helicopter and at least 4 hrs total SE difference training 1 hr N/A MET(H) to MET(H) 3 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 1 hr helicopter and at least 4 hrs total Using FTD 2/3: At least 2 hrs helicopter and at least 5 hrs total ME difference 1 hrs N/A training MPH to MPH 5 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 1 hr helicopter and at least 6 hrs total Using FTD 2/3: At least 2 hrs helicopter and at least 7 hrs total Extend privileges on the 2 hrs Using FFS C/D: At least 1 hr helicopter and at least 3 hrs total N/A same type rating from SPH to MPH (except for initial MP issue), or from MPH to SPH Extend privileges on the 1 hr Training in helicopter or FFS C/D same type rating from SPH to MPH (except for initial MP issue), when applicants have completed 50 hours of flight time in multi-pilot operations on that type

text: (e) Holders of an IR(H) wishing to extend the IR(H) to further types should have additionally 2 hours flight training on type by sole reference to instruments according to IFR which may be conducted in an FFS C/D or FTD 2/3. Holders of an SE IR(H) wishing to extend the IR privileges to an ME IR(H) for the first time should complete at least 5 hours training.

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 9 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: GM1 FCL.725(d)(4)(ii)(B)(2) Requirements for the issue of class and type ratings

text: MULTI-PILOT OPERATION IN SINGLE-PILOT HELICOPTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANNEX III (PART- ORO) TO REGULATION

text: (EU) No 965/2012

text: Point FCL.725(d)(4)(ii)(B)(2) requires pilots to exercise their type rating privileges for multi-pilot operation in single-pilot helicopters only in accordance with the requirements of Part-ORO. Multi-pilot operations in single-pilot helicopters cannot be carried out under Part-NCO. The regulatory framework of Part-ORO applies in any case of commercial operations or operation of complex single-pilot helicopters under

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: . This means that an ATO that provides training for multi-pilot operation in single-pilot helicopters will need to base that training on the operational procedures of the operator for which the pilot is flying. That ATO will either be an operator itself or will have an arrangement with an operator on behalf of which the training will be carried out.

text: GM1 FCL.740.A Revalidation of class and type ratings — aeroplanes

text: COMPLETE EBT PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX 10

text: (a) The completion of an EBT practical assessment includes: (1) the assessment of pilot performance either in a simulated or an operational environment; and (2) the administrative action which includes the completion of the Appendix 10 form. (b) The assessment as per point (1) usually occurs during the entire validity period of the rating as the EBT programme includes several FSTD sessions, while the administrative action as per point (2) is completed within the 3 months immediately preceding the expiry date of the rating.

text: AMC1 FCL.740.H(a)(3) Revalidation of type ratings – helicopters

text: CREDITING OF THE PROFICIENCY CHECK TOWARDS SEP HELICOPTER TYPES

text: Only the following SEP helicopter types can be considered for crediting of the proficiency check. Other SEP helicopters (for example, the R22 and R44) should not be given credit for.

text: Manufacturer Helicopter type and licence endorsement Agusta-Bell SEP Bell47 Bell Helicopters SEP Bell47

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 10 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: Brantley SEP Brantley B2 Breda Nardi SEP HU269 Enstrom SEP ENF28 Hélicoptères Guimbal SEP Cabri G2 Hiller SEP UH12 Hughes or Schweizer SEP HU269 Westland SEP Bell47 Manufacturer SEP Helicopter type Agusta-Bell Bell47 Bell Helicopters Bell47 Westland Bell47 Brantley Brantley B2 Enstrom ENF28 Hélicoptères Guimbal Cabri G2 Hiller UH12 Robinson R44

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 11 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: Hughes or Schweizer HU269 Breda Nardi HU269

text: GM1 to Appendix 10 — Revalidation and renewal of type ratings, and revalidation and renewal of IRs when combined with the revalidation or renewal of type ratings — EBT practical assessment

text: REVALIDATION AND RENEWAL OF TYPE RATING — ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

text: […] (e) The requirements for completion of the operator’s EBT programme (see the form set out in AMC1 to Appendix 10) can be found in point ORO.FC.231(a)(3) of Annex III (Part-ORO) to

text: Regulation (EU) 965/2012

text: and include, as a minimum, the completion of: (1) a minimum of two EBT modules; (2) line evaluation(s) of competence. In the case of renewal of a type rating, the line evaluation of competence can be performed only when the pilot has their type rating renewed; and (3) ground training. (f) The EBT programme includes equivalencies of approaches (point ORO.FC.231(g)) and determines the necessary training frequency for particular approaches. Therefore, pilots can maintain their PBN privileges when completing an EBT programme. Additionally, in the case of specific approaches related to PBN which require a specific approval in accordance with Subpart B of Annex V (Part-SPA) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

text: , the requirements of that Subpart (SPA.PBN) apply.

text: GM2 to Appendix 10 — Revalidation and renewal of type ratings, and revalidation and renewal of IRs when combined with the revalidation or renewal of type ratings – EBT practical assessment

text: EBT PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT — PROFICIENCY CHECK

text: EBT practical assessment (or Practical assessment) is defined in FCL.010. More information can be found in ICAO Doc 9868 ‘PANS-TRG’. (a) The demonstration of skills to revalidate or renew referred to in the definition of ‘proficiency check’ in point FCL.010 is equivalent to the EBT practical assessments conducted in the EBT programme and the final review of the examiner. In fact, one single EBT practical assessment demonstrates the necessary skills performed in legacy training; however, EBT goes one step further — to revalidate or renew, the pilot performs at least two demonstrations, corresponding to at least two EBT modules within the validity period of the type rating.

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 12 of 13

text: AMC & GM to Part-FCL

text: Issue 1, Amendment 12

text: (b) A proficiency check is equivalent to the combination of the evaluation phase (EVAL) and manoeuvres training phase (MT). However, EBT also requires a scenario-based training phase (SBT) following the EVAL to complete the module.

text: Annex VII to ED Decision 2022/014/R Page 13 of 13