text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2021/009/R

text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2021/009/R

text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2021/009/R

text: EASA FORM 1 OR EQUIVALENT

text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2021/009/R

identifier: AMC & GM to Part-ML — Issue 1, Amendment 1

beslut: ED Decision 2021/009/R

publisher: Europeiska unionens byrå för luftfartssäkerhet

sprak: en

serie: amc-gm

text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2021/009/R

type: rubrik

text: Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM)

type: stycke

text: to Annex Vb (Part-ML) to

text: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014

text: Issue 1 — Amendment 1

text: Annex VI to Decision 2020/002/R is amended as follows: The text of the amendment is arranged to show deleted text, new or amended text as shown below: — deleted text is struck through; — new or amended text is highlighted in blue; — an ellipsis ‘[…]’ indicates that the rest of the text is unchanged.

text: SECTION A - TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

text: SUBPART C — CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS

text: AMC1 ML.A.302(d) Aircraft maintenance programme

text: This AMC contains an acceptable MIP for aeroplanes of 2 730 kg maximum take-off mass (MTOM) and below, and for ELA2 aircraft other than rotorcraft or airships, grouped in the following categories: — aeroplanes of 2 730 kg MTOM and below; — ELA2 sailplanes and ELA2 powered sailplanes; and — ELA2 balloons.

text: SUBPART D — MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

text: GM1 ML.A.401(b) Maintenance data

text: Similar provisions to those in GM1 M.A.401(b)(3) and (b)(4) and GM1 M.A.401(b)(4) apply.

text: SUBPART E — COMPONENTS

text: GM1 ML.A.501 Classification and installation

text: Components accepted by the owner in accordance with 21.A.307(c) of Part 21, or standard parts are eligible for installation without an EASA Form 1. […]

text: GM1 ML.A.501(a) Classification and installation

text: Point (b) of 21.A.307 specifies new components that do not need an EASA Form 1 or equivalent to be eligible for installation. Point (c) of 21.A.307 specifies the conditions for the document accompanying the component. […]

text: AMC1 ML.A.501(a)(ii) Classification and installation

text: A document equivalent to an EASA Form 1 may be: […] (i) a ‘declaration of maintenance accomplished’ issued by the person or organisation that performed the maintenance, as specified in point ML.A.502(c).

text: GM1 ML.A.502(c) Component maintenance

text: A ‘declaration of maintenance accomplished’ is a certificate prepared in any shape/form by the person or organisation that performed any maintenance on the component covered by the certificate and subject Page 3 of 4

text: to conditions in ML.A.502(c). This person or organisation does not need an approval to perform maintenance in accordance with

text: Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014

text: . In order for the component to be eligible for installation with a ‘declaration of maintenance accomplished’, this declaration, together with other records, should allow the determination that the component was first installed as ‘new’, as a component referred to in ML.A.502(c). Such a component should not be installed in an aircraft if there is information on the certificate which is not readable or not understandable or states that the component is not in a satisfactory condition for operation.

type: vagledning

utgivare: easa


text: AMC and GM to Part-ML Issue 1 — Amendment 2

text: Note to the reader

text: In amended, and in particular in existing (that is, unchanged) text, ‘Agency’ is used interchangeably with ‘EASA’. The interchangeable use of these two terms is more apparent in the consolidated versions. Therefore, please note that both terms refer to the ‘European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)’.

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 1 of 15

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 3 of 15

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 4 of 15

text: (only applicable if a MIP different from the one described in AMC1 ML.A.302(d) is used — see Section 2 above)

text: (include only if necessary — see Section 4 above)

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 5 of 15

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 6 of 15

text: (include only if necessary — see Sections 5 above)

text: EASA Form AMP, Issue 12

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 7 of 15

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 8 of 15

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 9 of 15

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 10 of 15

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 11 of 15

text: Form 123 Issue 002

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 12 of 15

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 13 of 15

text: Annex II to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 14 of 15

text: Annex II to ED Decision 2023/013/R Page 15 of 15

identifier: AMC & GM to Part-ML — Issue 1, Amendment 2

beslut: ED Decision 2023/013/R

title: AMC & GM to Part-ML — Issue 1, Amendment 2

text: Annex V to ED Decision 2023/013/R

text: Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Annex Vb (Part-ML) to

text: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014

text: Issue 1 — Amendment 2 The text of the amendment is arranged to show deleted text, new or amended text as shown below: — deleted text is struck through; — new or amended text is highlighted in blue; — an ellipsis ‘[…]’ indicates that the rest of the text is unchanged.

text: SECTION A — TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

text: AMC1 ML.A.202 Occurrence reporting

text: Accountable persons or organisations should ensure that the design approval holder (DAH) or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance receives adequate reports of occurrences for that aircraft or component, to enable the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance to issue appropriate service instructions and recommendations to all owners or operators. Accountable persons or organisations should establish a liaison liaise with the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance to determine whether published or proposed service information will resolve the a problem or to obtain a solution to a particular problem. AMC-20 ‘General Acceptable Means of Compliance for Airworthiness of Products, Parts and Appliances’ provides further details on occurrence reporting (AMC 20-8).

text: GM1 ML.A.301(f) Continuing airworthiness tasks

text: MAINTENANCE CHECK FLIGHTS (MCFs)

text: […] (b) Depending on the aircraft defect and the status of the maintenance activity performed before the flight, different scenarios are possible and are described below: (1) The aircraft maintenance manual (AMM), or any other maintenance data issued by the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance, requires that an MCF be performed before completion of the maintenance ordered. In this scenario, a certificate after incomplete maintenance, when in compliance with ML.A.801(f) or 145.A.50(e), should be issued and the aircraft can be flown for this purpose under its airworthiness certificate. […]

text: AMC1 ML.A.302 Aircraft maintenance programme

text: (a) The aircraft should only be maintained according to a single one maintenance programme at a given point in time. Where an owner wishes to change from one programme to another (e.g. from an AMP based on minimum inspection programme (MIP) to an AMP based on the data issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance data), certain additional maintenance may need to be carried out on the aircraft to implement this transition. […]

text: AMC2 ML.A.302 Aircraft maintenance programme

text: EASA FORM AMP

text: The following EASA Form AMP may be used to produce the AMP:

text: Part-ML aircraft maintenance programme (AMP) Aircraft identification

text: 1 Registration(s): Type: Serial no(s):

text: Owner:

text: Basis for the maintenance programme

text: 2 Design approval holder (DAH) Iinstructions for Minimum inspection programme (MIP) as detailed continuinged airworthiness (ICA) in the latest revision of AMC1 ML.A.302(d) Other MIP complying with ML.A.302(d) (List the tasks in Appendix A)

text: Design approval holder (DAH) Iinstructions for continuing airworthiness (ICA)

text: 3 Equipment manufacturer and type Applicable ICA reference (revision/date not required assuming the latest revision will always be used)

text: For aircraft other than balloons

text: 3a Aircraft (other than balloons) 3b Engine (if applicable) 3c Propeller (if applicable)

text: For balloons

text: 3d Envelope (only for balloons) 3e Basket(s) (only for balloons)

text: 3f Burner(s) (only for balloons)

text: 3g Fuel cylinders (only for balloons)

text: Additional maintenance requirements to the DAH’ ICA or to the MIP (applicable to all AMPs)

text: 4 Indicate if whether any of the following types of repetitive maintenance are included in Yes No the AMP (when replying ‘YES’, list the specific requirements in Appendix B) Maintenance due to specific equipment and modifications Maintenance due to repairs Maintenance due to life-limited components (tThis should be completed only if the MIP is used. Otherwise, this data is already part of the data issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance data used as a basis for the AMP.) Maintenance due to mandatory continuing airworthiness information (airworthiness limitations (ALIs), certification maintenance requirements (CMRs), specific requirements in the TCDS, etc.) Maintenance recommendations, such as time between overhaul (TBO) intervals, issued through service bulletins, service letters, and other non-mandatory service information Maintenance due to repetitive ADs Maintenance due to specific operational/airspace directives/requirements (altimeter, compass, transponder, etc.) Maintenance due to the type of operation or operational approvals Other

text: 5 Indicate if whether there is any maintenance task alternative to the DAH’s ICA (when Yes No replying ‘YES’, list the specific alternative maintenance tasks in Appendix C)

text: Pilot-owner maintenance (only for balloons not operated under Subpart-ADD, or sailplanes not operated under Subpart-DEC, or other aircraft operated under Part-NCO) Remark: pilot-owner maintenance is not allowed for aircraft operated by a commercial ATO/DTO

text: 6 Does the pilot-owner perform pilot-owner maintenance (ref. ML.A.803)? Yes No

text: If yes, enter the name of the pilot-owner(s) authorised to perform such maintenance: Pilot-owner name:_(NOTE)__________________Licence number: (NOTE)__________________ Signature: _______________________________Date: _________________________________ NOTE: It is possible to refer to a list in the case of jointly owned aircraft.

text: Approval/declaration of the maintenance programme (select the appropriate option)

text: 7 Declaration by the owner: Approval by the contracted CAMO/CAO: ‘I hereby declare that this is the maintenance programme Approval reference no of the CAMO/CAO: applicable to the aircraft referred to in block 1, and I am fully responsible for its content and, in particular, for any Signature/name/date: alternatives tasks to the data issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance data.’ Signature/name/date:

text: Certification statement

text: 8 ‘I will ensure that the aircraft is maintained in accordance with this maintenance programme and that the maintenance programme will be reviewed and updated as required.’ Signed by the person/organisation responsible for the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft according to ML.A.201: Owner/Lessee/operator CAMO/CAO Name of owner/lessee/operator or CAMO/CAO approval number: Address: Telephone/fax: Email: Signature/date: 9 Appendices attached: Appendix A YES NO Appendix B YES NO Appendix C YES NO Appendix D YES NO

text: Appendix A — Minimum inspection programme (MIP)

text: Detail the tasks and inspections contained in the MIP being used.

text: Appendix B — Additional maintenance requirements

text: This appendix is supposed to include only the tasks which are included in the AMP, either at the recommended interval or at a different one. (All repetitive maintenance tasks not included here, or the interval differences, should be kept by the CAMO/CAO (when contracted) in their files with their corresponding justifications. Appendix D may optionally be used. Nevertheless, the owner/CAMO/CAO is responsible for taking into account all instructions, even if they are not adopted and listed here. The person performing the AR, if reviewing the AMP, is not responsible for the completeness of this appendix, but may do some sampling as part of the investigations and the findings discovered during the physical review).

text: Task description References Interval (tick box if the selected interval differs from that required in the referenced document)

text: Maintenance due to specific equipment and modifications

text: Maintenance due to repairs

text: Maintenance due to life-limited components (This should be only completed if the MIP is used. Otherwise, this data is already part of the DAH’s data used as the basis for the AMP.)

text: Maintenance due to mandatory continuing airworthiness instructions (ALIs, CMRs, specific requirements in the TCDS, etc.)

text: Maintenance recommendations, such as TBO intervals, issued through service bulletins, service letters, and other non-mandatory service information

text: Emergency locator transmitters and EASA SIB 2019-09 1 Year personal locator beacon — annual testing (if not using MIP or equivalent ICA task) EASA SIB 2011-15 2 Years Transponder test

text: Maintenance due to repetitive ADs

text: Other

text: Appendix C — Maintenance tasks alternative to the DAH’s ICA (not less restrictive than the MIP)

text: Task description Recommended interval Alternative inspection/task Amended interval When the DAH’s ICA are used as the basis for the AMP, this appendix is used to include the tasks alternative to the DAH’s ICA, which are included in the AMP. (When a CAMO/CAO is contracted, all elements justifying the deviations from the DAH’s ICA should be kept by the CAMO/CAO and the organisation should provide a copy of these justifications to the owner.)

text: Appendix D — Additional information (optional)

text: This appendix may optionally be used to provide additional information, such as the complete list of AMP tasks or the list of documents (e.g. service bulletins) considered during the development of the AMP.

text: GM1 ML.A.302 Aircraft maintenance programme

text: The responsibilities associated with maintenance programmes developed in accordance with ML.A.302 are the following: (a) If the owner has contracted a CAMO or CAO in order to manage the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft, this organisation is responsible for developing and approving a maintenance programme which: (1) indicates whether this programme is based on data from the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance, or based on the MIP described in ML.A.302(d); (2) identifies the owner and the specific aircraft, engine, and propeller (as applicable); (3) includes all mandatory continuing airworthiness information and any additional tasks derived from the assessment of the instructions issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance instructions; (4) justifies any deviations from the instructions issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance instructions; when the DAH’s those instructions are the basis for the AMP development, these deviations should not fall below the requirements of the MIP; and (5) is customised to the particular aircraft type, configuration and operation, in accordance with ML.A.302(c)(5). (b) If the owner has not contracted a CAMO or CAO in order to manage the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft, then the owner is responsible for developing and declaring the maintenance programme, assuming full responsibility for its content, and for any deviations from the instructions issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance instructions (ref. ML.A.201(f) and ML.A.302(c)(7)) and the possible consequences of such deviations. In this case, these deviations do not need to be justified, but are to be identified in the AMP. However, the maintenance programme still needs to comply with the requirements contained in ML.A.302(c), in particular with the obligation to not fall below the requirements of the MIP and to comply with the mandatory continuing airworthiness information. […] (f) Since the maintenance programme has to identify the alternatives tasks to the instructions issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance instructions, the ARs and ACAM inspections can place emphasis on the inspection of the areas affected by those deviations in order to make sure that the maintenance programme is effective. […]

text: GM2 ML.A.302 Aircraft maintenance programme

text: The following table provides a summary of the provisions contained in ML.A.302 in relation to the content of the maintenance programme, its approval, and its link with the AR:

text: OPTION 1 OPTION 2

text: Responsibility for Contracted CAMO or CAO Owner (if allowed under developing the AMP ML.A.201(f)) Approval/declaration of Approved by the CAMO or CAO, or none Declaration by the owner or none the maintenance required in the case of compliance with required in the case of compliance programme ML.A.302(e) with ML.A.302(e) Basis for the maintenance MIP (not applicable to rotorcraft and airships), or ICA issued by the DAH or programme declarant of a declaration of design compliance Deviations from the Deviations from the DAH’s instructions ICA Deviations do not need to be DAH’s ICA are justified. The CAMO/CAO keeps a justified. record of the justifications and provides a copy of them to the owner. AMP annual review In conjunction with the AR, by the AR staff or, if not performed in conjunction with the AR (e.g. in case of ARC extension), by the CAMO or CAO.

text: AMC1 ML.A.302(c) Aircraft maintenance programme

text: When evaluating an alternative to a maintenance task issued or recommended by the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance, such as the extension of TBO intervals, or when considering not to include a maintenance task issued or recommended by the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance, a risk-based approach should be taken, considering aspects such as the operation of aircraft, type of aircraft, hours and years in service, maintenance of the aircraft, compensating measures, redundancy of components, etc. […] The above information may be useful for CAMOs and CAOs when developing and approving maintenance programmes, and for the AR staff performing ARs and reviewing the effectiveness of the declared maintenance programme. It may also be useful for the owner in order to take an informed decision before introducing deviations from the recommendations issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance recommendations. Nevertheless, as allowed by ML.A.302(c)(7) and explained in GM ML.A.302, when the owner issues a declaration for the maintenance programme, they do it does not need to justify such deviations.

text: AMC1 ML.A.302(c)(9) Aircraft maintenance programme

text: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE AMP

text: (a) During the annual review of the maintenance programme, as required by point ML.A.302(c)(9), the following should be taken into consideration: (1) the results of the maintenance performed during that year, which may reveal that the current maintenance programme is not adequate; (2) the results of the AR performed on the aircraft, which may reveal that the current maintenance programme is not adequate; (3) revisions introduced on the documents affecting the programme basis, such as the ML.A.302(d) MIP or the data issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance data; (4) changes in the aircraft configuration, and type and specificity of operation; (5) changes in the list of pilot-owners; and (6) applicable mandatory requirements for compliance with Part 21 or Part 21 Light, such as airworthiness directives (ADs), airworthiness limitations, certification maintenance requirements and specific maintenance requirements contained in the type certificate data sheet (TCDS) or airworthiness data sheet (for aircraft subject to a declaration of design compliance). (b) When reviewing the effectiveness of the AMP, the AR staff (or the CAMO/CAO staff if the review of the AMP is not performed in conjunction with an AR) may need to review the maintenance carried out during the last 12 months, including unscheduled maintenance. To this end, he or she should receive the records of all the maintenance performed during that year from the owner/CAMO/CAO. (c) When reviewing the results of the maintenance performed during that year and the results of the AR, attention should be paid as to whether the defects found could have been prevented by introducing in the maintenance programme certain recommendations issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance recommendations, which were initially disregarded by the owner, CAMO or CAO.

text: GM1 ML.A.302(c)(2)(b) Aircraft maintenance programme

text: ‘DAH’ refers to the holder of a type certificate (TC), restricted type certificate, supplemental type certificate (STC), European Technical Standard Order (ETSO) authorisation, repair or change to the type design. ‘Declarant’ refers to the natural of legal person who has submitted a declaration of design compliance in accordance with Part 21 Light. The ‘instructions for continuing airworthiness (‘ICA’) issued by the design approval holder (‘DAH’)’ or the declarant do not include the data issued by another original equipment manufacturer (OEM), except when the ICA issued by the DAH’s or the declarant makes clear reference to such OEM data. Tasks or intervals (e.g. escalations) alternative to those of the ICA issued by the DAH’s or the declarant ICA and selected by the CAMO or CAO for the AMP do not need to be approved by the competent authority. Justification of these deviations are to be kept by the CAMO or CAO.

text: GM1 ML.A.302(c)(3) Aircraft maintenance programme

text: ALTERNATIVE MAINTENANCE ACTIONS

text: ‘Maintenance actions alternative to those referred to in point (c)(2)(b)’ refer to when the ICA issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance ICA are used as the basis for the AMP development and the CAMO, CAO or owner (as applicable), when developing the AMP, decides to deviate from certain of these instructions issued by the DAH’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance instructions, introducing, for example, a less frequent interval than or a different task type (inspection instead of check) than from the one established by the ICA. […]

text: GM1 ML.A.302(c)(4) Aircraft maintenance programme

text: MANDATORY CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS INFORMATION OTHER THAN ADS

text: ‘Mandatory continuing airworthiness information’ other than ADs may be different from one aircraft to another, depending on the type certification basis used. The aircraft may have been certified before the term ‘ALS (Airworthiness Limitations Section)’ was introduced in the certification specification (or airworthiness code). However, the intent is that the AMP (whether based on MIP or not) includes all mandatory scheduled maintenance requirements identified during the initial airworthiness activity, by the TC holder, STC holder, declarant of a declaration of design compliance and, if applicable, engine TC holder. […] In case of doubt, it is advised to check the TCDS or airworthiness data sheet or contact the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance. […]

text: Point (b) of 21.A.307(b) of Annex I (Part 21) and point 21L.A.193(b) of Annex Ib (Part 21 Light) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 748/2012

text: specifyies new components that do not need an EASA Form 1 or equivalent to be eligible for installation. Point (c) of 21.A.307(c) of Annex I (Part 21) and point 21L.A.193(c) of Annex Ib (Part 21 Light) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 748/2012

text: specifyies the conditions for the document accompanying the component.

text: AMC1 ML.A.801 Aircraft certificate of release to service

text: AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATE OF RELEASE TO SERVICE (CRS) AFTER EMBODIMENT OF A STANDARD CHANGE OR A STANDARD REPAIR (SC/SR)

text: 1. Release to service and eligible persons […] Since the design of the SC/SR does not require specific approval, the natural or legal person releasing the embodiment of the change or repair takes the responsibility that the applicable certification specifications within CS-STAN are fulfilled while being in compliance with Part-ML/ Part-M Subpart F/Part-CAO and/or Part-145 and not in conflict with the data issued by the TC holder’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance data. This includes responsibility in respect of an adequate design, the selection/manufacturing of suitable parts and their identification, documenting the change or repair, generation or amendment of aircraft manuals and instructions as needed, embodiment of the change/repair, releasing the aircraft to service and record-keeping. […] 2. Parts and appliances to be installed as part of a SC/SR […] Eligibility for installation of parts and appliances belonging to a SC/SR is subject to compliance with the Part 21, Part 21 Light and Part-ML and maintenance-organisation-related provisions, and the situation varies depending on the aircraft in/on which the SC/SR is to be embodied, and who the installer is. The need for an EASA Form 1 is addressed in Part 21, Part 21 Light and Part-ML, while less restrictive rules may, for instance, apply for ELA1 and ELA2 aircraft parts (e.g. 21.A.307) and sailplane parts (e.g. AMC 21.A.303 of the ‘AMC and GM to Part 21’) or point 21L.A.193 of Part 21 Light. Furthermore, Part-M Subpart F, Part-CAO and Part-145 contain provisions (i.e. M.A.603(c), CAO.A.020(c) and 145.A.42(c)) that allow maintenance organisations to fabricate certain parts to be installed in/on the aircraft as part of their maintenance activities. 3. Parts’ and appliances’ iIdentification of parts and appliances The parts modified or installed during the embodiment of the SC/SR need to be permanently marked in accordance with Part 21 Subpart Q or Part 21 Light Subpart Q. […] EASA Form 123 — Standard Change/Standard Repair (SC/SR) embodiment record

text: 1. SC/SR number(s): 2. SC/SR title & description: 3. Applicability:

text: 4. List of parts (description/Part-No/Qty):

text: 5. Operational limitations/affected aircraft manuals. Copies of these manuals are provided to the aircraft owner:

text: 6. Documents used for the development and embodiment of this SC/SR:

text: * Copies of the documents marked with an asterisk are handed provided to the aircraft owner.

text: 7. Instructions for continuing airworthiness. Copies of these manuals are provided to the aircraft owner:

text: 8. Other information:

text: 9a. This SC complies with the criteria established in 21.A.90B(a) of Part 21, or in 21L.A.62 or 21L.A.102 of Part 21 Light, and with the relevant paragraphs of CS-STAN. 9b. This SR complies with the criteria established in 21.A.431B(a) of Part 21, or in 21L.A.202 or 21L.A.222 of Part 21 Light, and with the relevant paragraphs of CS-STAN. 10. Date of SC/SR embodiment: 11. Identification data and signature of the person responsible for the embodiment of the SC/SR:

text: 12. Signature of the aircraft owner. This signature attests that all relevant documentation is has been handed over from the issuer of this form to the aircraft owner, and, therefore, the latter has becomes aware of any impact or limitations on operations or additional continuing airworthiness requirements which may apply to the aircraft due to the embodiment of the change/repair.

text: AMC1 ML.A.801(e) Aircraft certificate of release to service

text: […] (b) The CRS should relate to the task specified in the instruction issued by the DAH’s, the declarant of a declaration of design compliance or the operator,’s instruction or in the AMP which itself may cross-refer to a an instruction issued by the DAH’s/declarant of a declaration of design compliance/operator’s instruction in a maintenance manual, service bulletin, etc. This should indicate the revision status of the maintenance instruction used. […]

text: AMC1 ML.A.801(f) Aircraft certificate of release to service

text: Certain maintenance data issued by the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance (e.g. AMM) requires that a maintenance task be performed in flight as a necessary condition to complete the maintenance ordered. Within the aircraft limitations, the person authorised to certify the maintenance per ML.A.801 should release the incomplete maintenance before this flight. […]

text: SECTION B — PROCEDURE FOR COMPETENT AUTHORITIES

text: AMC1 ML.B.201 Responsibilities

text: Template that can be used by the owner, CAO or CAMO upon request by the competent authority to collect information about the AMP

text: Part-ML aircraft maintenance programme (AMP)

text: Aircraft identification

text: 1 Registration(s): Type: Serial no(s): Owner:

text: Which basis is used for the maintenance programme?

text: 2 Design approval holder (DAH) ICA Minimum inspection programme (MIP) as detailed in the latest revision of AMC ML.A.302(d) Tasks alternative to ICA introduced in AMP? Other MIP complying with ML.A.302(d) Yes No Additional maintenance requirements to ICA or MIP: deviations introduced? Yes No Not applicable

text: 3 AMP declared by the owner Default AMP (ML.A.302(e)) Approved by the contracted CAMO/CAO. Approval reference of the organisation: ________________

text: AMC TO APPENDICES TO ANNEX VB (PART-ML)

text: AMC1 to Appendix II to Part-ML — Limited pilot-owner maintenance

text: […] (e) Inspection tasks/checks of any periodicity included in an approved maintenance programme can be carried out provided that the specified tasks are compliant with the basic principles of Appendix II to Part-ML. The content of periodic inspections/checks, as well as their periodicity, is not regulated or standardised in an aviation specification. It is the decision of the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance to recommend a schedule for each specific type of inspection/check. […]

text: Part D — PILOT-OWNER MAINTENANCE TASKS FOR BALLOONS/AIRSHIPS

text: Hot-air Hot-air Gas Area and task airship balloon balloon (A) ENVELOPE

text: (1) Fabric repairs — excluding complete panels (as defined in, and in Yes Yes NO accordance with, the instructions issued by the TC holder’s or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance instructions) not requiring load tape repair or replacement […] Yes n/a n/a


text: N o t e t o t h e r e a d e r

text: In amended, and in particular in existing (that is, unchanged) text, ‘Agency’ is used interchangeably with ‘EASA’. The interchangeable use of these two terms is more apparent in the consolidated versions. Therefore, please note that both terms refer to the ‘European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)’.

text: Annex VI to ED Decision 2026/002/R Page 1 of 3

text: AMC and GM to Part-ML Issue 1, Amendment 3

text: OPTION 1 OPTION 2

text: Responsibility for Contracted CAMO or CAO Owner (if allowed under developing the AMP ML.A.201(f)) Approval/declaration of Approved by the CAMO or CAO, or none Declaration by the owner or none the maintenance required in case of compliance with required in case of compliance programme ML.A.302(e) with ML.A.302(e) Basis for the maintenance MIP (not applicable to rotorcraft and airshipsonly applicable to aeroplanes, programme sailplanes and balloons) or ICA issued by the DAH Deviations from the Deviations from the DAH’s instructions are Deviations do not need to be DAH’s ICA justified. The CAMO/CAO keeps a record of justified. the justifications and provides a copy of them to the owner. AMP annual review In conjunction with the AR, by the AR staff or, if not performed in conjunction with the AR (e.g. in case of ARC extension), by the CAMO or CAO.

text: POWER PLANT (OTHER THAN TURBOPROP ENGINE) PISTON ENGINE

text: Annex VI to ED Decision 2026/002/R Page 2 of 3

text: Annex VI to ED Decision 2026/002/R Page 3 of 3

identifier: AMC & GM to Part-ML — Issue 1, Amendment 3

beslut: ED Decision 2026/002/R

text: Annex VI to ED Decision 2026/002/R AMC and GM to Part-ML — Issue 1, Amendment 3

text: The amendments are presented as follows:

text: — deleted text is struck through;

text: — new text is highlighted;

text: — an ellipsis ‘[…]’ indicates that the rest of the text is unchanged.

text: GM2 ML.A.302 Aircraft maintenance programme

text: The following table provides a summary of the provisions contained in point ML.A.302 in relation to the content of the maintenance programme, its approval and its link with the airworthiness review (AR):

text: AMC1 ML.A.302(d) Aircraft maintenance programme

text: This AMC contains an acceptable MIP for aeroplanes of 2 730 kg maximum take-off mass (MTOM) and below, and for ELA2 aircraft other than rotorcraft or airships, grouped in the following categories:

text: — aeroplanes of 2 730 kg MTOM and below;

text: — ELA2 sailplanes and ELA2 powered sailplanes; and

text: — ELA2 balloons.

text: MIP for aeroplanes of 2 730 kg MTOM and below

text: Note: In respect of the power plant, the MIP list of tasks below covers only ‘PISTON ENGINES’ or ‘TURBOPROP ENGINES’. For other types of power plants, consider the tasks as established in the aircraft ICAs related to the power plant.

text: (a) The lists below specifyies items that may be expected to be completed on the referred aircraft by an owner who holds a current and valid pilot licence for the aircraft type involved and who meets the competence and responsibility requirements of Appendix II to Part-ML. […] (d) Therefore, the followingThe lists are considered to be withinmeet the representative scope of limited pilot-owner maintenance referred to in point ML.A.803 and in Appendix II to Part-ML for the aircraft referred to in the corresponding Parts A to D: (1) Part A applies to piston-engine aeroplanes; (2) Part B applies to piston-engine rotorcraft; (3) Part C applies to sailplanes and powered (piston-engine) sailplanes; and (4) Part D applies to balloons and airships. Note: For aircraft referred to in Parts A to C that have a power plant other than a piston engine, the lists of tasks below are also suitable, as applicable, for pilot-owner maintenance. […]


identifier: AMC & GM to Part-ML — Issue 1, Amendment 4

beslut: ED Decision 2026/005/R

text: AMC and GM to Part-ML Issue 1, Amendment 4

text: Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Annex Vb (Part-ML) to

text: Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014

text: , Issue 1, Amendment 4

text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2026/005/R ‘AMC and GM to Part-ML — Issue 1, Amendment 4’

text: The amendments are presented as follows: — deleted text is struck through; — new text is highlighted; — an ellipsis ‘[…]’ indicates that the rest of the text is unchanged. Not e to re ad e r s ‘Agency’ and ‘EASA’ are used interchangeably, and this is most visible in consolidated texts. In all cases, both terms refer to the European Union Aviation Safety Agency.

text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2026/005/R Page 1 of 3

text: Annex VI to Decision 2020/002/R of the Executive Director of the Agency of 13 March 2020 is amended as follows:

text: AMC1 ML.A.202 Occurrence reporting

text: Accountable persons or organisations should ensure that the design approval holder (DAH) or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance receives adequate reports of occurrences for that aircraft or component, to enable the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance to issue appropriate service instructions and recommendations to all owners or operators. Accountable persons or organisations should liaise with the DAH or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance to determine whether published or proposed service information will resolve a problem or to obtain a solution to a particular problem. AMC-20 ‘General Acceptable Means of Compliance for Airworthiness of Products, Parts and Appliances’ provides further details on occurrence reporting (AMC 20-8).

text: GM1 ML.A.202 Occurrence reporting

text: MANDATORY REPORTING — GENERAL (a) If the persons identified in point ML.A.202(a) are employed by, contracted by or whose services are used by an organisation established in a Member State,

text: Article 4(6) of Regulation (EU) No 376/2014

text: requires that occurrences be reported to that organisation. This may be the case, for example, in cases in which independent certifying staff provide services to a CAMO established in the EU that has requested them to perform maintenance. In such cases, the provisions of

text: Regulation (EU) No 376/2014

text: are to be complied with and the occurrence is to be reported through the organisation concerned. However, situations may arise in which the individuals referred to in point ML.A.202(a) work for an organisation established outside the EU or act exclusively on their own behalf, outside the framework of an organisation. This may occur, for example, in cases in which the owner manages the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft and also performs maintenance under the pilot-owner privilege. In such cases, the reporting provisions set out in point ML.A.202 are to be followed. (b) Implementing

text: Regulation (EU) 2015/1018

text: lays down a list classifying occurrences in civil aviation to be mandatorily reported. This list should not be understood as being an exhaustive collection of all the issues that may pose a significant risk to civil aviation safety and, therefore, reporting should not be limited to the items listed in that Regulation. (c) Reporters are encouraged to include as much relevant information as possible in their reports. Annex I to

text: Regulation (EU) No 376/2014

text: may be used as a reference for the types of information mandatory for each specific type of occurrence. Furthermore, reporters should include any factors that may be relevant to the occurrence, including contributing human factors. Providing these details supports a better understanding of the safety hazards and enables a more accurate identification of the safety risks. (d) AMC-20 ‘General Acceptable Means of Compliance for Airworthiness of Products, Parts and Appliances’, and in particular AMC 20-8A, provides further details on occurrence reporting.

text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2026/005/R Page 2 of 3

text: GM1 ML.A.901 Aircraft airworthiness review

text: If a CAMO/CAO holding the AR privilege is contracted by the owner to manage the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft in accordance with point ML.A.201, this organisation does not have the obligation to carry out the AR itself. The owner may select another CAMO or CAO to carry out the AR, or request the maintenance organisation to carry it out and issue the ARC in conjunction with the annual inspection. Please refer to GM1 ML.A.201 to identify the cases where the owner may also request an independent certifying staff (authorised by the competent authority) to carry out the AR and issue the ARC in conjunction with the annual inspection. Point ML.A.901(bc) gives a list of the different organisations or persons that are allowed to perform an AR; it does not presume that they have the obligation to accept a request to carry out an AR.

text: AMC1 ML.A.903(hi) Airworthiness review

text: REVIEW OF AMP IN CONJUNCTION WITH AR This review of the AMP maintenance programme is performed by the person who performed the AR, who could belong to the competent authority, a CAMO, a CAO or a maintenance organisation or could also be independent certifying staff in accordance with point ML.A.901(bc)(4)M.A.901(g). This person is not responsible for the completeness of this AMP, but may do some sampling as part of the investigations and the findings discovered during the physical review. More details on the annual review are provided in AMC1 ML.A.302(c)(9).

text: Annex IV to ED Decision 2026/005/R Page 3 of 3