text: ENISA Threat Landscape 2022 https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2022

text: While we refer to the maritime sector throughout the report, we have also considered inland waterway transport in the analysis. 3 https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/nis-directive 4 In the road sector, original equipment manufacturers (OEM), tier-X suppliers and the whole automotive sector were considered in the analysis. 5 ENISA Cybersecurity Threat Landscape Methodology, July 2022. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-methodology 6 This is a result of work by ENISA in the area of situational awareness in accordance with the EU Cybersecurity Act

text: Article 7

text: , Paragraph 6 https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R0881&from=EN European Centre for Cybersecurity in Aviation (ECCSA) https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/eccsa 8 European Air Traffic Management Computer Emergency Response Team (EATM-CERT) https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/european-air-trafficmanagement-computer-emergency-response-team 9 Malware Information Sharing Platform estimative language https://www.misp-project.org/taxonomies.html#_estimative_language

text: Incidents targeting the transport sector accounted for 4.8% and 4.3% of the total incidents identified in ENISA threat landscapes 2021 and 2022, respectively. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2021; https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape- 2022

text: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/603175/EPRS_STU(2017)603175_EN.pdf 8

text: ENISA Threat Landscape for Ransomware Attacks https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-for-ransomware-attacks

text: For more information regarding the common vulnerabilities and exposures (CVE) that were discovered and used from July 2021 to June 2022, see ENISA Threat Landscape 2022 (annex C). https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2022

text: 15 Similarly to the ENISA Threat Landscape 2021 and ENISA Threat Landscape 2022 , we considered four categories of cybersecurity threat actors: state-sponsored actors, cybercriminals, hackers-for-hire, and hacktivists.

text: ENISA Threat Landscape 2021 https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2021 ENISA Threat Landscape 2022 https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2022 16 The term has been used interchangeably with Advanced Persistent Threat (APT), however APT refers to a type of activity conducted by a range of actors.

text: In the EU, critical service providers have to report cybersecurity incidents that have a significant impact to the national authorities in their country. At the end of each year, the summary reports about these incidents are collected, anonymised, aggregated and analysed by ENISA. The visualisation tool shows the overall statistics for the EU. https://ciras.enisa.europa.eu/

text: https://www.databreaches.net/malware-attack-on-radixx-res-disrupts-20-airlines-ticket-reservation-systems/ 19 https://therecord.media/bangkok-air-confirms-passenger-pii-leak-after-ransomware-attack/

text: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/dassault-falcon-jet-reports-data-breach-after-ransomware-attack/ 21 https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/128039/cyber-crime/blackcat-swissport-ransomware-attack.html 22 https://therecord.media/spiceject-ransomware-attack-flights-grounded/ 23 https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/turkish-airline-exposes-flight/ 24 https://therecord.media/major-airline-technology-provider-accelya-attacked-by-ransomware-group/ 25 https://www.portugalresident.com/hackers-share-personal-data-of-1-5-million-tap-passengers/

text: https://cyware.com/news/lockbit-30-gang-allegedly-stole-thales-groups-data-aa676192/ 27 https://www.redpacketsecurity.com/black-basta-ransomware-victim-genesys-aerosystems/ 28 The incidents which served as a basis for the analyses (January 2021 to June 2022) were: (a) publicly reported incidents/events which EATM-CERT collected, (b) findings of EATM-CERT (c) non-publicly reported cyber incidents or events, shared with EATM-CERT by aviation stakeholders (air navigation service providers, airport operators, original equipment manufacturers, civil aviation authorities, airspace users) and the Aviation Information Sharing and Analysis Centre. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/airport-websites-hit-by-denial-of-service-attack/ 30 https://www.wired.it/article/attacco-cyber-russia-italia-legion-ministero-polizia/ 31 https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1728365/major-incidents-contained-after-lithuania-gets-hit-with-massive-cyber-attacks 32 https://www.cyberthreat.report/ddos-attack-against-slovakia-by-russian-hackers/ 33 https://sofiaglobe.com/2022/10/16/official-cyber-attack-on-bulgarian-government-websites-traced-to-russia/ 34 https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-airports-sites-taken-down-in-ddos-attacks-by-pro-russian-hackers/

text: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/port-cybersecurity-good-practices-for-cybersecurity-in-the-maritime-sector/@@download/fullReport 36 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24539417 37 https://www.wired.com/story/notpetya-cyberattack-ukraine-russia-code-crashed-the-world/ 38 https://www.securitynewspaper.com/2018/09/26/hacking-attack-in-port-of-barcelona/ 39 https://www.darktrace.com/en/blog/troubled-waters-cyber-attacks-on-san-diego-and-barcelonas-ports/ 40 https://www.recordedfuture.com/redecho-targeting-indian-power-sector 41 https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2021/10/11/iran-linked-dev-0343-targeting-defense-gis-and-maritime-sectors/ 42 https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/officials-israel-linked-to-a-disruptive-cyberattack-on-iranian-port-facility/2020/05/18/9d1da866- 9942-11ea-89fd-28fb313d1886_story.html

text: https://safety4sea.com/cyber-attack-targets-port-of-london-authority/ 44 https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/24/russia_ais_spoofing/ 45 https://www.securityweek.com/boat-building-giant-beneteau-says-cyberattack-disrupted-production

text: https://www.radiolac.ch/actualite/la-cgn-victime-dune-cyberattaque-sur-son-site-internet/ 47 https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/LL1138249/CMA-CGM-confirms-data-leak-after-cyber-attack 48 https://icsstrive.com/incident/ransomware-attack-at-maritime-it-company-danaos-propagated-to-greek-shipping-companies/ 49 https://theloadstar.com/truck-queues-lengthen-as-nhava-sheva-tries-to-restore-it-after-cyber-attack/ 50 https://maritime.direct/en/2021/07/23/port-operations-disrupted-by-cyber-attack; https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/exclusive-south-africastransnet-hit-by-cyber-attack-sources-2021-07-22/; https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/south-africa-cyber-attack-cripples-operations-port-durban-secondtime-month; https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/exclusive-south-africas-transnet-hit-by-cyber-attack-sources-2021-07-22/ 51 https://www.stormshield.com/news/cybermaretique-a-short-history-of-cyberattacks-against-ports/; https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60250956 https://www.techzine.eu/news/security/72268/belgian-port-giant-sea-invest-hit-by-hacking-attack/; https://www.reuters.com/article/belgium-cyberidUSL1N2UE0PS

text: https://www.omroepflevoland.nl/nieuws/254573/autobedrijf-bochane-gehackt 53 https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/toyota-suspends-all-domestic-factory-operations-after-suspected-cyber-attack-2022-02-28/ 54 https://aithority.com/security/doppelpaymer-ransomware-attack-sinks-a-global-motor-companys-20-million/ 55 https://www.securityweek.com/car-parts-giant-denso-targeted-ransomware-group

text: https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/car-rental-giant-sixt-hit-by/ 57 https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/hauts-de-france/oise/beauvais/piratage-informatique-le-site-d-assemblage-de-tracteurs-massey-fergussonagco-beauvais-victime-d-une-cyber-attaque-2537316.html 58 https://www.securityweek.com/us-subsidiary-automotive-hose-maker-nichirin-hit-ransomware

text: https://www.riskbasedsecurity.com/2021/02/01/personal-data-of-3-million-people-exposed-in-drivesure-hack/ 60 https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/skane/skanetrafikens-sajt-och-app-ur-funktion 61 https://straeto.is/en/user-information/cyber-attack-against-straeto 62 https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tech/news/elon-musks-top-secret-full-24929177 63https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/en-gb/media/pressreleases/292817/notice-of-cyber-security-breach-by-third-party-1

text: https://threatpost.com/attackers-impersonate-dot-phishing-scam/169484/?web_view=true 65 https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/microsoft-365-phishing-attacks-impersonate-us-govt-agencies/; https://cofense.com/blog/credential-phishing-targeting-government-contractors-evolves-over-time

text: ENISA Threat Landscape 2022. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2022 67 https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/belarus-activists-fire-ransomware/; https://www.wired.com/story/belarus-railways-ransomware-hack-cyber-partisans/; https://www.railway-technology.com/news/belarusian-railway-cyber-breach/ 68 https://www.romania-insider.com/romania-state-websites-cyberattack-2022 69 https://english.radio.cz/cyber-agency-says-attack-czech-states-road-and-motorway-directorate-encoded-data-8751033 70 https://www.wired.it/article/attacco-cyber-russia-italia-legion-ministero-polizia/ 71 https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1728365/major-incidents-contained-after-lithuania-gets-hit-with-massive-cyber-attacks 72 https://www.apollo.lv/7535816/ddos-uzbrukumu-del-trauceta-pasazieru-vilciena-bilesu-tirdznieciba-uznemuma-majaslapa 73 https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1728365/major-incidents-contained-after-lithuania-gets-hit-with-massive-cyber-attacks

text: https://www.ohtuleht.ee/1068880/kuberrunnakus-sai-pihta-ka-eesti-raudtee 75 https://www.aviacionline.com/2022/03/cyber-attack-on-russias-aviation-authority-this-is-what-we-know/ 76 https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/130409/hacktivism/anonymous-hacked-other-russian-organizations.html 77 https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/135280/hacktivism/anonyomus-hacked-yandex-taxi.html 78 https://www.ibtimes.com/russians-novosibirsk-forced-pound-pavements-team-onefist-paralyzes-traffic-exclusive-3611628 79 ENISA Threat Landscape 2022 https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2022 80 Minimum Security Measures for Operators of Essentials Services https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/nis-directive/minimum-security-measures-foroperators-of-essentials-services

text: https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/113216/data-breach/dassault-falcon-data-breach.html https://www.zdnet.com/article/a-chinese-hacking-group-is-stealing-airline-passenger-details/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/05/airline-data-hack-hundreds-of-thousands-of-star-alliance-passengers-details-stolen https://www.databreaches.net/malware-attack-on-radixx-res-disrupts-20-airlines-ticket-reservation-systems/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/cyberattacks-against-the-aviation-industry-that-flew-under-the-radar-linked-to-nigerian-threat-actor/ https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/118162/data-breach/air-india-data-breach.html https://cyprus-mail.com/2021/05/30/state-bracing-for-more-cyberattacks/ https://www.soy502.com/articulo/toque-queda-rehabilitan-pagina-salvoconductos-viaje-32419 https://therecord.media/bangkok-air-confirms-passenger-pii-leak-after-ransomware-attack/ https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/128039/cyber-crime/blackcat-swissport-ransomware-attack.htm https://www.lemauricien.com/le-mauricien/de-lundi-a-mardi-le-reseau-informatique-de-mk-victime-dune-cyberattaque/474407/ https://niebezpiecznik.pl/post/atak-na-lotnicze-pogotwie-ratunkowe/ https://www.aviacionline.com/2022/03/cyber-attack-on-russias-aviation-authority-this-is-what-we-know/ https://cyware.com/news/canadian-low-cost-airline-sunwing-suffers-flight-delays-due-to-third-party-breach-516d93ae/ https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/airport-websites-hit-by-denial-of-service-attack/

text: https://therecord.media/spiceject-ransomware-attack-flights-grounded/ https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/turkish-airline-exposes-flight/ https://www.wired.it/article/attacco-cyber-russia-italia-legion-ministero-polizia/ https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1728365/major-incidents-contained-after-lithuania-gets-hit-with-massive-cyber-attacks Unprecedented cyber attack hit State Infrastructure of MontenegroSecurity Affairs https://therecord.media/major-airline-technology-provider-accelya-attacked-by-ransomware-group/ https://www.portugalresident.com/hackers-share-personal-data-of-1-5-million-tap-passengers https://www.securityweek.com/breached-american-airlines-email-accounts-abused-phishing https://cyware.com/news/lockbit-30-gang-allegedly-stole-thales-groups-data-aa676192/ https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-airports-sites-taken-down-in-ddos-attacks-by-pro-russian-hackers/ https://www.securityweek.com/boat-building-giant-beneteau-says-cyberattack-disrupted-production https://thehackernews.com/2021/03/chinese-hackers-targeted-indias-power.html https://splash247.com/bourbon-confirms-cyber-attack/ https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2021/06/02/ma-steamship-authority-targeted-in-cyberattack.html https://www.tradewindsnews.com/containerships/hmm-confirms-cyber-attack-on-email-servers-with-system-still-largely-down/2-1-1025365 https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/24/russia_ais_spoofing/

text: https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/exclusive-south-africas-transnet-hit-by-cyber-attack-sources-2021-07-22 https://www.porttechnology.org/news/port-houston-targeted-by-nation-state-actor-in-cyber-attack/ https://www.radiolac.ch/actualite/la-cgn-victime-dune-cyberattaque-sur-son-site-internet/ https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/LL1138249/CMA-CGM-confirms-data-leak-after-cyber-attack https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2021/10/11/iran-linked-dev-0343-targeting-defense-gis-and-maritime-sectors/ https://icsstrive.com/incident/ransomware-attack-at-maritime-it-company-danaos-propagated-to-greek-shipping-companies/ https://www.databreaches.net/swire-pacific-offshore-reports-cyberattack/ https://www.stormshield.com/news/cybermaretique-a-short-history-of-cyberattacks-against-ports/ https://theloadstar.com/ransomware-attack-hits-nhava-sheva-container-terminal/ https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-said-behind-cyberattack-that-caused-total-disarray-at-iran-port-report/ https://safety4sea.com/cyber-attack-targets-port-of-london-authority/ https://www.redpacketsecurity.com/lockbit-3-0-ransomware-victim-dragages-ports-fr/

text: https://www.databreaches.net/ransomware-attack-hits-short-line-rail-operator-omnitrax https://www.denik.cz/z_domova/zeleznice-hackeri-utok-vlak-20210322.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/02/nyregion/mta-cyber-attack.html https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/uk-rail-network-merseyrail-likely-hit-by-lockbit-ransomware/ https://www.reuters.com/world/Middle-east/hackers-breach-iran-rail-network-disrupt-service-2021-07-09/ https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-57892711 https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/skane/skanetrafikens-sajt-och-app-ur-funktion https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/french-transport-giant-exposes/ https://www.20minutes.fr/monde/3164079-20211103-canada-apres-montreal-vancouver-metro-toronto-aussi-pirate https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/go-transit-website-taken-offline-due-to-worldwide-cyber-threat-1.5703584 https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/hacker-flags-flaw-in-swiss-railway/ https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/belarus-activists-fire-ransomware/ https://www.napolitoday.it/attualita/eav-attacco-informatico.html https://www.reuters.com/world/us/italys-state-railway-may-have-been-target-cyber-attack-2022-03-23/?rpc=401& https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/130409/hacktivism/anonymous-hacked-other-russian-organizations.html https://www.romania-insider.com/romania-state-websites-cyberattack-2022 https://www.apollo.lv/7535816/ddos-uzbrukumu-del-trauceta-pasazieru-vilciena-bilesu-tirdznieciba-uznemuma-majaslapa https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1728365/major-incidents-contained-after-lithuania-gets-hit-with-massive-cyber-attacks https://www.version2.dk/artikel/lokaltog-taler-ud-om-ransomwareangreb-blev-ogsaa-ramt-sidste-aar https://www.ohtuleht.ee/1068880/kuberrunnakus-sai-pihta-ka-eesti-raudtee https://www.reuters.com/technology/danish-train-standstill-saturday-caused-by-cyber-attack-2022-11-03/

text: https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/toyota-malta-warns-of-whatsapp-scam-using-its-brand-name.866376 https://eu.capecodtimes.com/story/news/2022/06/04/cape-cod-regional-transit-authority-ransomware-cyber-attack-fbi-investigating/7501982001/ https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/after-power-chinese-hackers-target-transport-sector/article34125502.ece https://research.checkpoint.com/2021/indra-hackers-behind-recent-attacks-on-iran/ https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/skane/skanetrafikens-sajt-och-app-ur-funktion https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tech/news/elon-musks-top-secret-full-24929177 https://www.omroepflevoland.nl/nieuws/254573/autobedrijf-bochane-gehackt https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/french-transport-giant-exposes/ https://cybernews.com/news/threat-actors-leak-mercedes-benzs-platform-source-code/ https://autosec.se/volvo-cars-corporation-disclose/ https://straeto.is/en/user-information/cyber-attack-against-straeto https://aithority.com/security/doppelpaymer-ransomware-attack-sinks-a-global-motor-companys-20-million/ https://www.techzine.eu/news/security/78131/car-rental-giant-sixt-shut-down-following-cyberattack/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/transport-for-nsw-struck-by-cyber-attack/ https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/hauts-de-france/oise/beauvais/piratage-informatique-le-site-d-assemblage-de-tracteurs-massey-fergussonagco-beauvais-victime-d-une-cyber-attaque-2537316.html https://english.radio.cz/cyber-agency-says-attack-czech-states-road-and-motorway-directorate-encoded-data-8751033 https://www.securityweek.com/us-subsidiary-automotive-hose-maker-nichirin-hit-ransomware https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/135280/hacktivism/anonyomus-hacked-yandex-taxi.html https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/toyota-suspends-all-domestic-factory-operations-after-suspected-cyber-attack-2022-02-28/ https://en.tempo.co/read/1626771/jasa-marga-subsidiary-clarifies-alleged-hacking-data-leak https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/sep/06/go-ahead-cyberattack-bus-services-thameslink-rail

text: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/uber-links-breach-to-lapsus-group-blames-contractor-for-hack/ https://www.ibtimes.com/russians-novosibirsk-forced-pound-pavements-team-onefist-paralyzes-traffic-exclusive-3611628 https://blog.checkpoint.com/2022/05/10/a-german-car-attack-on-german-vehicle-businesses/ https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/after-power-chinese-hackers-target-transport-sector/article34125502.ece https://threatpost.com/attackers-impersonate-dot-phishing-scam/169484/?web_view=true https://www.securityweek.com/trend-micro-spots-chinese-hackers-targeting-transportation-sector https://industrialcyber.co/threats-attacks/ta2541-attackers-target-surface-transportation-manufacturing-defense-enterprises/ https://cybershafarat.com/2022/07/31/latvia-is-experiencing-perhaps-the-most-powerful-cyber-attack-in-its-history/ https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/microsoft-365-phishing-attacks-impersonate-us-govt-agencies/ https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2022/10/14/new-prestige-ransomware-impacts-organizations-in-ukraine-and-poland/

identifier: ENISA Transport Threat Landscape

nummer: enisa-transport-threat-landscape

title: ENISA Transport Threat Landscape

text: ENISA THREAT LANDSCAPE: TRANSPORT SECTOR (January 2021 to October 2022) MARCH 2023

text: ENISA THREAT LANDSCAPE: TRANSPORT SECTOR

text: March 2023

text: ABOUT ENISA

text: The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, ENISA, is the Union’s agency dedicated to achieving a high common level of cybersecurity across Europe. Established in 2004 and strengthened by the EU Cybersecurity Act, the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity contributes to EU cyber policy, enhances the trustworthiness of ICT products, services and processes with cybersecurity certification schemes, cooperates with Member States and EU bodies, and helps Europe prepare for the cyber challenges of tomorrow. Through knowledge sharing, capacity building and awareness raising, the Agency works together with its key stakeholders to strengthen trust in the connected economy, to boost resilience of the Union’s infrastructure and, ultimately, to keep Europe’s society and citizens digitally secure. More information about ENISA and its work can be found at: www.enisa.europa.eu. CONTACT To contact the authors, please use etl@enisa.europa.eu. For media enquiries about this paper, please use press@enisa.europa.eu. EDITORS Marianthi Theocharidou, Zoran Stanic, Athanasios Drougkas, Ricardo De Sousa Figueiredo, Eleni Tsekmezoglou, Rossen Naydenov, Ifigeneia Lella, Apostolos Malatras, ENISA CONTRIBUTORS Jasmin Ćosić, DEKRA SE Marius Iulian Mihailescu, Spiru Haret University ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the Members and Observers of the ENISA ad hoc Working Group on Cyber Threat Landscapes and the members of the Transport Resilience and Security Expert Group for their valuable feedback and comments in validating this report. We would like to thank the European Union Aviation Safety Agency and Eurocontrol’s European Air Traffic Management Computer Emergency Response Team for contributing with incident data to this document. LEGAL NOTICE This publication represents the views and interpretations of ENISA unless stated otherwise. It does not endorse a regulatory obligation of ENISA or of ENISA bodies pursuant to

text: Regulation (EU) No 2019/881

text: . ENISA has the right to alter, update or remove this publication or any of its contents. It is intended for information purposes only and it must be accessible free of charge. All references to it or its use as a whole or in part must show ENISA as its source. Third-party sources are quoted as appropriate. ENISA is not responsible or liable for the content of the external sources including external websites referenced in this publication. Neither ENISA nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for the use that might be made of the information contained in this publication. ENISA maintains its intellectual property rights in relation to this publication.

text: March 2023

text: COPYRIGHT NOTICE © European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), 2023 This publication is licenced under CC-BY 4.0 ‘Unless otherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated’. For any use or reproduction of photos or other materials that are not under ENISA copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. ISBN 978-92-9204-624-8, DOI:10.2824/553997, TP-04-23-081-EN-N

text: March 2023

text: CONTENTS

text: 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. CYBER THREATS TO THE TRANSPORT SECTOR 7 2.1 OBSERVED ACTIVITY 7 2.2 PRIME THREATS 10 2.3 THREAT ACTORS & MOTIVATION 14 2.4 IMPACT 17 3. SECTOR ANALYSIS 20 3.1 AVIATION SECTOR 26 3.2 MARITIME SECTOR 30 3.3 RAILWAY SECTOR 33 3.4 ROAD SECTOR 36 3.5 CROSS SECTOR ATTACKS 39 4. CONCLUSIONS 40 ANNEX: MAJOR INCIDENTS 43

text: March 2023

text: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

text: This is the first analysis conducted by the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) of the cyber threat landscape of the transport sector in the EU. The report aims to bring new insights into the reality of the transport sector by mapping and studying cyber incidents from January 2021 to October 2022. It identifies prime threats, actors and trends based on the analysis of cyberattacks targeting aviation, maritime, railway and road transport over a period of almost 2 years. During this period, the prime threats identified include: • ransomware attacks (38%), • data related threats (30%), • malware (17%), • denial-of-service (DoS), distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) and ransom denial-of-service (RDoS) attacks (16%), • phishing / spear phishing (10%), • supply-chain attacks (10%). During the reporting period, the threat actors with the biggest impact on the sector were state-sponsored actors, cybercriminals and hacktivists. We observed the following trends: • Ransomware attacks became the prominent threat against the sector in 2022. Ransomware has been steadily increasing and the transport sector has been affected similarly to the other sectors. • Cybercriminals are responsible for the majority of attacks on the transport sector (54%), and they target all subsectors. • Threat actors will increasingly conduct ransomware attacks with not only monetary motivations . • The increased hacktivist activity targeting the transport sector is likely to continue. • The increasing rate of DDoS attacks targeting the transport sector is likely to continue. • The main targets of DDoS attacks by hacktivists are European airports, railways and transport authorities. • During this reporting period, we did not receive reliable information on a cyberattack affecting the safety of transport. • The majority of attacks on the transport sector target information technology (IT) systems. Operational disruptions can occur as a consequence of these attacks, but the operational technology (OT) systems are rarely being targeted. • Ransomware groups will likely target and disrupt OT operations in the foreseeable future . The aviation sector is facing multiple threats, with data-related threats being the most prominent, coupled by ransomware and malware. Customer data of airlines and proprietary information of original equipment manufacturers (OEM) are the prime targeted assets of the sector. In 2022, there has been a rise in the number of ransomware attacks affecting airports. Fraudulent websites impersonating airlines have become a significant threat in 2022. The maritime sector experiences ransomware, malware, and phishing attacks targeted towards port authorities, port operators, and manufacturers. State-sponsored attackers often carry out politically motivated attacks leading to operational disruptions at ports and vessels. The railway sector also experiences ransomware and data-related threats primarily targeting IT systems like passenger services, ticketing systems, and mobile applications, causing service disruptions. Hacktivist groups have

text: March 2023

text: been conducting DDoS attacks against railway companies with an increasing rate, primarily due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The road transport sector faces predominantly ransomware attacks, followed by data-related threats and malware. Automotive industry, especially OEM and tier-X suppliers, has been targeted by ransomware leading to production disruptions. Data-related threats primarily target IT systems to acquire customer and employee data as well as proprietary information. There is a limited number of cyber incidents that cannot be placed in one specific subsector. These include general campaigns targeting the whole transportation sector in particular countries. These campaigns are often attributed to hacktivists and state-sponsored actors and are linked to geopolitical tensions. The report also highlights issues with the reporting of cyber incidents and the fact that we still have limited knowledge and information regarding such incidents. The analysis in this report indicates that publicly disclosed incidents are just the tip of the iceberg.

text: March 2023

text: 1. INTRODUCTION

text: This report brings insights into the cyber threat landscape of the transport sector, with a focus on the EU. The four transport sectors which are considered in scope are aviation, maritime , rail, and road transport, as these fall under the scope of the network and information security (NIS) directive . The report considers a wider scope of the transport ecosystem, and includes transport manufacturers and suppliers , and national transport authorities, to ensure that the threat landscape of the sector is more detailed. The ENISA Cybersecurity Threat Landscape Methodology was applied. ENISA has analysed cyber incidents targeting the transport sector from January 2021 to October 2022. This time period is referred to as the "reporting period" throughout the report. It should be noted that the data collection and analysis primarily focus on incidents observed in EU member states and then in other states around the world. This is by no means the complete list of incidents that occurred during the reporting period. ENISA gathered a list of major incidents based on open-source intelligence (OSINT) and ENISA’s own cyber threat intelligence capabilities. For the aviation sector specifically, these were complemented by incidents reported to EASA and the European Centre for Cybersecurity in Aviation , and by incidents provided by Eurocontrol’s EATM-CERT for the aviation sector . The data collected were further analysed by ENISA’s threat landscape team. These incidents serve as the foundation for identifying the list of prime threats and the source material for several trends and statistics in the report. The incidents were analysed in detail to identify their core elements, providing answers to some important questions, such as how the attacks happen, which systems are being targeted and which transport subsectors are most affected. An in-depth desk research of available literature from open sources, such as news media articles, expert opinions, intelligence reports, incident analyses and security research reports, were conducted by ENISA and external experts. Within the report, we differentiate between what has been reported by our sources and what is our assessment. When conducting an assessment, we convey probability by using words that express an estimate of probability . The report is structured as follows. • Chapter 1, Introduction, provides an overview of the scope and the method used to produce this report. • Chapter 2, Cyber threats to the transport sector, analyses the observed activity observed during the reporting period. It provides insights on the prime threats, threat actors and their motivation, along with the assessed impact of these attacks. • Chapter 3, Sector Analysis, analyses in more detail the prime threats and the targets on each of the four subsectors covered. • Chapter 4, Conclusions, discusses the trends derived by the analysis and some considerations on the availability of data for incidents affecting the sector. • Annex, Major incidents, gathers a summary of selected notable incidents collected during the reporting period.

text: March 2023

text: 2. CYBER THREATS TO THE TRANSPORT SECTOR

text: 2.1 OBSERVED ACTIVITY From January 2021 until October 2022, we analysed a total of 98 publicly reported incidents . In 2022, we observed a 25% increase in the monthly average number of reported incidents affecting the transport sector compared to 2021 (see quarterly results in Figure 1). The reporting period ends in October 2022 and the analysis of the incidents was concluded in December 2022. This is why the number of incidents appears lower in Q4 2022 compared with the previous quarters. We are expecting a further increase of cyber incidents in 2022, especially if we consider that incident handling and analysis is ongoing and that the reporting of incidents often occurs at a later date. However, an increase in the number of reported cyber-attacks does not necessarily mean that the number of attacks has actually increased. This change could be due to the sector maturing in terms of incident detection and reporting. For example, this could be due to the effect of the legal obligation to report incidents under the NIS directive and/or national regulations. Alternatively, the attention of the media or the public could be focused on a particular sector for a particular time period, resulting in more incidents appearing in OSINT sources. Figure 1: Number of incidents per quarter (January 2021 to October 2022)

text: March 2023

text: An important aspect involves the proximity of transport related cyber threats with respect to the European Union. We classify incidents according to the proposed classification for the EU common security and defence policy , as follows. Near – Affected networks, systems, controlled and assured within EU borders. Affected population within the borders of the EU. Mid – Networks and systems considered vital for operational objectives within the scope of the EU digital single market and the NIS directive sectors, but their control and assurance rely on non-EU institutional authorities or Member State public or private authorities. Affected population in geographical areas close to EU borders. Far – Networks and systems that, if influenced, will have a critical impact on operational objectives within the scope of the EU digital single market and the NIS directive sectors. Control and assurance of those networks and systems lies beyond EU institutional authorities and Member States’ public or private authorities. Affected population in geographical areas Far from the EU. Global – All the aforementioned areas. The following map gives an overview of the incidents observed in the world for the reporting period, while Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the proximity of incidents to the EU for 2021 and 2022 respectively. Figure 2: Map of observed incidents (January 2021 to October 2022)

text: Note: the size of the circle refers to the sum of observed incidents in the country during the reporting period.

text: March 2023

text: As mentioned above, the data collection process prioritises incidents that occur in the EU. Even with this limitation, we can safely assess that in 2022 there was a significant increase of incidents that were made public and affected the EU (category ‘Near’) and areas close to the EU (category ‘Mid’), compared to 2021. This comes as no surprise considering the current geopolitical situation in which the EU is involved and the significance which was placed on the transport sector during Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine. Figure 3: Proximity of observed incidents Figure 4: Proximity of observed incidents (January 2021 to December 2021) (January 2022 to October 2022)

text: March 2023

text: 2.2 PRIME THREATS During the reporting period, we observed the following types of threats (Figure 5) to the transport sector. An incident can be categorised in more than one threat category, which means that the total percentage of the threats shown in Figure 5 exceeds 100%. For example, the attack vector for initial access may include a phishing campaign, which is then followed by a compromise with ransomware. Likewise, incidents which included an attack to a supplier were categorised both as supply-chain attacks and as the type of attack used for the compromise. Figure 5: Prime threats to the transport sector (January 2021 to October 2022) Ransomware Ransomware is defined as a type of attack where threat actors take control of a target’s assets and demand a ransom in exchange for the return of the asset’s availability . Ransomware incidents are presented separately from malware, as they are significant portion of the identified incidents (38%) during the reporting period, with several high profile and highly publicised incidents. Threats against data Sources of data are being targeted with the aim of unauthorised access and disclosure and manipulating data to interfere with the behaviour of systems. These threats are also the basis of many other threats, also discussed in this report. For instance, ransomware, or DDoS attacks aim to deny access to data and possibly collect a payment to restore this access. Technically speaking, threats against data can mainly be classified as data breaches and data leaks. A data breach is an intentional attack brought by a cybercriminal with the goal of gaining unauthorised access and the release of sensitive, confidential or protected data. A data leak is an event that can cause the unintentional release of sensitive, confidential or protected data due to, for example, misconfigurations, vulnerabilities or human errors. In this reporting period, around 30% of the observed incidents were a form of threat against the data of transport organisations. Malware Malware is an overarching term used to describe any software or firmware intended to perform an unauthorised process that will have an adverse impact on the confidentiality, integrity or availability of a system. Traditionally,

text: March 2023

text: examples of malicious code types include viruses, worms, trojan horses, spyware, adware or other code-based entities that infect a host. During this reporting period, 17% of incidents targeting the transport sector involved malware. Denial of service Availability is the target of a plethora of threats and attacks, among which DDoS stands out. DDoS attacks target system and data availability and, though not a new threat, have a significant role in the cybersecurity threat landscape of the transport sector. Attacks occur when users of a system or service are not able to access relevant data, services or other resources. This can be accomplished by exhausting the service and its resources or overloading the components of the network infrastructure. During the reporting period, geopolitical developments and hacktivist activity increased the number of DDoS attacks against transport organisations, reaching 16% of total incidents. Vulnerability exploitation Vulnerability exploitation refers to exploitation of known or zero-day vulnerabilities . Social engineering Social engineering encompasses a broad range of activities that attempt to exploit a human error or human behaviour with the objective of gaining access to information or services. It uses various forms of manipulation to trick victims into making mistakes or handing over sensitive or secret information. In cybersecurity, social engineering lures users into opening documents, files or emails, visiting websites or granting unauthorised persons access to systems or services. This threat canvas consists mainly of the following vectors: phishing, spear-phishing, whaling, smishing, vishing, business email compromise, fraud, impersonation and counterfeiting. In this reporting period, we primarily observed phishing and spear phishing attacks targeting transport users (10%) and fraud, impersonation and counterfeit incidents (6%). Attacks to suppliers and supply-chain attacks A supply-chain attack targets the relationship between organisations and their suppliers. For this report we use the definition as stated in the ENISA Threat Landscape for Supply Chain, where an attack is considered to have a supply-chain component when it consists of a combination of at least two attacks. For an attack to be classified as a supply-chain attack, both the supplier and the customer have to be targets. It seems that threat actors are continuing to feed on this source to conduct their operations and gain a foothold within organisations, in an attempt to benefit from the widespread impact and potential victim base of such attacks. In this reporting period, we observed both supply-chain attacks, as defined above, and attacks to suppliers that caused disruptions or losses to entities in the transport sector (10% of total incidents). This impact was not necessarily the effect of a secondary attack. Breach/intrusion Breach/intrusion refers to incidents where an attack to a system has been confirmed or made public and attackers have gained access to systems, but the details of how the breach or the intrusion took place are not clear. These types of incidents account for 9% of the total number of incidents. Other threats include single occasions of credential harvesting and spoofing of geolocation in the maritime sector. Finally, there is a small percentage of incidents where even though a cyberattack took place, there is insufficient information to allow for the incident to be categorised. This accounts for a total of 7% of incidents (unknowns).

text: March 2023

text: Figure 6: Prime threats to the transport sector: 2021 v 2022 The data on incidents collected until October 2022 indicate an increase in reporting of ransomware attacks during 2022. The number of ransomware attacks reported to the transport sector almost doubled, rising to 25% in 2022 from 13% during 2021. Contrary to ransomware, we observed a decline in malware incidents in 2022 compared to 2021 (from 11% to 6%). Data related threats (breaches, leaks) declined compared to ransomware, but remain significant. The attacks observed in 2021 and 2022 targeted credentials, the personal data of employees and passengers, corporate data and intellectual property. We also observed an increase in DDoS attacks in 2022, which is mostly linked to recent activity by hacktivists. The rates of these attacks are focused on specific regions and are affected by current geopolitical tensions. The current geopolitical situation and its effect on the transport sector can be seen in Figure 7. The map depicts selected incidents in all transport sectors which were attributed to hacktivism. The motivation was primarily operational disruption and ideological.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 7: Global map of incidents (hacktivism)

text: Note: the size of the circle refers to the sum of observed incidents in the country during the reporting period. 13

text: March 2023

text: 2.3 THREAT ACTORS & MOTIVATION • Cybercriminals’ primary motive is financial gain, often stealing data or demanding ransom. • Hackers-for-hire sell their services to people who do not have the skills or capabilities to do so. • State-sponsored actors target organisations to compromise, steal, change, or destroy information. These groups are usually affiliated with a nation state . • Hacktivists are politically, socially, or ideologically motivated and target victims for publicity or to effect change. For the cases in which one of these types of actors was not identified, we either categorised the incident as an individual actor or as unknown. During the reporting, we did not have information on hacker-for-hire actors targeting the transport sector, so they are not included in Figure 8. Figure 8: Actors Figure 8 shows the overall activity of actors targeting the sector, while Figure 9 analyses this activity on a monthly basis.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 9: Actor activity (January 2021 to October 2022)

text: March 2023

text: For the analysis of the incidents, we have considered the following motivations. • Espionage, when the aim of the attack is information gathering (either intellectual property or information of national importance). • Financial gain, when there is a clear monetary claim behind the attack, such as extortion, selling of stolen data, etc. • Ideological, when the attack is linked to hacktivist activity and there are clear declarations on the aim of the attack by the actor. • Operational disruption, when the attack is aiming at disrupting services, as opposed to cases where a disruption of operations is a side effect of an attack. Figure 10: Motivation More than half of the incidents observed in the reporting period were linked to cybercriminals (55%). This is also linked with the motivation behind these attacks which is predominately financial gain (38%). The transport sector is considered a lucrative business for cybercriminals, with customer data considered a commodity and with highly valuable proprietary information when transport supply chain is being targeted. One fourth of the attacks are linked to hacktivist groups (23%), with the motivation of their attacks usually being linked to the geopolitical environment and aiming at operational disruption (20%) or ideological motivation (6%).

text: March 2023

text: 2.4 IMPACT When considering the impact of an incident to the sector, we analysed who was the target of the attack (Figure 11) and which were the affected assets (Figure 12). As the types of targeted entities differ between subsectors, Figure 11 offers a breakdown of the targets by subsector. Please note that one incident may be targeting multiple transport entities. All subsectors had authorities and bodies that were being targeted, in fact 38% of the incidents targeted transport authorities. In the railway sector, incidents almost exclusively targeted railway undertakings and infrastructure managers. Similarly, port operators were the most affected entities in the maritime sector. These two sectors had only a few incidents targeting supply chain or service providers. This was not the case in the road sector, where OEM, tier- X suppliers and service providers were targeted, along with public transport operators. In the aviation sector, airlines and airport operators are the main targets, followed by service providers, surface transport operators and the supply chain. Figure 11: Targets (number of incidents per entity type)

text: March 2023

text: Figure 12: Affected assets Detailed and reliable information about the impact of incidents is not readily available in OSINT reports. It can often be deduced from the description of the incident, but the impact assessment can often include a lower level of confidence. In particular, reputational, legal and social impacts are particularly difficult to assess. Similarly, financial impact can be calculated in various ways by the affected party and it can change over time as the effect of an incident develops and its long-term consequences are assessed. For this reason, we were able to include only reported digital or physical impact in the analysis. Figure 13: Digital impact Digital impact (Figure 13) refers to any effect of the attack on the information and communications technology (ICT) systems of the affected entity, while physical impact (Figure 14) refers to cases where the incident causes operational disruption or even destruction of the infrastructure. As we observe, we have more rich information when it comes to the digital impact of cyberattacks on the transport sector. For physical impact, we could not find information of the

text: March 2023

text: actual physical impact for the majority of incidents, as either information was not disclosed or physical impact did not take place. Figure 14: Physical impact An alternative dataset which gives a better indication of the impact of attacks are the incidents reported to ENISA by national authorities under the provisions of the NIS directive . These refer to incidents that cause significant impact. At the time of publication data for 2022 were not yet available, data were available only for 2021. In 2021, 34 incidents had a significant impact on transport entities. They account for 6% of the total number of incidents reported to ENISA in 2021. In fact, 65% of these incidents were the result of malicious actions, 32% were due to system failures and 3% were due to human error. These data highlight a significant gap in finding information on nonmalicious incidents that can cause disruptions to the transport sector, as these are rarely available in OSINT reports.

text: March 2023

text: 3. SECTOR ANALYSIS

text: In this section we further analyse the findings for each transport sector. We distinguish between incidents targeting aviation, maritime, railway and road transport, while we also include a category called ‘all transport’ which refers to attacks that target either all four sectors or, more commonly, ministries of transport. For the reporting period, we studied 27 incidents targeting aviation (28%), 18 incidents targeting maritime (18%), 21 incidents targeting railway (21%) and 24 incidents targeting road transport (24%). We also included 8 incidents (8%) that targeted the transport sector as a whole, or incidents targeting transport ministries. Figure 15: Observed incidents in each sector Figure 16: Annual observed incidents in each sector (January 2021 to December 2021, January 2022 to October 2022) Figure 17 shows the monthly incidents in each sector for the reporting period.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 17: Monthly observed incidents in each sector

text: March 2023

text: Figure 18 shows the geographical spread of the observed incidents. We can see here that the focus of the report is on the incidents that affect EU transport and the neighbouring countries. However, we have included significant incidents from the world, targeting transport entities primarily in North America and Asia. The map also gives an indication of the geographical spread of affected subsectors. Figure 18: Global map of observed incidents

text: March 2023

text: In Figure 19 and Figure 20 we depict the motivation and the actors of the observed incidents for each sector. Figure 19: Motivation in each sector Figure 20: Actor in each sector Cybercriminals are the main actors responsible for attacks on the transport sector (54% of the total number of incidents) and they target all subsectors. They use the ‘follow the money’ philosophy in their modus operandi. Almost 23 ENISA THREAT LANDSCAPE: TRANSPORT SECTOR

text: March 2023

text: two fifths of the total number of incidents are incidents attributed to cybercriminals targeting two sectors: aviation and road transport. During the reporting period, 18% of cybercriminals targeted the aviation sector (primarily airports and airlines and their customers) and 19% targeted the road sector (primarily the automotive industry). Likewise, the motivation behind attacks on these two sectors was primarily financial gain (11% and 13% of the total number of incidents, respectively), as the aviation and automotive industries are considered to be the more lucrative ones for cybercriminals. The attacks are considered opportunistic in nature, as we have not observed known groups targeting the transport sector exclusively. We observe that hacktivists have claimed responsibility for attacks on the railway (8%) and aviation (6%) sectors, and this has to do mainly with attacks linked to the Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine. In particular, these types of attacks make up almost one tenth of the total number of incidents that aimed at operational disruption in the railway sector. State-sponsored actors were more often attributed to targeting the maritime sector or targeting government authorities of transport (‘All transport’ category). Figure 21 presents the sectorial analysis of all observed threats. We observe that there are differences in how these threats affect specific sectors. These differences are discussed in greater detail in the chapters that follow.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 21: Prime threats in each sector (number of observed incidents)

text: March 2023

text: 3.1 AVIATION SECTOR According to the data collected through OSINT by ENISA and the EU aviation safety agency (see Figure 22), prime threats for the aviation sector are data-related threats (45%), ransomware (36%) and malware (23%). In the majority of ransomware cases in the aviation sector, the attack is followed by data-related threats, such as data exfiltration and leakage, so there is significant overlap in these two categories. Customer data are one of the prime targeted assets of the sector, followed by the proprietary information of original equipment manufacturers (OEM). Figure 22: Aviation - prime threats In 2022, we observed an increase in the number of ransomware attacks affecting airports (see Figure 23). Out of all operators (excluding original equipment manufacturers), airport operators are the most affected by ransomware attacks. Airports, airlines and ultimately the passengers suffer due to other incidents that have an impact on their data. The most notable events include the following. • In March 2021 the passenger service system provider SITA was hacked; hundreds of thousands of Star Alliance passengers’ details were stolen. • In April 2021 a malware attack on Radixx Res disrupts 20 airlines’ ticket reservation systems . The service disruption made it impossible for many of the airline passengers to make, change, delete or confirm bookings through the airlines’ websites, although flight operations were not affected. • In May 2021 Air India suffered a data breach. 4.5 million customers were impacted only 2 months after its passenger service system provider SITA was hacked. • In August 2021 Bangkok Air confirmed the leak of passenger data after a ransomware attack . According to the airline, some of the personal data that may have been included in the stolen files included data fields such as passenger name, family name, nationality, gender, phone number, email address, home address, contact information, passport information, historical travel information, partial credit card information and special meal information.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 23: Aviation - prime threats (annually) • In January 2022 Dassault Falcon Jet was hit by the Ragnar Locker ransomware gang . The attack may have led to the exposure of personal information belonging to current and former employees, and their spouses and dependents. • In February 2022 Swissport International was hit by a ransomware attack that had a severe impact on its operations, causing flights to suffer delays. Following the attack, the perpetrators (BlackCat) leaked data which included business documents, tax declarations, images of passports and ID cards of individuals. Leaked data also included personal information of job candidates . • In May 2022, after a ransomware attack on SpiceJet, hundreds of passengers were stranded at airports across India, particularly those airports where restrictions on night operations were in effect . • In May 2022 a Turkish airline exposed flight and crew information in a 6.5 terabyte leak . • In August 2022 Accelya, a technology firm providing services to Delta, British Airways, JetBlue, United, Virgin Atlantic, American Airlines and many others, confirmed that company data was posted on a ransomware leak site . • In August 2022 TAP Air Portugal was the target of a Ragnar Locker ransomware attack. The attackers leaked customers’ names, addresses and telephone numbers .

text: March 2023

text: • In October 2022 ransomware group LockBit 3.0 claimed to have compromised the aeronautical French defence and technology firm Thales Group . • In October 2022 it was claimed on the Black Basta data leak website that the United States (US) aerospace and defence company Genesys Aerosystems, which mainly produces advanced avionics solutions and components, was a ransomware victim . The data collected and analysed by Eurocontrol’s EATM-CERT highlight a threat that often goes underreported in open sources. The main threat which is being reported to Eurocontrol is fraudulent websites impersonating airlines. From January 2022 to June 2022, fraudulent websites accounted for 46% of incidents reported to Eurocontrol. This discrepancy is due to the fact that this information is not often made publicly available. It is linked to the sector’s victimology, which is mainly airlines and their customers being targeted. The rest of the threats reported to Eurocontrol for the first semester of 2022 were web application attacks (22%), DDoS attacks (13%), phishing attempts (12%), ransomware (6%) and malware (1%). DDoS attacks were primarily observed by ENISA in 2022 and were linked with hacktivist activity against airports and aviation authorities, such as the following. • In April 2022 the website of the Israel Airports Authority was temporarily taken offline due to a denial-ofservice attack . • In May 2022 a pro-Russia hacker group launched an attack on the websites of Italian ministries, including 30. attacks targeting Italian airports • In June 2022 pro-Russia hacker group NoName057 targeted Lithuanian airports with DDoS attacks . • In October 2022 Russian threat actors (e.g. Anonymous Russia) led DDoS attacks on airports in Bratislava 32 33 , Budapest and Bulgaria , targeting their websites. • In October 2022 the websites of major US airports were disrupted due to a large-scale campaign of DDoS attacks, in which pro-Russian hacker group Killnet flooded servers with web traffic to take websites offline. Eurocontrol EATM-CERT collected and shared with ENISA 97 individual cases where pro-Russian hacker group Killnet targeted airports in the EU and neighbouring countries during 2022 (proximity ‘Near’, Mid’). The map of this activity is depicted in Figure 24. Data collected from ENISA and Eurocontrol indicate that airspace users/airlines are the main victims of attacks (see Figure 25). This is mainly due to the financial motivation behind these attacks, which is predominant in the sector. Airlines are being targeted directly by attacks to their systems and indirectly by attacks targeting their customers (e.g. by fraudulent websites). Eurocontrol reports airspace users (80%), airports (12%), OEMs / supply chain (6%), air navigation service providers (1%) and civil aviation authorities (1%) as the main targets for January 2022 to June 2022.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 24: Airports targeted by Killnet in Europe and neighbouring countries during 2022

text: Note: the size of the circle refers to the sum of observed incidents in the country during the reporting period. Country (sum of attacks to airports): Poland (25), Czechia (13), Romania (13), Lithuania (11), Latvia (8), Italy (6), Bulgaria (4), Ukraine (4), Germany (3), Norway (3), Estonia (2), Slovakia (2), United Kingdom (2), Hungary (1).

text: Figure 25: Aviation - targets

text: March 2023

text: 3.2 MARITIME SECTOR The proliferation of cybersecurity incidents in ports over the last few years, such as the cyberattack on Antwerp 36 37 port , the NotPetya ransomware incident and its impact on Maersk and the wave of ransomware attacks on the 38 39 Port of Barcelona and San Diego , has led to a change in the sector's cyber risk profile. Figures 26 and 27 show the threats targeting the maritime sector overall and on an annual basis. Figure 26: Maritime - prime threats Attacks in the maritime domain are often politically motivated and perpetrated by state-sponsored attackers. During 2021 and 2022, a few notable cases of activities linked to state actors were reported. These attacks indicate the interest of state sponsored actors to cause operational disruption by targeting ports and vessels. In early 2021, it was reported that two Indian sea ports were targeted by Chinese hackers amid geopolitical tensions . In August 2021 the Port of Houston Authority was targeted by a cybersecurity attack which is believed to have originated from a nation-state actor. In October 2021 Microsoft reported that ‘Iran-linked’ hackers targeted US, EU and Israeli defence and maritime sectors with password spray attacks . May 2022 Israel was linked to a disruptive cyberattack on an Iranian port facility . Computers that regulate the flow of vessels, trucks and goods all crashed at once, creating massive congestions on waterways and roads leading to the facility. In May 2022 the Port of London Authority was hit by a DDoS attack, which temporarily took the Port of London’s website offline. The attack is believed to have been carried out by the Iran-affiliated Altahrea group and politically rather than financially

text: March 2023

text: motivated . This group is known for having made multiple DDoS attacks on Israeli targets, including the Israel Ports Authority, in the past. Finally, an interesting threat that may affect vessels is the spoofing of the automatic identification system by a hostile state, although we have not seen many occurrences of this threat in the past. Figure 27: Maritime - prime threats (annually) When it comes to activity by cybercriminals or individual actors, we primarily observe ransomware, malware and phishing / spear-phishing attacks targeting the port authorities, port operators or manufacturers (supply chain) (see Figure 28). Examples include the following. • In February 2021 French boat building giant Beneteau announced that it had suffered a malware intrusion on some of its servers and that it had decided to disconnect all ‘information systems’ to prevent the malware from spreading. Several production units, notably in France, had to slow down or stop their production activities for a few days .

text: March 2023

text: • In June 2021 the Massachusetts Steamship Authority was targeted by a ransomware attack which brought down its website and caused delays for ferry passengers. • In August 2021 the Compagnie générale de navigation sur le Lac Léman fell victim to a cyberattack on its website, targeting the ticketing system. The hackers managed to steal the bank details of some customers . • In September 2021 French carrier CMA CGM confirmed a data leak, which involved customer information, including names, employers, positions, email and phone details . • In November 2021 a ransomware attack on the maritime IT company Danaos (ICT service provider) affected several Greek shipping companies who used the Danaos’ communication systems . Reportedly, the cyberattack blocked their communication with ships, suppliers, agents, charterers and suppliers, while at the same time the files with their correspondence were lost. • In February 2022 a suspected ransomware attack knocked out the management information system at the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Container Terminal, one of five container terminals in India’s top container gateway, the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (Nhava Sheva). The Jawaharlal Nehru Port Container Terminal had one of its scheduled vessels divert to a nearby terminal after it abruptly stopped accepting vessels. At the same time, the system breakdown left port users no choice but to revert to paper-based cargo processing. This caused major traffic problems at the gates of the port, also disrupting traffic at the gates of other terminals . Moreover, there were major disruptions in other ports where we lack information on what type of attack took place. For example, in July 2021 four major ports in South Africa (Cape Town, Ngqura, Port Elizabeth and Durban) were paralysed following a massive attack on the Transnet National Port Authority, the country’s main freight manager . In January 2022, several northern European oil hubs in major ports were the target of cyberattacks . IT systems have been disrupted at Oiltanking in Germany, SEA-Invest in Belgium and Evos in the Netherlands. Figure 28: Maritime - targets

text: March 2023

text: 3.3 RAILWAY SECTOR Figure 29 and Figure 30 show the threats targeting the railway sector overall and on an annual basis. Ransomware and data-related threats are the two main threats targeting the railway sector (45% and 25%, respectively), followed by DDoS attacks with an increasing rate. Ransomware and Data-related threats are closely interlinked, as a ransomware attack is often followed by data leakage or exfiltration. Figure 29: Railway - prime threats The majority of the attacks observed targeted the IT systems of railways (passenger services, ticketing systems, mobile application, display boards, etc.) and caused disruptions due to the unavailability of these services. Examples include the ransomware attacks targeting Skånetrafiken (August 2021) and Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane (March 2022), which resulted in customers not being able to buy tickets following infections to IT systems. The only cases were OT systems and networks were affected were either when entire networks were affected or when safety-critical IT systems were unavailable. Notable data thefts include the cases of OmniTRAX, MTA, Norfolk Southern Railroads and Lokaltog A/S, where personnel and medical records were stolen. The case of OmniTRAX represents the first publicly known case of a double-extortion ransomware attack against a US freight rail operator. Another interesting case includes the service disruptions to the Danish train operator DSB’s network (October 2022) due to an attack on one of its ICT service providers after an alleged DDoS attack. The incident reportedly affected the accessibility of a key safety-critical IT system, thereby disrupting DSB operations for several hours that day. Finally, an interesting case is the one of hacktivists launching a ransomware attack on the Belarusian state-run train company in a bid to disrupt Russian troop movements (January 2022). To achieve this, the group deployed modified ransomware to bring down the railway system and encrypted servers, databases and workstations belonging to the Belarusian railway service.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 30: Railway - prime threats (annually) Figure 31: Railway - targets

text: March 2023

text: DDoS attacks were on the rise in 2022, reaching one fifth of the attacks on the railway sector (20%). This is primarily due to the increased hacktivist activity which followed Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine. Hacktivist elements with pro-Russian/anti-NATO sentiments have been conducting DDoS attacks against railway companies. Examples include pro-Russia hacker groups claiming responsibility for attacks on railway transport operator CFR Calatori (April 2022), Lithuanian Railways (June 2022), Latvian passenger train company SJSC (June 2022) and Estonian Railways (August 2022). When it comes to vulnerabilities (15%), two cases stand out. In December 2021 Canadian transportation agency Metrolinx temporarily took down their website as a precautionary measure, after being informed by the federal government about a cyber vulnerability. In January 2022, an anonymous hacker reported a vulnerability impacting the Swiss national railway system and potentially allowing access to customers’ personal data.

text: March 2023

text: 3.4 ROAD SECTOR Figure 32 and Figure 33 show the threats targeting the road sector overall and on annual basis. Ransomware is the predominant threat (43%) for the road transport sector, followed by data-related threats (26%) and malware (17%). Figure 32: Road - prime threats Ransomware has targeted the automotive industry, in particular OEMs and tier-X suppliers. In some cases, the production of vehicles or parts had to stop due to an attack. Notable cases include the following. • In September 2021 Dutch car company Bochane fell victim to a ransomware attack. According to the report, which was published on the company website, a lot of their computers were blocked for a day . • In February 2022 Toyota Motor Corporation suspended factory operations for a day, losing around 13 000 cars of output, after a supplier of plastic parts and electronic components was hit by a suspected cyberattack . • In February 2022 Kia Motors America suffered a ransomware attack by the DoppelPaymer gang, demanding USD 20 million for a decrypter and to not leak stolen data. The attack was acknowledged in the public domain after Kia Motors America portals faced major outages and internal disruptions to its customer-facing systems across the country . • In March 2022 Japanese car parts giant Denso shut down the network connections of compromised devices after detecting a breach. The incident has not led to the disruption of production activities, with plants continuing to operate normally. However, the hacker group Pandora has taken credit for the attack, claiming to have stolen 1.4 terabytes of data.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 33: Road - prime threats (annually) • In April 2022 Germany’s car rental giant Sixt was hit by cyberattack . All non-essential services were shut down. It was assumed that ransomware groups are focusing on an organisation like Sixt because of the upcoming tourist season. • In May 2022 AGCO Corporation sites in China, France, Germany and the US suffered a ransomware attack, making servers inaccessible and halting production for 2 days . • In June 2022 a US subsidiary of Nichirin , a Japanese company that makes hoses for the automotive industry, was hit by ransomware. The incident forced the company to shut down some production control systems and switch to manual processes.

text: March 2023

text: Figure 34: Road - targets Data-related threats primarily targeted IT systems in an effort to acquire customer or employee data and proprietary information. In February 2021, hackers published the data of more than 3.2 million users of DriveSure (US car dealership service provider focused on employee training programmes and customer retention) . According to the sources, hackers published leaked folders with over 22 GB of MySQL databases with not only personal information, but also 93 063 hashed passwords and emails with clients. In August 2021, Skånetrafiken (Sweden’s regional public transportation authority and operator) was, for the second time, the subject of cyberattacks. The target was ticketing 60 61 machines and the website for buying tickets . Strætó (public transport company which operates city buses in the Icelandic capital) also fell victim to cyberattacks, where the personal data of employees was stolen. Notable cases of proprietary information being stolen or leaked include the attacks on Tesla and Volvo. In September 2021 Tesla’s ‘top-secret full self-driving AI car software’ , which enables Tesla cars to drive autonomously, was leaked, enabling hackers outside the US to use this functionality. In December 2021 Volvo disclosed in a press release that unknown attackers had stolen R & D information by hacking some of their servers, but did not confirm the nature of the attack, which was allegedly a ransomware attack.

text: March 2023

text: 3.5 CROSS SECTOR ATTACKS Finally, there is a limited number of cyber incidents that cannot be placed in one specific subsector. These include general campaigns targeting the whole transportation sector in particular countries. These campaigns are often attributed to hacktivists and state-sponsored actors and are linked to geopolitical tensions. Moreover, there are also incidents where attackers directly target transport agencies. Examples include incidents of impersonation, such as in the case of the US Department of Transport, which was the target of phishing attacks both 64 65 in September 2021 and in September 2022 . For more examples of these types of attacks, please refer to the Annex. Figure 35: Threats targeting the transport sector as a whole The report did not analyse the effect of cyber-attacks which target sectors that transport depends on. Such an analysis would include energy and telecommunication. This is an interesting aspect to examine in future threat landscapes.

text: March 2023

text: 4. CONCLUSIONS

text: In this report, we have performed a deep dive into the threat landscape of a particular sector, namely the transport sector. While the annual ENISA threat landscapes include sectorial analysis, the documents do not analyse the context of each sector in depth. In this report, we have tried to shed more light in the types of incidents, the actor motivations, the affected assets, the victims and the potential impacts to the transport sector. This information is often sector specific and can provide more valuable information for risk management to the cybersecurity professionals in the transport sector. Ransomware attacks became the most significant threat against the sector during 2022, surpassing datarelated threats, which were the most significant threat in 2021 . However, it is still assessed that ransomware groups remain opportunistic and relatively indiscriminate in their targeting. Recent months do not indicate that there has been any particular focus on the transport sector relative to other sectors. Ransomware has been steadily increasing and the transport sector has been affected similarly to the other sectors. Our assessment is that threat actors will increasingly conduct ransomware attacks with not only monetary motivations . An example is the ransomware attack by Belarusian hacktivists against the Belarusian state railway in January 2022 . Hacktivists will likely be attracted by the effectiveness and the impact that ransomware attacks can have and the media attention they attract. The scale and sophistication of hacktivists’ ransomware operations are not expected to be as high as the ones conducted by cybercriminals. Finally, governmental organisations are very likely the primary targets of hacktivists’ ransomware operations. The significant increase in hacktivist activity, which followed Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, and the increasing rate of DDoS attacks are highly likely to continue. Hacktivist elements with pro-Russian/anti- NATO sentiments have been conducting DDoS attacks. These attacks targeted several European nations, perceived by the groups to be assisting Ukraine in its war effort. This increasing volume of DDoS attacks against the European transport sector was primarily observed in Q2 and Q3 2022. The main targets were European airports, railways and transport authorities. Several examples are listed below (see Annex for further information). • In April 2022 pro-Russia hacker group Killnet claimed to be behind attacks on Romanian government websites, including railway transport operator CFR Calatori . • In May 2022 Czechia’s Directorate of Roads and Highways was targeted with DDoS attacks by Killnet, resulting in disruption to web-based services . • In May 2022 Several Italian transport organisations were targeted with DDoS attacks by Legion - Cyber Spetsnaz RF . • In June 2022 Killnet claimed to have disrupted the website of Lithuanian Railways, preventing passengers from purchasing train tickets online . • In June 2022 Latvian passenger train company SJSC was targeted with DDoS attacks, likely by pro-Russian hacktivists . • In July 2022 NoName057 targeted two Lithuanian airports with DDoS attacks .

text: March 2023

text: • In August 2022 Killnet claimed responsibility for attacks to more than 200 state and private Estonian institutions, including Estonia Railways . • In August 2022 a pro-Russia hacker group known as the Cyber Army of Russia targeted the Ukrainian government’s Department of Transport Safety. Even though pro-Russian hacktivists continue to target transport organisations in Ukraine and neighbouring countries, the capabilities of most pro-Russian hacktivists remain low and are largely limited to DDoS and defacement attacks. On the other hand, hacktivists supporting Ukraine have been conducting DDoS and ‘hack and leak’ operations. Some examples include the following. • In March 2022 hacktivist collective Anonymous (presumably) carried out an attack on the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency, deleting approximately 65 terabytes of data . • In April 2022 Anonymous-linked group GhostSec claimed to have accessed an IT system of Metrospetstekhnika . • In August 2022 Anonymous claimed to have hacked Yandex Taxi, causing a massive traffic jam in Moscow . • In September 2022 transport in Novosibirsk was affected as hacker security group Team Onefist disrupted traffic . The majority of attacks to the transport sector target IT systems and can result in operational disruptions. However, we have not received reliable information on a cyber-attack affecting the safety of transport. 66. The factors Ransomware groups will likely target and disrupt OT operations in the foreseeable future contributing to this assessment are: • the ongoing digital transformation in the transport sector and the increased connectivity between IT and OT networks; • the increased urgency to pay ransom to avoid any critical business and social impact; • the ongoing rebranding of ransomware groups, which increases the chances of malware blending and the development of capabilities to target and disrupt OT networks; • Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine, as ransomware groups are taking sides and are likely to conduct retaliatory attacks against critical western infrastructure; • the increase in the number of newly identified vulnerabilities in OT environments. The analysis of the ransomware threat landscape from May 2021 to June 2022 resulted in some conclusions that can be regarded as lessons for the community. While we have not observed notable attacks on global positioning systems, the potential effect of this type of threat to the transport sector remains a concern. Jamming and spoofing of geolocation data could affect their availability and integrity, affecting transport sector operations. This type of attack requires further analysis in the future. When it comes to mitigating threats which target the transport sector, readers may consult the recommendations and security measures included in Annex D of the ENISA Threat Landscape 2022 . For each threat type, specific recommendations are provided and mapped to security measures that are part of international standards used by entities under the NIS Directive, including transport organizations .

text: March 2023

text: In general, cyberattacks are rarely reported, especially those with non-significant impact or near misses. Most organisations prefer to deal with the problem internally and avoid bad publicity. Some countries have laws regulating the mandatory reporting of incidents, but in most cases a security attack is first disclosed by the attacker. In the EU, the arrival of the revised NIS2 directive and the enhanced notification provisions for security incidents is expected to support a better understanding of relevant incidents. The lack of reliable data from targeted organisations makes it very hard to fully understand the problem or even know how many cyberattacks on the transport sector actually occur. Even using the data from the web pages of threat actors (an undeniably unreliable source), it is very hard to keep track of the actual number of attacks. The most important information that is missing is the technical explanation as to how the attackers obtained access to the targets. This is usually private data that describes the security posture of the target, so it is never shared with the public. As a consequence, our learning as a community of the problems to be solved remains fragmented and isolated. Moreover, the effects of cross sector dependencies could be of particular interest to the transport sector. We would require a more detailed analysis of how cyberattacks targeting the energy and telecommunications sectors could affect transport or how an attack on one means of transport could cause a disruption to another means of transport.

text: March 2023

text: ANNEX: MAJOR INCIDENTS

text: Table 1: Aviation

text: Date Proximity Country Incident

text: January 82 Near France Dassault Falcon Jet were hit by the Ragnar Locker ransomware gang .

text: January 83 Far Global A Chinese hacking group stole airline passenger details .

text: March The passenger service system provider SITA was hacked; hundreds of Near Switzerland 84 2021 thousands of Star Alliance passengers’ details were stolen .

text: Malware attack on Radixx Res disrupts 20 airlines’ ticket reservation April 2021 Global Global 85 systems .

text: May 2021 Global Global RevengeRAT and AysncRAT target aerospace and aviation .

text: Air India suffered a data breach, 4.5 million customers impacted, two May 2021 Global India 87 months SITA was hacked .

text: May 2021 Near Cyprus Hacker unsuccessfully tried to attack Larnaca airport server .

text: August The website of the Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil suffered a Far Guatemala 2021 cyberattack.

text: August Bangkok Air confirmed that a passenger information leak had occurred Far Thailand 89 2021 after a ransomware attack .

text: October New APT ChamelGang targeted Russian energy and aviation Far Russia 90 2021 organisation .

text: February 91 Mid Switzerland BlackCat claimed responsibility for an attack on Swissport .

text: February 92 Far Mauritius The computer network of Air Mauritius fell victim to a cyberattack .

text: February An attack on the Polish Medical Air Rescue collapsed virtually all their Near Poland 93 2022 systems .

text: An unidentified group (presumed to be the hacking group Anonymous)

text: March

text: Far Russia carried out an extremely effective attack on the Russian Federal Air 2022 94 Transport Agency .

text: Canadian low-cost airline Sunwing Airlines faced 4 days of extensive flight April 2022 Far Canada 95 delays after the third-party software system was breached by hackers .

text: The website of the Israel Airports Authority was knocked offline due to a April 2022 Mid Israel 96 denial-of-service attack .

text: March 2023

text: Date Proximity Country Incident

text: May 2022 Far India SpiceJet fell victim to a massive ransomware attack .

text: May 2022 Mid Turkey A Turkish airline exposed flight and crew information in 6.5 terabyte leak .

text: A pro-Russia hacker group launched a new attack on the websites of May 2022 Near Italy 99 Italian ministries (Italian airports were targeted) .

text: June 2022 Near Lithuania NoName057 targeted Lithuanian airports with DDoS attacks .

text: August An unprecedented cyberattack hit the state infrastructure of Near Montenegro 101 2022 Montenegro .

text: August Major airline technology provider Accelya was attacked by a ransomware Near Spain 102 2022 group .

text: August 103 Near Portugal TAP Air Portugal fell victim to a Ragnar Locker ransomware attack .

text: September Breached American Airlines email accounts were abused for phishing Far United States 104 2022 purposes .

text: October 105 Near France LockBit 3.0 claimed to have compromised Thales Group .

text: October The websites of major US airports were disrupted due to a large-scale Far United States 106 2022 campaign of DDoS attacks by Killnet .

text: Table 2: Maritime

text: Date Proximity Country Incident

text: February 107 Near France Boat Building Giant Beneteau Says Cyberattack Disrupted Production .

text: March 10 Indian power generation and transmission entities, and two Indian Far India 2021 sea ports were targeted by Chinese hackers amid geopolitical tensions.

text: April 2021 Near France Bourbon confirmed that a cyberattack had occurred .

text: June 2021 Far United States Massachusetts Steamship Authority targeted in a cyberattack .

text: South Korean container line HMM suffered a security breach and a June 2021 Far South Korea 111 cyberattack on its email systems .

text: June 2021 Near Ukraine Automatic identification system signals were spoofed .

text: March 2023

text: Date Proximity Country Incident

text: Four major ports in South Africa (Cape Town, Ngqura, Port Elizabeth and July 2021 Far South Africa Durban) were paralysed following a massive attack on the Transnet National Port Authority .

text: September Port Houston was targeted by a suspected nation-state actor in Far United States 114 2021 cyberattack .

text: September 115 Near Switzerland CGN victim of a cyberattack on its website .

text: September 116 Near France CMA CGM confirmed that a data leak had occurred after a cyberattack .

text: October Microsoft says ‘Iran-Linked’ hackers targeted US, EU and Israeli defence Global World 117 2021 and maritime sectors .

text: November Danaos and Greek shipping companies fell victim to a ransomware Near Greece 118 2021 attack .

text: November Maritime giant Swire Pacific Offshore suffered a data breach following a Mid United Kingdom 119 2021 cyberattack .

text: January Belgium, Germany, 120 Near A cyberattack disrupted northern European oil hubs in major ports . 22 the Netherlands

text: February 121 Far India A ransomware attack hit the Nhava Sheva container terminal .

text: May 2022 Far Iran Israel was linked to a disruptive cyberattack on an Iranian port facility .

text: The Port of London Authority was hit by ‘politically motivated’ May 2022 Mid United Kingdom 123 cyberattack .

text: October Lockbit 3.0 targeted French seaport administrator and economic interest Near France 124 2022 group Dragages-Ports .

text: March 2023

text: Table 3: Railway

text: Date Proximity Country Incident

text: January 125 Far United States A ransomware attack hit the short line rail operator OmniTRAX .

text: March 126 Near Czechia A cyberattack hit railways in Czechia .

text: Suspected Chinese hackers breached the New York City Transit Authority’s April 2021 Far United States 127 computers . United Kingdom rail network Merseyrail likely hit by Lockbit 3.0 May 2021 Mid United Kingdom 128 ransomware .

text: July 2021 Far Iran Hackers breached Iranian rail network, disrupting service .

text: July 2021 Mid United Kingdom Northern’s ticket machines were hit by a ransomware cyberattack .

text: August 131 Near Sweden Skånetrafiken was exposed to a cyber attack .

text: October French transport giant exposed 57 000 employees’ information and source Near France 132 2021 code .

text: November 133 Far Canada After Montreal and Vancouver, Toronto’s subway was also hacked .

text: December The GO Transit website came back online after being down due to a Far Canada 134 2021 worldwide cyber threat (vulnerability) . January 135 Mid Switzerland A hacker flagged a flaw in Switzerland’s national railway system .

text: January Belarusian activists fired ransomware at the country’s state-run railway Mid Belarus 136 22 service .

text: February 137 Near Italy The EAV suffered a cyberattack .

text: March 138 Near Italy Italy’s state railway may have been the target of a cyberattack .

text: Anonymous-linked group GhostSec claimed to have accessed an IT system April 2022 Far Russia 139 of Metrospetstekhnika . Russian hackers temporarily brought down Romanian government websites, April 2022 Near Romania 140 including railway transport operator CFR Calatori . Latvian passenger train company SJSC targeted with DDoS attacks, likely June 2022 Near Latvia 141 by pro-Russian hacktivists .

text: Attackers disrupted the website of the Lithuanian Railways, preventing June 2022 Near Lithuania 142 passengers from purchasing train tickets online .

text: July 2022 Near Denmark Danish regional railway company hit by a ransomware attack .

text: August 144 Near Estonia Estonia was hit by cyberattacks in which Estonia Railways was targeted .

text: October 145 Near Denmark Denmark’s train network was stalled by a cyberattack on a subcontractor .

text: March 2023

text: Table 4: Road

text: Date Proximity Country Incident

text: Toyota Malta warned the public of a WhatsApp scam using its brand April 2021 Near Malta 146 name .

text: June 2021 Far United States Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority was hit by ransomware attack .

text: After their attacks on India’s power assets, Chinese hackers targeted the June 2021 Far India 148 transport sector . Websites of Iran’s Ministry of Roads and Urban Development reportedly July 2021 Far Iran 149 went out of service after another ‘cyber-disruption’ . August 150 Near Sweden Skånetrafiken was exposed to a cyberattack .

text: September Elon Musk’s top-secret ‘full self-driving’ AI car software was leaked to Far United States 151 2021 hackers September 152 Near Netherlands The car company Bochane was hit by a ransomware attack .

text: October French transport giant exposed 57 000 employees’ information and source Near France 153 2021 code . October 154 Near Germany A threat actor leaked the Mercedes-Benz platform’s source code .

text: November Volvo Cars Corporation disclosed that they had been targeted in a Near Sweden 155 2021 cybersecurity breach . December 156 Near Iceland Strætó suffered a cyberattack .

text: December 157 Far United States Kia Motors America was hit by a DoppelPaymer ransomware attack .

text: April 2022 Near Germany Car rental giant Sixt was hit by a cyberattack .

text: May 2022 Far Australia Transport for NSW was struck by a cyberattack .

text: The Massey Ferguson tractor assembly site, AGCO Beauvais, was the May 2022 Near France 160 victim of a cyberattack . Czechia’s Directorate of Roads and Highways was targeted with a DDoS May 2022 Near Czechia 161 attack by Killnet, resulting in web-based services being disrupted . American subsidiary of automotive hose maker Nichirin was hit by a June 2022 Far United States 162 ransomware attack . August Anonymous hacked Yandex Taxi, causing a massive traffic jam in Far Russia 163 2022 Moscow . February For Toyota, the hacking-into of a key supplier’s systems led to a Global World 164. 2022 production halt in 14 of its Japanese plants August 165 Far Indonesia Jasa Marga subsidiary clarified alleged hacking .

text: September 166 Mid United Kingdom The transport company Go-Ahead suffered a cyberattack .

text: March 2023

text: Date Proximity Country Incident

text: September Uber was hacked, its internal systems breached and vulnerability reports Near Global 167 2022 stolen . September 168 Far Russia Transport in Novosibirsk was affected as team Onefist disrupted traffic .

text: October An info-stealer campaign targeted German car dealerships and Near Germany 169 2022 manufacturers .

text: Table 5: Transport sector as a whole (‘All transport’)

text: Date Proximity Country Incident

text: March 170 Far India Chinese hackers targeted the transport sector .

text: September Attackers impersonated the US Department of Transportation in a two-day Far United States 171 2021 phishing scam . Taiwan, December 172 Far Philippines, Hong Chinese hackers were spotted targeting the transport sector .

text: Kong February Advanced persistent threat (APT) activity from hacker group TA2541 Global Global 173 2022 targeted the transport sector globally .

text: August 174 Near Latvia Latvia experiences perhaps the most powerful cyberattack in its history .

text: September Microsoft365 phishing attacks impersonate US government agencies, Far United states 175 2022 including the Department of Transportation .

text: October 176 Near Poland, Ukraine Cyberattacks hit Polish and Ukrainian logistics and transport companies .

text: -N -EN -081 -23 -04 TP ABOUT ENISA The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, ENISA, is the Union’s agency dedicated to achieving a high common level of cybersecurity across Europe. Established in 2004 and strengthened by the EU Cybersecurity Act, the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity contributes to EU cyber policy, enhances the trustworthiness of ICT products, services and processes with cybersecurity certification schemes, cooperates with Member States and EU bodies, and helps Europe prepare for the cyber challenges of tomorrow. Through knowledge sharing, capacity building and awareness raising, the Agency works together with its key stakeholders to strengthen trust in the connected economy, to boost resilience of the Union’s infrastructure and, ultimately, to keep Europe’s society and citizens digitally secure. More information about ENISA and its work can be found here: www.enisa.europa.eu. ISBN 978-92-9204-624-8 doi:10.2824/553997