identifier: Additional Protocol (III) to the Geneva Conventions, 2005

depositary: Switzerland

title: Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III), 8 December 2005

action: signature

country: Ireland

country: Cook Islands

country: Bulgaria

country: Uruguay

country: Haiti

country: Portugal

country: Honduras

country: Slovenia

country: Netherlands

reservation: Declaration by the Kingdom of the Netherlands made upon ratification on 13 December 2006: On 13 December 2006, the Kingdom of the Netherlands deposited with the Swiss Federal Council its instrument of ratification of the Protocol III and declared it applicable to the Kingdom in Europe, to the Netherlands Antilles and to Aruba.

country: Slovakia

reservation: Declaration: "Her Britannic Majesty's Embassy has the honor to declare, on behalf of the Government of the United Kingdom, that its ratification of Protocol III extends to the following territories for whose international relations it is responsible: Anguilla; Bailiwick of Guernsey; Bermuda; British Antarctic Territory; British Indian Ocean Territory; Cayman Islands; Falkland Islands; Isle of Man; Montserrat; Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands; South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands; St Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia; Turks and Caicos Islands; Virgin Islands;"

reservation: Declaration: “Her Britannic Majesty's Embassy has the honor to declare, on behalf of the Government of the United Kingdom, that its ratification of the above Protocols extends to the Bailiwick of Jer sey , in addition to the territories to which they have already been extended . "

country: Republic of Korea

country: Timor-Leste

country: United Republic of Tanzania

country: Türkiye

reservation: At the time of its signature, the Republic of Turkey formulated the following declaration : "Regarding the "Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III)" and taking into consideration the references to the 1977 Additional Protocols I and II therof, the Republic of Turkey declares that it is not party to the Additional Protocols I and II"

country: Uganda

country: Burkina Faso

country: Fiji

country: Ethiopia

country: Colombia

country: Italy

country: Sierra Leone

country: Nicaragua

country: Kazakhstan

country: Guyana

country: United States of America

country: Albania

country: Hungary

reservation: Declaration: Article 6(2) provides inter alia that the High Contracting Parties may permit prior users of the third Protocol emblem, or of any sign constituting an imitation thereof, to continue such use, provided that «the rights to such use were acquired before the adoption of this Protocol». Given that Canadian legislation enacted to implement Protocol III does not have retroactive application and will enter into force on the date of Canada’s ratification of Protocol III, Canada will permit prior users of the third Protocol emblem, or of any sign constituting an imitation thereof, to continue such use, provided that the rights to such use were acquired before the date of Canada’s ratification of Protocol III»

reservation: Declaration made upon ratification: "Until the full re-establishment of the territorial intergrity of the Republic of Moldova, the provisions of the Convention will be applied only on the territory controlled effectively by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova"

reservation: Declaration by the Argentine Republic On 4 August 2011, the Argentine Republic reacted to the declaration made by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on 15 June 2011 as follows (unofficial translation of the original Spanish text): «The Argentine Republic rejects the British claim to extend the application of the Protocol to the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. The Protocol applies to the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands as being an integral part of the territory of the Argentine Republic, by virtue of the ratification of the Protocol by the Argentine Government on 16 March 2011. In relation to the question of the Falkland Islands, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the resolutions 2065 (XX), 3160 (XXVIII), 31/49, 37/9, 38/12, 39/6, 40/21, 41/40, 42/19 and 43/25, recognizing the existence of a dispute over sovereignty and requesting the Argentine Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to re-initiate negotiations with a view to finding the means to resolve peacefully and definitively the dispute, with the good offices of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who will inform the General Assembly on the progress made. The United Nations Special Committee on decolonization has repeatedly expressed the same view, most recently in the resolutions adopted on 24 June 2010 and 21 June 2011. Likewise, the General Assembly of the Organization of American States has adopted, on 8 June 2010 and on 7 June 2011, new declarations on the question in similar terms. The Argentine Republic reaffirms its right of sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime space.»

reservation: Declaration by the State of Israel made upon ratification on 22 November 2007: On 22 November 2007, Israel deposited with the Swiss Federal Council its instrument of ratification of the Protocol III. The instrument contains the following text (original English version): «The Government of Israel declares that while respecting the inviolability of the additional distinctive emblem provided for in the “Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III)”, it is the understanding of the Government of Israel that the ratification or the implementation of this protocol does not affect any rights acquired pursuant to reservations made by Israel to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949».

reservation: Declaration by the State of Israel made on 5 November 2008: On 5 November 2008, the State of Israel deposited with the Swiss Federal Council the following declaration referring to the text contained in the instrument of ratification of the Protocol III deposited by the State of Israel on 22 November 2007 (notification GEN 3/07 of 26 November 2007) (original English version): «The Embassy of the State of Israel presents its compliments to the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs and has the honour to refer to the declaration made by Israel upon ratification of the Third Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions. In response to questions raised in relation to this declaration, the State of Israel wishes to confirm that this declaration is not intended to enable Israel to derogate from any of the provisions of the Protocol. It also recognizes that under the terms of the Protocol, the Red Crystal, when used as a protective emblem, may not incorporate any additional emblems or combine them as part of the protective emblem.» Communication by Switzerland made on 7 November 2008: In its capacity as depositary of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols, the Swiss Federal Council has the honour to inform the States Parties that Switzerland, as a State Party, replied, on 7 November 2008, to the State of Israel concerning its declaration made on 5 November 2008 as follows (original English version): «The Federal Department of Foreign Affairs presents its compliments to the Embassy of the State of Israel and acknowledges receipt of the Embassy’s note verbale dated 3.11.08 by which the Government of the State of Israel clarifies its declaration made at the ratification, on 22 November 2007, of the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III). The Federal Department thanks the Embassy for this note which makes it clear that the State of Israel respects the Protocol III in its entirety and will therefore solely use the Additional Emblem (Red Crystal) as the distinctive emblem in accordance with said Protocol.» Communication by Sweden made on 26 November 2008: On 26 November 2008, the depositary received from Sweden the following communication (original English version): «The Government of Sweden has closely examined the declaration made by the Government of Israel on 22 November 2007, when ratifying the Protocol Additional III to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, with subsequent clarification in its declaration on 5 November 2008 as well as the following communication made by [Switzerland] on 7 November 2008. In the light of these communications it is the understanding of Sweden that Israel will adhere to the Protocol in its entirety and solely use the Red Crystal as its distinctive emblem. It is the expectation of Sweden that all states, in accordance with the object and purpose of Protocol III, join in the effort to disseminate the knowledge of the Protocol and to strengthen the respect of the new additional emblem».

reservation: Communication: On 5 October 2010, the Kingdom of the Netherlands informed the Depositary about a modification in the structure of the Kingdom and, on 8 September 2011, transmitted a detailed status report about the application of the treaties deposited with the Swiss Federal Council. Following this modification, the Protocol III is applicable to the Netherlands as follows: to the European part as from 13 June 2007, to the Caribbean part (the islands of Bonaire, Sint Eustasius and Saba) as from 10 October 2010, to Aruba as from 13 June 2007 and to Curaçao and Sint Maarten as from 10 October 2010; it also applied to the former Netherlands Antilles between 13 June 2007 and 9 October 2010.

text: Geneva Conventions

text: Geneva Conventions, article 1

text: Geneva Conventions, article 2

text: First Geneva Convention, article 26

text: First Geneva Convention, article 38

text: First Geneva Convention, article 42

text: First Geneva Convention, article 44

text: Geneva Conventions

text: Geneva Conventions, article 1

text: Geneva Conventions, article 2

text: Geneva Conventions

text: Geneva Conventions, article 1

text: Geneva Conventions, article 2

text: Geneva Conventions

text: Geneva Conventions, article 1

text: Geneva Conventions, article 2

text: Additional Protocols

text: Additional Protocol I, article 18

text: Additional Protocol I, article 38

text: Additional Protocols

text: Additional Protocol II, article 12

text: Title of the Protocol

text: [ Link ]

text: The High Contracting Parties,

text: (PP1) Reaffirming the provisions of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (in particular

text: Articles 26

text: and

text: of the

text: First Geneva Convention

text: ) and, where applicable, their Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 (in particular

text: Articles 18

text: and

text: of

text: Additional Protocol I

text: and

text: Article 12

text: of

text: Additional Protocol II

text: ), concerning the use of distinctive emblems,

text: (PP2) Desiring to supplement the aforementioned provisions so as to enhance their protective value and universal character,

text: (PP3) Noting that this Protocol is without prejudice to the recognized right of High Contracting Parties to continue to use the emblems they are using in conformity with their obligations under the Geneva Conventions and, where applicable, the Protocols additional thereto,

text: (PP4) Recalling that the obligation to respect persons and objects protected by the Geneva Conventions and the Protocols additional thereto derives from their protected status under international law and is not dependent on use of the distinctive emblems, signs or signals,

text: (PP5) Stressing that the distinctive emblems are not intended to have any religious, ethnic, racial, regional or political significance,

text: (PP6) Emphasizing the importance of ensuring full respect for the obligations relating to the distinctive emblems recognized in the Geneva Conventions, and, where applicable, the Protocols additional thereto,

text: (PP7) Recalling that

text: Article 44

text: of the

text: First Geneva Convention

text: makes the distinction between the protective use and the indicative use of the distinctive emblems,

text: (PP8) Recalling further that National Societies undertaking activities on the territory of another State must ensure that the emblems they intend to use within the framework of such activities may be used in the country where the activity takes place and in the country or countries of transit,

text: (PP9) Recognizing the difficulties that certain States and National Societies may have with the use of the existing distinctive emblems,

text: (PP10) Noting the determination of the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to retain their current names and emblems,

text: Have agreed on the following:

text: Preamble

text: 1.The High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for this Protocol in all circumstances.

text: 2. This Protocol reaffirms and supplements the provisions of the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 ("the Geneva Conventions") and, where applicable, of their two Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 ("the 1977 Additional Protocols") relating to the distinctive emblems, namely the red cross, the red crescent and the red lion and sun, and shall apply in the same situations as those referred to in these provisions.

text: Article 1 - Respect for and scope of application of this Protocol

text: 1.This Protocol recognizes an additional distinctive emblem in addition to, and for the same purposes as, the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions. The distinctive emblems shall enjoy equal status.

text: 2. This additional distinctive emblem, composed of a red frame in the shape of a square on edge on a white ground, shall conform to the illustration in the Annex to this Protocol. This distinctive emblem is referred to in this Protocol as the "third Protocol emblem".

text: 3. The conditions for use of and respect for the third Protocol emblem are identical to those for the distinctive emblems established by the Geneva Conventions and, where applicable, the 1977 Additional Protocols.

text: 4. The medical services and religious personnel of armed forces of High Contracting Parties may, without prejudice to their current emblems, make temporary use of any distinctive emblem referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article where this may enhance protection.

text: Article 2 - Distinctive emblems

text: 1. National Societies of those High Contracting Parties which decide to use the third Protocol emblem may, in using the emblem in conformity with relevant national legislation, choose to incorporate within it, for indicative purposes:

text: a) a distinctive emblem recognized by the Geneva Conventions or a combination of these emblems; or b) another emblem which has been in effective use by a High Contracting Party and was the subject of a communication to the other High Contracting Parties and the International Committee of the Red Cross through the depositary prior to the adoption of this Protocol.

text: Incorporation shall conform to the illustration in the Annex to this Protocol.

text: 2. A National Society which chooses to incorporate within the third Protocol emblem another emblem in accordance with paragraph 1 above, may, in conformity with national legislation, use the designation of that emblem and display it within its national territory.

text: 3. National Societies may, in accordance with national legislation and in exceptional circumstances and to facilitate their work, make temporary use of the distinctive emblem referred to in Article 2 of this Protocol.

text: 4. This Article does not affect the legal status of the distinctive emblems recognized in the Geneva Conventions and in this Protocol, nor does it affect the legal status of any particular emblem when incorporated for indicative purposes in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article.

text: Article 3 - Indicative use of the third Protocol emblem

text: The International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, and their duly authorized personnel, may use, in exceptional circumstances and to facilitate their work, the distinctive emblem referred to in Article 2 of this Protocol.

text: Article 4 - International Committee of the Red Cross and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies

text: The medical services and religious personnel participating in operations under the auspices of the United Nations may, with the agreement of participating States, use one of the distinctive emblems mentioned in Articles 1 and 2 .

text: Article 5 - Missions under United Nations auspices

text: 1.The provisions of the Geneva Conventions and, where applicable, the 1977 Additional Protocols, governing prevention and repression of misuse of the distinctive emblems shall apply equally to the third Protocol emblem. In particular, the High Contracting Parties shall take measures necessary for the prevention and repression, at all times, of any misuse of the distinctive emblems mentioned in Articles 1 and 2 and their designations, including the perfidious use and the use of any sign or designation constituting an imitation thereof.

text: 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1 above, High Contracting Parties may permit prior users of the third Protocol emblem, or of any sign constituting an imitation thereof, to continue such use, provided that the said use shall not be such as would appear, in time of armed conflict, to confer the protection of the Geneva Conventions and, where applicable, the 1977 Additional Protocols, and provided that the rights to such use were acquired before the adoption of this Protocol.

text: Article 6 - Prevention and repression of misuse

text: The High Contracting Parties undertake, in time of peace as in time of armed conflict, to disseminate this Protocol as widely as possible in their respective countries and, in particular, to include the study thereof in their programmes of military instruction and to encourage the study thereof by the civilian population, so that this instrument may become known to the armed forces and to the civilian population.

text: Article 7 - Dissemination

text: This Protocol shall be open for signature by the Parties to the Geneva Conventions on the day of its adoption and will remain open for a period of twelve months.

text: Article 8 - Signature

text: This Protocol shall be ratified as soon as possible. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Swiss Federal Council, depositary of the Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols.

text: Article 9 - Ratification

text: This Protocol shall be open for accession by any Party to the Geneva Conventions which has not signed it. The instruments of accession shall be deposited with the depositary.

text: Article 10 - Accession

text: 1. This Protocol shall enter into force six months after two instruments of ratification or accession have been deposited.

text: 2. For each Party to the Geneva Conventions thereafter ratifying or acceding to this Protocol, it shall enter into force six months after the deposit by such Party of its instrument of ratification or accession.

text: Article 11 - Entry into force

text: 1. When the Parties to the Geneva Conventions are also Parties to this Protocol, the Conventions shall apply as supplemented by this Protocol.

text: 2. When one of the Parties to the conflict is not bound by this Protocol, the Parties to the Protocol shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by this Protocol in relation to each of the Parties which are not bound by it, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.

text: Article 12 - Treaty relations upon entry into force of this Protocol

text: 1. Any High Contracting Party may propose amendments to this Protocol. The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to the depositary, which shall decide, after consultation with all the High Contracting Parties, the International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, whether a conference should be convened to consider the proposed amendment.

text: 2. The depositary shall invite to that conference all the High Contracting Parties as well as the Parties to the Geneva Conventions, whether or not they are signatories of this Protocol

text: Article 13 - Amendment

text: 1. In case a High Contracting Party should denounce this Protocol, the denunciation shall only take effect one year after receipt of the instrument of denunciation. If, however, on the expiry of that year the denouncing Party is engaged in a situation of armed conflict or occupation, the denunciation shall not take effect before the end of the armed conflict or occupation.

text: 2. The denunciation shall be notified in writing to the depositary, which shall transmit it to all the High Contracting Parties.

text: 3. The denunciation shall have effect only in respect of the denouncing Party.

text: 4. Any denunciation under paragraph 1 shall not affect the obligations already incurred, by reason of the armed conflict or occupation, under this Protocol by such denouncing Party in respect of any act committed before this denunciation becomes effective.

text: Article 14 - Denunciation

text: The depositary shall inform the High Contracting Parties as well as the Parties to the Geneva Conventions, whether or not they are signatories of this Protocol, of:

text: a) signatures affixed to this Protocol and the deposit of instruments of ratification and accession under Articles 8 , 9 and 10 ;

text: b) the date of entry into force of this Protocol under Article 11 within ten days of said entry into force;

text: c) communications received under Article 13 ;

text: d) denunciations under Article 14 .

text: Article 15 - Notifications

text: 1. After its entry into force, this Protocol shall be transmitted by the depositary to the Secretariat of the United Nations for registration and publication, in accordance with Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.

text: 2. The depositary shall also inform the Secretariat of the United Nations of all ratifications, accessions and denunciations received by it with respect to this Protocol.

text: Article 16 - Registration

text: The original of this Protocol, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the depositary, which shall transmit certified true copies thereof to all the Parties to the Geneva Conventions.

text: Article 17 - Authentic texts

text: Annex

summary: Since the nineteenth century the red cross and red crescent emblems have been used as universal symbols of assistance for armed conflict victims. With the adoption of an additional emblem – the red crystal – a new chapter in their long history has just been written. The original Geneva Convention, adopted on 22 August 1864, established the red cross emblem. From the beginning, the emblem was a visible sign of the neutral status and the protection granted by international humanitarian law to armed forces’ medical services and volunteers belonging to relief societies for wounded military personnel. At the time, the adoption of a single distinctive symbol appeared to be an essential condition for this protection. By the end of the nineteenth century, however, the red crescent and the red lion and sun [1] were used by some States and relief societies instead of the red cross. Taking note of the fait accompli, the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armies in the Field of 27 July 1929 granted international recognition to these two additional emblems. The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 subsequently confirmed all three emblems. The Commentary on Article 38 of the First Geneva Convention of 1949 clearly states that these emblems are intended “to signify one thing only – something which is, however, of immense importance: respect for the individual who suffers and is defenceless, who must be aided, whether friend or enemy, without distinction of nationality, race, religion, class or opinion.” [2] Despite this assertion, the emblems are sometimes perceived in particular contexts as having a religious or political connotation. This perception is the cause of two major difficulties for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. First, it challenges the notion that neutrality and impartiality serve as the basis for the activities of all components of the Movement. As a consequence, the emblems are not given the respect they are due, which diminishes the protection afforded those displaying them. Second, it has led some States and relief societies to refuse to adopt any of the existing emblems on the grounds that none is suitable for them. Any such refusal prevents the Movement from attaining true universality, since its statutes lay down the use of one or the other of these symbols as a necessary condition for a National Society to be recognized and to become a full member of the Movement. In order to correct these two problems, the States party to the Geneva Conventions adopted a third protocol additional to the Conventions at a diplomatic conference held in Geneva from 5 to 8 December 2005. This instrument recognizes an additional emblem – composed of a red frame in the shape of a square on edge on a white ground – commonly referred to as the red crystal.[3] The shape and name of this additional emblem were the result of a long selection process, the goal of which was to come up with a result devoid of any political, religious or other connotation and which could thus be used all over the world. The red crystal is not intended to replace the cross and crescent but to provide a further option. The persons and entities authorized to display the red crystal are the same as those entitled to use the emblems recognized by the Geneva Conventions of 1949. These include in particular the medical services of the armed forces of States, civilian hospitals with explicit authorization and the various components of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement – namely, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the National Societies, and their International Federation. The recognized emblems are equivalent in meaning. They must be treated equally and receive equal protection in the national legislation of States. The emblems may be employed in two different ways. As a protective device, an emblem is the visible sign of protection conferred by the Geneva Conventions. As an indicative device, an emblem shows that a person or object is linked to the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Additional Protocol III provides for the red crystal in its pure form to be used as a protective device. If used as an indicative device, however, the red crystal may have incorporated within it one of the emblems recognized by the Geneva Conventions, a combination of these emblems or another emblem which has been in effective use by a State party to Additional Protocol III and was the subject of a communication to the other States Parties and the ICRC prior to the adoption of the Protocol. It is important to note that Additional Protocol III authorizes not only the permanent substitution of the red crystal for the red cross or red crescent as described above, but also temporary use of the red crystal in exceptional circumstances to enhance protection of armed forces’ medical services or to facilitate the work of National Societies. Additional Protocol III is drawn up in such a way as to prevent any future proliferation of other emblems. Notes 1. The Islamic Republic of Iran – the only State to have employed the red lion and sun – has since abandoned its use. 2. Commentary on Article 38 of the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 1952, p. 305. 3. Protocol Additional III refers to this additional emblem as the “third Protocol emblem.” However, paragraph 14 of the final act of the diplomatic conference on the adoption of Protocol III specifies in this regard: “Although Protocol III referred to the additional emblem as the ‘third Protocol emblem,’ the ICRC and the [International Federation] informed the Conference that the designation ‘red crystal’ had gained currency and would be introduced formally at the next International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent.”