JUDGMENT OF 1.7.1964 — CASE 26/63 PISTOJ v COMMISSION

In Case 26/63

THE COURT (Second Chamber) composed of: Ch. L. Hammes, President, R. Rossi and R. Lecourt (Rapporteur), Judges, Advocate-General: K. Roemer Registrar: A Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

General

A — Grounds of complaint concerning the annulment of the integration procedure followed in respect of the applicant

B — Grounds of complaint concerning the application for compensation

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

A — The naming of the defendants as parties

B — Application for annulment

Admissibility

As to the substance of the case

Infringement of Article 110 of the Staff Regulations

Infringement of the last sentence of Article 5 of the Staff Regulations

Infringement of the rights of the defence and the general principles of law

Animosity of an immediate superior

Infringement of Article 102 of the Staff Regulations

Infringement of Article 25 of the Staff Regulations

Incorrect finding or incorrect assessment of the facts

Presence of Vice-President Caron during the integration procedure

Insufficient time for acceptance of a lower position

C— Application for damages

Costs