JUDGMENT OF 7.7.1964 — CASE 87/63 GEORGES v COMMISSION

In Case 87/63

THE COURT (First Chamber) composed of: A. Trabucchi, President of Chamber, L. Delvaux (Rapporteur) and W. Strauß, Judges, Advocate-General: M. Lagrange Registrar: H.J. Eversen, Assistant Registrar

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

A — The applicant claims in her application that the Court should:

alternatively,

In the further alternative,

In her statement in reply:

B — The defendant contends:

—— In its statement of defence that the Court should:

—— In its rejoinder, that tne Court should:

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

A — As to admissibility

B — On the substance of the case

1. As to the first ground of complaint: irregularity of the establishment procedure

2. As to the second ground of complaint: inaccuracy or irrelevance of the reasons

3. As to the third ground of complaint: irregularity of fhe length of notice

4. Concerning the claim for compensation

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

I — As to admissibility

II — On the substance of the case

A — Concerning the ground of complaint based upon the irregularity of the integration procedure

B — Concerning the ground of complaint based on the inaccuracy and lack of relevance of the reasons

C — Concerning the request for compensation

III — Costs