JUDGMENT OF 7.7.1964 — CASE 93/63 MINOT v COMMISSION

In Case 93/63

THE COURT (First Chamber) composed of: A. Trabucchi, President of Chamber, L. Delvaux (Rapporteur) and W. Strauß, Judges, Advocate-General: M. Lagrange Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

A — As to admissibility

As to 1

As to 2

As to 3

As to 4

B — On the substance of the case

1. The defendant's alleged wrongful act or omission in not having granted to the applicant the grade and remuneration appropriate to her duties

2. The refusal of integration and the consequent dismissal

(a) The procedure followed for integration

(b) The reason for the refusal of integration and for the dismissal

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

I — Admissibility

II — On the substance of the case

A — The ground of complaint relating to the irregularity of the integration procedure

B — The ground of complaint in respect of the reasons for refusal of establishment and for dismissal

C — The claim for compensation

1. The performance by the applicant of duties higher than those of her grade and salary

2. The damage suffered from the decision against integration and of dismissal

3. Inadequacy of notice

III — Costs