JUDGMENT OF 21. 1. 1965—CASE 108/63 MERLINI v HIGH AUTHORITY

In Case 108/63

THE COURT composed of: Ch. L. Hammes, President, A. M. Donner (Rapporteur) and R. Lecourt, Presidents of Chambers, L. Delvaux and A. Trabucchi, Judges, Advocate-General: K. Roemer Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Statement of facts

II— Conclusions of the parties The applicant claims that the Court should:

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

On admissibility

On the substance of the case

A — Infringement of the rules of law arising from national laws

B — Failure to state reasons

C — Preclusion of the right to claim new debts for the period in question

D — Misuse of powers

1. Error in the assessment of the quantities of assessable ferrous scrap

2. Error in fixing the equalization rate applicable

IV— Procedure

Grounds of judgment

The admissibility of the application

On the submissions

1. Infringement of rules of law derived from national laws

2. Failure to state reasons

3. Preclusion of the right to present fresh claims in accordance with the new findings

4. Misuse of powers

Costs

1 Translator's Note: Article 20 appears to be meant.