JUDGMENT OF 31. 3. 1965—CASE 23/64 VANDEVYVERE v PARLIAMENT

In Case 23/64

THE COURT (Second Chamber) composed of: A. M. Donner, President of Chamber, W. Strauß (Rapporteur) and R. Monaco (Judges), Advocate-General: M. Lagrange Registrar: A.Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

1. Admissibility

A — Is Article 91 of the Staff Regulations applicable to candidates for entry to the service of the Communities?

B — Inadequacy of submissions

C — The inadmissible nature of the reservation allowing fresh issues to be raised in the course of proceedings; the requirement for the applicant to limit her action to acts adversely affecting her

2. On the substance of the case

A — Infringement of Articles 110 of the EEC and EAEC Staff Regulations and of 107 of the ECSC Staff Regulations

B — Lack of statement of reasons

C — Errors of fact

3. Production of documents

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

I — Concerning the object of the proceedings

II — As to the admissibility of the application

III — On the substance of the case

1. The first submission

2. The second submission

3. The third submission

4. Concerning the preparatory inquiry requested by the applicant

IV — Costs