JUDGMENT OF 1. 4. 1965 — CASE 38/64 GETREIDE—IMPORT v COMMISSION

In Case 38/64

THE COURT composed of: Ch. L. Hammes, President, A. M. Donner (Rapporteur) and R. Lecourt, Presidents of Chambers, L. Delvaux, A. Trabucchi, W. Strauß and R. Monaco, Judges, Advocate-General: J. Gand Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties on admissibility

IV— Procedure

Grounds of judgment

The admissibility of the application

Costs

I —. Facts

II —. Conclusions of the parties

III —. Submissions and arguments of the parties on admissibility

1. In analysing the nature of the Decisions determining c.i.f. prices, the defendant makes the following statements:

2. A reply to the question whether the Decision is of individual concern to the applicant depends basically on its legal repercussions. It is therefore necessary to decide who is concerned by the c.i.f. price.

IV—. Procedure

On those grounds, Upon reading the pleadings; Upon hearing the report of the Judge-Rapporteur; Upon hearing the parties; Upon hearing the opinion of the Advocate-General; Having regard to the second paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community; Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community; Having regard to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, especially Article 69 (2); THE COURT hereby orders:

I Dismisses Application 38/64 as inadmissible;

2 Orders the applicant to pay the costs of the action.