JUDGMENT OF 2. 3. 1967 — JOINED CASES 25 AND 26/65 SIMET AND FERAM v HIGH AUTHORITY

In Joined Cases

THE COURT composed of: Ch. L. Hammes, President (Rapporteur), A Trabucchi, President of Chamber, A. M. Dormer, R. Lecourt and W. Strauß, Judges, Advocate-General: J. Gand Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

1. Case 25/65 (Simet)

2. Case 26/65 (Feram)

II — Conclusions of the parties

III — Procedure

IV — Submissions and arguments of the parties

A — Admissibility

1. The inadmissibility of both applications on the ground of their being out of time

2. Inadmissibility of Application 25/65 (Simet) on the ground of disparity between the submissions and the subject-matter of the dispute

3. Inadmissibility of the submissions directed against general Decision No 7/63

B — The substance of the case

1. The individual decisions

Case 25/65 (Simet)

Case 26/65 (Feram)

2. General Decision No 7/63

Grounds of judgment

I — Admissibility

1. The objection that the applications are out of time

2. The objection based on the discrepancy between the submissions and the subject-matter of Application 25/26 (Simet)

3. The objection relating to the submissions directed against general Decision No 7/63

II — The substance

The justification for resorting to an estimated assessment

III — Costs