JUDGMENT OF 16. 6. 1966 — CASE 54/65 FORGES DE CHATILLON v HIGH AUTHORITY

In Case 54/65

THE COURT composed of: Ch. L. Hammes, President, L. Delvaux and W. Strauß (Rapporteur), Presidents of Chambers, A. M. Donner, A. Trabucchi, R. Lecourt and R. Monaco, Judges, Advocate-General: J. Gand Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

1. The application for annulment

A — First submission: Infringement of Article 53 (b) of the ECSC Treaty and the general decisions of the High Authority governing the equalization scheme for imported ferrous scrap

(a) Does the material in question constitute ferrous scrap?

(b) Does the price of the material in question depend directly on that of ordinary scrap?

B — Second submission: Infringement of Article 15 of the ECSC Treaty

C — Third submission: Infringement of Article 4 (b) of the ECSC Treaty

D — Fourth submission: Infringement of the rules applicable to the revocation of administrative measures

2. The claim for damages

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

I — The application for annulment

First submission: Infringement of Article 53 (b) of the ECSC Treaty and of the general decisions of the High Authority governing the equalization scheme for imported ferrous scrap

Second submission: Infringement of Article 15 of the ECSC Treaty

Third submission: Infringement of Article 4 (b) of the ECSC Treaty

Fourth submission: Infringement of the general principles of law applying to the revocation of administrative measures

II — The claim for damages

III — Costs