JUDGMENT OF 22. 6. 1967 — CASE 12/66 WILLAME v COMMISSION

In Case 12/66

THE COURT (First Chamber) composed of: A. Trabucchi, President of Chamber, L. Delvaux (Rapporteur) and W. Strauß, Judges, Advocate-General: K. Roemer Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

A — In his application, the applicant has claimed that the Court should:

Primarily

Secondarily

B — In its statement of defence, the defendant has contended that the Court should:

C — In his reply, the applicant has claimed that the Court should:

D — In its rejoinder, the defendant has contended that the Court should:

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

A — Admissibility

B — Substance

1. First submission: irregularity of the integration procedure

2. Second submission: defects in the statement of reasons for the decision

3. Third submission: misuse of powers

4. Fourth submission: wrongful acts and omissions

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

I — Admissibility

II — Substance

A — The application for annulment

1. The first submission: irregularity of the integration procedure

2. The second submission: absence or insufficiency of grounds for the decision

3. The third submission: misuse of powers

B — The claim for damages

III — Costs