JUDGMENT OF 12. 12. 1967 — CASE 15/67 BAUER v COMMISSION

In Case 15/67

THE COURT (First Chamber) composed of: A. M. Donner, President of Chamber, R. Monaco (Rapporteur) and J. Mertens de Wilmars, Judges, Advocate-General: J. Gand Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Issues of fact and of law

I — Summary of the facts

II — Conclusions of the parties

A — In his application the applicant claims that the Court should:

B — In its statement of defence the defendant contends that the Court should:

III — Submissions and arguments of the parties

Admissibility

Substance

IV — Procedure

Grounds of judgment

Costs

I —. Summary of the facts

II —. Conclusions of the parties

A —. In his application the applicant claims that the Court should:

B —. In its statement of defence the defendant contends that the Court should:

III —. Submissions and arguments of the parties

IV —. Procedure

On those grounds, Upon reading the pleadings; Upon hearing the report of the Judge-Rapporteur; Upon hearing the parties; Upon hearing the opinion of the Advocate-General; Having regard to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Coal and Steel Community, especially Articles 43 and 45; Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Coal and Steel Community; Having regard to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, especially Articles 69 and 70, THE COURT (First Chamber) hereby:

1 Declares that there is no occasion to proceed to judgment on the conclusions contained in the application;

2 Rejects the conclusions contained in the reply as inadmissible;

3 Orders the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings prior to the lodgment of the reply;

4 Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred from the lodgment of the reply, including those incurred by the defendant.