Opinion of Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered on 26 September 1989

1 Original language: Italian.

2 OJ L 168,1.7.1988, p.111.

3 OJ L 171, 28.6.1978, p. 1.

4 OJ L 179, 1.7.1978, p. 10.

5 OJ L 210, 1 8.1987, p. 63.

6 See most recently the judgments of 29 June 1989 in Joined Cases 250/86 and 11/87 RAR [1989] ECR 2045, paragraphs 6 to 9 and also of 24 February 1987 in Case 26/86 Deutz und Geldermann [1987] ECR 941, paragraphs 6 to 9 and of 6 October 1982 in Case 307/81 Alusuisse [1982] ECR 3463, paragraphs 7, 8 and 11.

7 Judgment of 13 May 1971 in Joined Cases 41 to 44/70 [1971] ECR 411.

8 Judgment of 18 November 1975 in Casc 100/74 CAM [1975] ECR 1393

9 Judgment of 3 May 1978 in Case 112/77 Tapfer [1978] ECR 1021.

10 A. Barav and G. Vandersanden Contentieux communautaire, Bruylanl, Drusseis, 1977, p 172.

11 M. Waelbroeck: Rev. int. jur. belge, 1971, p. 533 (emphasis added).

12 OJ L 168, 1.7.1988, p. 73.

13 Judgment of 25 March 1982 in Case 45/81 Moksel [1982] ECR1129.