Beslut 1992 261

no. 15243/89: A. v. the Netherlands
no. 19186/91: A. v. the United Kingdom
no. 20657/92: A.M. v. the United Kingdom
no. 14807/89: Agrotexim Hellas S.A., Biotex S.A., Hymofix Hellas S.A., Kykladiki S.A., Mepex S.A. and Texema S.A. v. Greece
no. 14852/89: Akhtar, Johangir and Johangir v. the Netherlands
no. 18418/91: Altinkaya v. Sweden
no. 13906/88: Anderberg v. Sweden
no. 14740/89: Andersson and 28 Others v. Sweden
no. 14477/88: B. v. AUSTRIA
no. 15154/89: B. v. AUSTRIA
no. 19070/91: B. v. GERMANY
no. 14219/88: B. v. GERMANY
no. 16878/90: B. v. SWEDEN
no. 15606/89: B. v. the Netherlands
no. 16791/90: B. v. the United Kingdom
no. 18711/91: B. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19476/92: B. v. the United Kingdom
no. 18350/91: B.F. v. Austria
no. 19345/92: B.H. v. Austria
no. 15672/89: B.v. the Netherlands
no. 17504/90: Babul v. the United Kingdom
no. 16487/90: Batt v. Austria
no. 18275/91: Bazurto Mendoza v. Sweden
no. 18643/91: Benes v. Austria
no. 18431/91: Bernstorff v. Germany
no. 19628/92: Bibi v. the United Kingdom
no. 17741/91: Bish v. the Netherlands
no. 17829/91: Boeck v. Denmark
no. 16580/90: Boyle v. the United Kingdom
no. 18869/91: Bracht v. Germany
no. 15435/89: Britting v. the Netherlands
no. 15198/89: Buchinger v. Austria
no. 18077/91: Buitrago Montes and Perez Lopez v. the United Kingdom
no. 16213/90: Burghartz and Schnyder Burghartz v. Switzerland
no. 13156/87: Byrn v. Denmark
no. 16155/90: C. v. CYPRUS
no. 15643/89: C. v. the Netherlands
no. 19139/91: C. v. the Netherlands
no. 14247/88: C. v. the United Kingdom
no. 18713/91: C. v. the United Kingdom
no. 17443/90: C.B. and A.M. v. Switzerland
no. 16247/90: C.C. v. Switzerland
no. 18535/91: C.K., A.Z. and S.M. v. the Netherlands
no. 13903/88: Claesson and Others v. Sweden
no. 16410/90: D. v. AUSTRIA
no. 19368/92: D. v. AUSTRIA
no. 16151/90: D.C., D.S. and L.A. v. Austria
no. 20202/92: D.F. v. Finland
no. 18757/91: D.M. v. the United Kingdom
no. 17175/90: D.S. v. the Netherlands
no. 17546/90: Daldal-Uslu v. the Netherlands
no. 14502/89: Dankers v. the Netherlands
no. 19969/92: Dax v. Germany
no. 16690/90: De Vries v. the Netherlands
no. 20608/92: DeBONO v. MALTA
no. 15268/89: Doran v. the Netherlands
no. 17391/90: E. v. NORWAY
no. 18242/91: E. v. Switzerland
no. 14501/89: E.A. and A.A. v. the Netherlands
no. 18889/91: E.E. v. Germany
no. 16568/90: E.F. and S.F. v. Austria
no. 17771/91: E.R. v. Switzerland
no. 15946/90: Elainouni and Laamrani v. the Netherlands
no. 16702/90: Eriksson v. Sweden
no. 18243/91: F. v. Switzerland
no. 15642/89: F.B., A.B. and Association X. v. the Netherlands
no. 18825/91: F.P. v. Germany
no. 20118/92: F.P. v. the United Kingdom
no. 17101/90: Fayed and House of Fraser Holdings Plc. v. the United Kingdom
no. 20591/92: Firsoff v. the United Kingdom
no. 16922/90: Fischer v. Austria
no. 18928/91: Fredin v. Sweden
no. 14017/88: Fridh and Cifond Aktiebolag v. Sweden
no. 15853/89: G. v. AUSTRIA
no. 18248/91: G. v. AUSTRIA
no. 15927/89: G. v. the Netherlands
no. 17531/90: G. v. the United Kingdom
no. 20435/92: G. v. the United Kingdom
no. 14923/89: G.S. v. Austria
no. 15375/89: Gasus Dosier- Und Fördertechnik Gmbh v. the Netherlands
no. 16243/90: Goraniya v. the United Kingdom
no. 16792/90: Grafström v. Sweden
no. 13882/88: Gritschneder v. Germany
no. 14968/89: H. v. AUSTRIA
no. 16588/90: H. v. AUSTRIA
no. 17004/90: H. v. NORWAY
no. 15260/89: H. v. SWEDEN
no. 13536/88: H. v. the Netherlands
no. 17366/90: H. v. the United Kingdom
no. 17839/91: H.A. and M.A. v. Switzerland
no. 19098/91: H.B. v. Austria
no. 18394/91: H.K. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19205/91: H.N. v. Austria
no. 21028/92: H.N. v. Czechoslovakia
no. 19084/91: Hagemann v. the Netherlands
no. 18287/91: Harrauer v. Austria
no. 20165/92: Helmers v. Sweden
no. 16215/90: Hess v. Switzerland
no. 18881/91: Hoffunktionærforeningen I Danmark v. Denmark
no. 14191/88: Holm v. Sweden
no. 19462/92: Hummels v. the Netherlands
no. 17789/91: I. v. GERMANY
no. 13914/88: Informationsverein Lentia ; Haider ; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Offenes ; Weber ; Radio Melody Ges.M.B.H. v. Austria
no. 16131/90: Insam v. Austria
no. 14459/88: J. v. SWEDEN
no. 17668/91: J. v. SWEDEN
no. 13713/88: J., F., H. and W. v. AUSTRIA
no. 17917/91: J.P.C. v. Austria
no. 15890/89: Jersild v. Denmark
no. 14006/88: Johansson v. Sweden
no. 14444/88: Johansson v. Sweden
no. 14623/89: K. Kg. v. Austria
no. 16002/90: K. v. AUSTRIA
no. 18809/91: K. v. AUSTRIA
no. 17380/90: K. v. AUSTRIA
no. 20079/92: K. v. Czechoslovakia
no. 20470/92: K. v. SWEDEN
no. 15928/89: K. v. the Netherlands
no. 16304/90: K., S. and H. v. the Netherlands
no. 20580/92: K.B. v. Germany
no. 16969/90: Keegan v. Ireland
no. 17711/91: Kelly v. the United Kingdom
no. 15666/89: Kerkhoven and Hinke v. the Netherlands
no. 16514/90: Kritsch v. Austria
no. 14846/89: Kronenburg v. the Netherlands
no. 17770/91: Kögl v. Austria
no. 17495/90: Kübli v. Switzerland
no. 18417/91: Kücükaslan v. Sweden
no. 18288/91: L. and S. v. Sweden
no. 14773/89: L. v. GERMANY
no. 16648/90: L. v. NORWAY
no. 16935/90: L. v. SWEDEN
no. 17486/90: L. v. the Netherlands
no. 15225/89: L.F. v. Austria
no. 19319/92: L.O. v. Royaume-Uni
no. 18624/91: Lagler v. Austria
no. 14861/89: Lala v. the Netherlands
no. 16152/90: Lamguindaz v. the United Kingdom
no. 19844/92: Leuffen v. Germany
no. 18824/91: Lockwood v. the United Kingdom
no. 18395/91: Lupker and Others v. the Netherlands
no. 19924/92: M. v. AUSTRIA
no. 17392/90: M. v. DENMARK
no. 14483/88: M. v. NORWAY
no. 15346/89: M. v. the Netherlands
no. 18594/91: M. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19153/91: M. v. the United Kingdom
no. 18542/91: M. v. the United Kingdom
no. 18787/91: M. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19000/91: M. v. the United Kingdom
no. 16712/90: M., E. and B. v. Switzerland
no. 19527/92: M.C. v. the United Kingdom
no. 17112/90: M.S. v. the Netherlands
no. 20991/92: M.S. v. the United Kingdom
no. 21026/92: Macosko v. Czechoslovakia
no. 21029/92: Matter v. Czechoslovakia
no. 18949/91: Maxwell v. the United Kingdom
no. 18949/91: Maxwell v. the United Kingdom
no. 17878/91: Mbunzu v. the Netherlands
no. 18943/91: Mcallister v. the United Kingdom
no. 18632/91: Mccotter v. the United Kingdom
no. 20433/92: Mccourt v. the United Kingdom
no. 15967/90: McLOUGHLIN v. IRELAND
no. 16424/90: Mcmichael v. the United Kingdom
no. 19006/91: Meldrum v. the Netherlands
no. 19513/92: Mlynek v. Austria
no. 17852/91: Murphy v. the United Kingdom
no. 17389/90: Myrdal v. Norway
no. 15252/89: N. v. Switzerland
no. 19184/91: N. v. Switzerland
no. 17229/90: N.A. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19028/91: Nielsen v. Denmark
no. 15497/89: Nijs, Jansen and the Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij Algemeen Ziekenfonds Delft-Schiedam-Westland U.A. v. the Netherlands
no. 14369/88: Noviflora Sweden Aktiebolag v. Sweden
no. 17441/90: O'Neill v. the United Kingdom
no. 17631/91: O. and T. v. the Netherlands
no. 12884/87: O. v. AUSTRIA
no. 14562/89: O. v. AUSTRIA
no. 16534/90: O. v. ICELAND
no. 17143/90: Oldham v. the United Kingdom
no. 18969/91: Ollila v. Finland
no. 17072/90: P. v. AUSTRIA
no. 16796/90: P. v. AUSTRIA
no. 19027/91: P. v. SWEDEN
no. 17132/90: P. v. the Netherlands
no. 15397/89: P. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19085/91: P.K., M.K. and B.K. v. the United Kingdom
no. 17733/91: Papadopoulos v. Greece
no. 18768/91: Peprah-Baawuah v. the United Kingdom
no. 15264/89: Philis v. Greece
no. 16598/90: Philis v. Greece
no. 18828/91: Porter-Harris v. the United Kingdom
no. 18337/91: Preissler v. Germany
no. 15155/89: R. v. AUSTRIA
no. 17595/90: R. v. AUSTRIA
no. 17750/91: R. v. GERMANY
no. 15942/90: R. v. the Netherlands
no. 16679/90: R.C. v. the Netherlands
no. 15433/89: Raghip v. the United Kingdom
no. 14220/88: Ravnsborg v. Sweden
no. 21027/92: Richter v. Czechoslovakia
no. 19435/92: Roelofs v. the Netherlands
no. 15595/89: Rozendale v. the Netherlands
no. 17227/90: Röda Korsets Ungdomsförbund, Gnesta and Moderata Samlingspartiet, Trosa-Vagnhärad v. Sweden
no. 19783/92: S. v. AUSTRIA
no. 15222/89: S. v. AUSTRIA
no. 18131/91: S. v. FINLAND
no. 17116/90: S. v. Switzerland
no. 15185/89: S. v. the Netherlands
no. 16757/90: S. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19788/92: S. v. the United Kingdom
no. 16244/90: S.W. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19899/92: Saenz Vanegas v. Cyprus
no. 16958/90: Sahinler v. Germany
no. 15062/89: Schiansky v. Austria
no. 17713/91: Schindewolf v. Germany
no. 19005/91: Schouten v. the Netherlands
no. 16039/90: Solymossy v. Sweden
no. 17259/90: T. v. the United Kingdom
no. 15513/89: T.A. v. SWEDEN
no. 18600/91: T.D., D.E. and M.F. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19804/92: T.G.H. v. the United Kingdom
no. 19905/92: T.Y. v. SWEDEN
no. 17865/91: Taskinen v. Finland
no. 18897/91: Times Newspapers Ltd and Andrew Neil v. the United Kingdom
no. 16269/90: Tollefsen v. Norway
no. 18139/91: Tolstoy Miloslavski v. the United Kingdom
no. 16697/90: U.P. v. Switzerland
no. 17712/91: Ullah v. the United Kingdom
no. 18607/91: V. v. FINLAND
no. 18280/91: V. v. MALTA
no. 15057/89: V. v. the Netherlands
no. 17107/90: V. v. the Netherlands
no. 17581/90: Vaes v. the Netherlands
no. 16034/90: Van De Hurk v. the Netherlands
no. 13628/88: Van De Vin ; and Others v. the Netherlands
no. 15596/89: Van Der Sloot ; and Others v. the Netherlands
no. 13535/88: Van Dungen v. the Netherlands
001-1187: Van Zomeren v. the Netherlands
no. 12596/86: Van Zomeren v. the Netherlands
no. 15153/89: Vereinigung Demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Gubi v. Austria
no. 17851/91: Vogt v. Germany
no. 16038/90: W. v. AUSTRIA
no. 19488/92: W. v. AUSTRIA
no. 19520/92: W. v. AUSTRIA
no. 15247/89: W. v. AUSTRIA
no. 14422/88: W. v. the Netherlands
no. 18091/91: W. v. the Netherlands
no. 15509/89: W.G. v. Austria
no. 20308/92: W.M. v. Germany
no. 18123/91: W.W. v. the United Kingdom
no. 16056/90: Wahlberg, Engman and Engdahl v. Sweden
no. 18456/91: Werbickas v. the United Kingdom
no. 19404/92: Williams v. the United Kingdom
no. 15484/89: Wynne v. the United Kingdom
no. 19046/91: Y.E. v. the Netherlands
no. 19429/92: Z. v. IRELAND
no. 16461/90: Z. v. Switzerland
no. 15379/89: Z. v. the Netherlands
no. 15723/89: Zariouhi and Others v. the Netherlands
no. 17279/90: Zukrigl v. Austria