Opinion of Advocate General Darmon delivered on 12 July 1994

1 Original language: French.

2 Case C-192/89 Sevince v Staatssecretaris van Justitie [1990] ECR I-3461.

3 Case C-237/91 Kus v Landeshaupstadt Wiesbaden [1992] ECR I-6781.

4 An agreement concluded in the name of the Community by Council Decision 64/732/EEC of 23 December 1963 (published in English in OJ 1973 C 113, p. 2) and supplemented by an additional protocol of 23 November 1970, which entered into force on 1 January 1973 (OJ 1972 L 293, p. 1).

5 With regard to that agreement, see my Opinion in Km, paragraphs 2 to 5.

6 Article 12.

7 See Service, cited above, paragraphs 7 to 12, and Kus, cited above, paragraph 9.

8 Kus, paragraph 9.

9 Paragraphs 4 to 8.

10 Paragraphs 10 to 21.

11 See my Opinion in Kus, paragraph 49.

12 Paragraph 26 of the grounds, paragraph 2 of the operative part and points 9 to 50 of my Opinion in the case.

13 Points 64 and 65.

14 Case C-18/90 Onem v Kziber [1991] ECR I-199. paragraph 27.

15 Case C-58/93 Yousfi v Belgan State [1994] ECR I-1353. paragraphs 21 to 23.

16 The decision of 20 December 1976 concerns lhe implementation of Article 12 of the Agreement.

17 Third recital in the preamble to Decision I/S0. emphasis added.

18 Case C-27/91 Le Manoir [1991] ECR I-5531.

19 Paragraph 7.

20 Paragraph 8.

21 Paragraph 3 of the operative part.

22 Paragraph 1 of the operative part.

23 Kus, paragraph 16.

24 Paragraph 19 of the observations of the German Government.

25 Second indent of Article 6(1).

26 Order for reference

27 Case 12/86 Demirel v Stadt Schwabisch Gmund [1987] ECR 3719.

28 Paragraph 14. For an instance of a provision in the EEC-Morocco Cooperation Agreement being recognized as having direct effect, see Yoush, cited in footnote 14, paragraphs 16, 17 and 19.

29 Paragraph 15.

30 Point 31.

31 Paragraph 21.

32 Finding of the Court in Demirel, paragraph 23.

33 Paragraph 21.

34 Paragraph 22.

35 Paragraph 24.

36 Paragraph 17.

37 See, to that effect, paragraph 24 of the Commission's observations.

38 See paragraph 32 of the German Government's observations.

39 Kus, cited above, at paragraph 21, emphasis added.

40 Paragraph 3 of the operative part.

41 Paragraph 29.

42 Paragraph 33.

43 See, to this effect, B. Huber: Das Sevince-Urteil des EuGH: Ein neues EG-Aufenthaltsrecht für türkische Arbeitnehmer, NVwZ, 1991, p. 242-243.