Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 10 December 1986

1 Translated from the French.

2 See in particular the judgment of 29 January 1985 in Case 147/83 Münchener Import-Weinkellerei Herold Bindern GmbH v Commutimi [1985] ECR 257 and the judgment of 6 October 1982 in Case 307/81 Alusuisse Italia SpA v Council and Commission [1982] ECR 3463

3 Official Journal 1985, L 320, p. 9.

4 See the judgment in Alusuisse v Council and Commission, cited above, at paragraph 11 of the decision.

5 Judgment of 18 November 1975 in Case 100/74 Société C. A. M. SA v Commission [1975] ECR 1393, paragraph 19 at p. 1403.

6 Judgment of 14 July 1983 in Case 231/82 Spijker Kwasten BV v Commission [1983] ECR 2559, paragraphs 8 to 10 at p. 2566.

7 Judgment of 13 May 1971 in Joined Cases 41 to 44/70 International Fruit Company NV and Others v Commission [1971] ECR 411, paragraphs 16 to 21; judgment in Société C A. M. SA v Commission cited above, paragraphs 14 to 19; judgment of 31 March 1977 in Case 88/76 Société pour l'exportation des sucres v Commission [1977] ECR 709, paragraphs 9 to 11; judgment of 3 May 1978 in Case 112/77 August Topfer & Co. GmbH v Commission [1978] ECR 1019, paragraph 9; judgments of 27 November 1984 in Case 232/81 Agricola Commerciale Olio Srl and Others v Commission [1984] ECR 3881, and Case 264/81 SpA Savma v Commission [1984] ECR 3915, paragraph 11.

8 Judgments of 29 March 1979 in Case 113/77 NTN Toyo Bearing Company Ltd and Others v Council [1979] ECR 1185, paragraph 11; Case 119/77, Nippon Seiko KK and Others v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 1303, paragraph 14; Case 120/77, Koyo Seiko Co. Ltd and Others v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 1337, paragraph 23; Case 121/77 Nachi Fujitoshi Corporation and Others v Council [1979] ECR 1363, paragraph 11; judgments of 29 October 1980 in Case 138/79 Roquette frères SA v Council [1980] ECR 3333 and Case 139/79 Maizena GmbH v Council [1980] ECR 3393, paragraphs 14 to 16.

9 That may be the case in particular with regulations imposing ami-dumping duties: see the judgment of 29 March 1979 in Case 118/77 Import Standard Office (ISO) v Council [1979] ECR 1277, paragraphs 19 to 22; the judgment in Nippon Seiko, cited above, paragraph 13, in Koyo Seiko, cited above, paragraphs 18 to 21 and in Nachi Fujikosbi, cited above, paragraphs 8 and 9; the judgment of 21 February 1984 in Joined Cases 239 and 275/82 Allied Corporation v Commission [1984] ECR 1005, paragraphs 10 to 12; the judgment of 20 March 1985 in Case 264/82 Timex Corporation v Council and Commission [1985] ECR 849, paragraphs 11 to 15; and the judgment of 23 May 1985 in Case 53/83 Allied Corporation v Council [1985] ECR 1621, paragraph 4.