Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 18 November 1988

1 Original language: French.

2 OJ L 302, 15.11.1985.

3 Case 75/63 Hoekitra (nee Unger) v Bejtuur der Bedrijfivereniging voor Detailhandel en Ambachten [1964] ECR 177.

4 See in this regard the judgments of 23 March 1982 in Case 53/81 Levin v Staatssecretaris van Justitie [1982] ECR 1035 and of 3 June 1986 in Case 139/85 Kempfv Staatssecretaris van /listitte [1986] ECR 1741.

5 Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement of workers within the Community (OJ, English Specia! Edition 1968 (II), p 475)

6 Judgment of 23 March 1983 in Case 77/82 Peskeloglou v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit [1983] ECR 1085.

7 OJ L 291, 19.11.1979.

8 OJ L 302, 15.11.1985, p. 480.

9 In the case of Portugal, it is Article 220.

10 OJ L 20, 28. 1.1976, p 19

11 Judgment of 16 June 1187 in Case 46/86 Albert Romka and Officier van Justitie for the District of Zwolle [1987] ECR 2671

12 Joined Cases 80 and 81 /77 Société les Commissionnaires rèumi and les fils de Henn Ramel v Receveur des douanes [1978] ECR 927.

13 See, besides lhe judgment in Commissionnaires réunis, cited above, the judgments of 7 October 1985 in Case 199/84 Procuratore detta Republica v Migliorini and Fischi [1985] ECR 3317 and of 2 February 1988 in Case 61/86 United Kingdom* Commission [1988] ECR 431.

14 Judgment of 14 July 1976 in Joined Cases 3, 4 and 6/76 Cornells Kramer and Others [1976] ECR 1279.

15 See in particular the judgment of 10 July 1986 in Case 60/85 M. E. S. van Vermoolen, née Luitjen and Raad van Arbeid, Breda [1986] ECR 2365, at pp. 2372 and 2373, paragraph 14.

16 For a codified version, see Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, OJ L 230, 22.8.1983, p. 6.

17 In this regard, see in particular the judgment of 4 April 1974 in Case 167/73 Commission v France [1974] ECR 359, paragraph 35.