Opinion of Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered on 16 February 1989
1 Original language: French.
2 Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3453/81 of 2 December 1981 imposing a provisional antidumping duty on imports of certain cotton yams originating in Turkey (OT L 347, 3.12.1981, p. 19).
3 Council Regulation (EEC) No 789/82 of 2 April 1982 imposing a definitive antidumping duty on imports of certain cotton yarns originating in Turkey (OJ L 90, 3.4.1982, p. 1).
4 Opinion in Case 312/84 [1987] ECR 841, at p. 858.
5 Judgment of 24 February 1987 in Case 312/84 Continentale Produkten-Gesellschafi v Commission [1987] ECR 841, paragraph 12.
6 Judgment of 21 February 1984 in Joined Cases 239 and 275/82 Allied Corporation and Others v Commission [1984] ECR 1005, paragraph 15.
7 The regulation entered into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities, that is, on 3 April 1982.
8 See Article 2 of Regulation No 3453/81.
9 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3017/79 of 20 December 1979 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Economic Community (OJ L 339, 31.12.1979, p. 1).
10 Judgment of 5 October 1988 in Joined Cases 277 and 300/85 Canon Inc. v Conncil [1988] ECR 5731.
11 See the observations of the Commission, paragraph 1.3.
12 In this connection, see the judgments of 9 July 1969 in Case 10/69 Ponelange v Smith Corona Marchant International [1969] ECR 309, paragraph 6, of 15 December 1976 in Case 35/76 Simmenthat v Italian Minister for Finance [1976] ECR 1871, paragraph 7, of 5 October 1977 in Case 5/77 Tedeschi v Denkavit [1977] ECR 1555, paragraph 17, of 30 November 1977 in Case 52/77 Cayrol v Rivoira [1977] ECR 2261, paragraph 32, of 22 March 1977 in Case /8/76 Steinike ana Weinlig v Federal Republic of Germany [1977] ECR 595, paragraph 14, and of 30 April 1974 in Case 155/73 Sacchi v Italian Republic [1974] ECR 409, paragraph 3.
13 P. 6 of the French translation.
14 Case 264/82 [1985] ECR 849.
15 Sec the annex to the Council's observations, paragraphs 2, 10 and 11.
16 See the annex to the Council's observations, paragraphs 5, 6, 8 and 9.
17 Judgments of 7 May 1987 in Case 258/84 Nippon Seiko KKv Council [1987] ECR 1923, paragraph 28, and of 26 June 1986 in Case 203/85 Niœlet Instrument GmbH v Hauptzollamt am Main-Flugbafin [1986] ECR 2049, paragraph 10.
18 Judgment of 22 March 1979 in Case 134/78 Danhuber v Bundesanstalt Jur landwirtschaftliche Marktordnung [19791 ECR 1007, paragraph 6.
19 Judgment of 11 February 1971 in Case 37/70 Rewe-Zentrale des Lebensmittel-Großhandels GmbH v Hauptzollamt Emmerich [1971] ECR 23, paragraph 8.
20 Case 258/84, quoted above, paragraph 21; judgment of 11 July 1985 in Case 42/84 Remia v Commission [1985] ECR 2545, paragraph 34; Opinion of Mr Advocate General Warner in Case 113/77 NTN Toyo Bearing Company v Council [1979] ECR 1212, at p. 1259; sec also the Opinion of Mrs Advocate General Rozès in Case 191/82 Fediol v Commission [1983] ECR 2937, at p. 2947.
21 Joined Cases 277 and 300/85, quoted above, paragraph 11.
22 Ibidem, paragraph 17.
23 Judgments of 4 July 1973 in Case 1/73 Westzucker GmbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratstelle für Zucker [1973) ECR 723, paragraph 5, of 5 December 1973 in Case 143/73 Société des produits alimentaires el diététiques v Fonds d'orientation et Je regularisation des marchés and Fonds d'intervention et de régularisation du marché du sucre [1973] ECR 1433, paragraph 8, and of 15 February 1978 in Case 96/77 SA Ancienne Maison Marcel Bauche and SARL François Delquignies v Administration française des douanes [1978] ECR 383, paragraph 48.
24 Case 68/77 IFG v Commission [1978] ECR 353.
25 Case 1/73, quoted above, paragraph 6.
26 Judgments of 27 April 1978 in Case 90/77 Hellmut Stimming KG v Commission [1978] ECR 995, and of 1 February 1978 in Case 78/77 Johann Lührs v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [1978] ECR 169.
27 OJ C 196, 3.8.1979.
28 Twenty-fifth recital in the preamble to Regulation No 789/82.
29 Judgment of 14 February 1978 in Case 68/77, quoted above, [1978] ECR 353, paragraph 11.