Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 4 October 1989

1 Original language. French

2 [1988] ECR 3877 and 3897.

3 [1988] ECR 4635

4 [1988] ECR 2805.

5 Sec also the judgment of 15 January 1986 in Case 41/84 Pinna v Celine d'alloeations familiales de la Savoie [1986] ECR 1, paragraphs 23 and 24.

6 See, in particular, the judgment of 14 January 1988 in Case 63/86 Conmistión v Italy, cited above, paragraph 14, and the judgment of 10 July 1986 in Case 79/85 Segers v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor Bank- en Verzekeringswezen, Groothandel en Vrije Beroepen [1986] ECR 2375, paragraph 15

7 [1988] ECR 1637

8 For a definition of employment in the public service, sec in particular the judgment of 3 July 1986 in Case 66/85 Lawne-Blmnv Land Badai- Württemberg [1986] ECR 2121, paragraph 27.

9 In that context, see the Court's Įudgment of 7 May 1986 in Case 131/85 Gill v Regicrtmgipmndent Dimddorf [1986] ECR 1573, paragraph 17:The right to restrict freedom of movement on grounds of public health is intended not to exclude the public health sector, as a sector of economic activity and from the point of view of access to employment, from the application of the principles of freedom of movement but to permit Member States to refuse access to (heir territory or residence there to persons whose access or residence would in itself constitute a danger for public health

10 Council Directive 88/295/EEC of 22 March 1988 amending Directive 77/62/EEC relating to the coordination of procedures on the award of public supply contracts and repealing certain provisions of Directive 80/767/EEC (OJ L 127, 20.5.1988, p. 1).